Wednesday, January 31

And We Are Supposed to TRUST Them?

The woman was in Tampa on Saturday for Gasparilla, an annual pirate-theme parade that draws thousands of people. She said she was walking alone to her car when a man pulled her behind a building and raped her, McElroy said.

She reported the rape Saturday afternoon, and officers took her to a rape crisis center where she was given the first of two doses of the morning-after pill, McElroy said. The second dose is supposed to be taken within 24 hours.

Later, as she was riding in a patrol car trying to locate the crime scene in the dark, police found the warrant stemming from a 2003 juvenile arrest for grand theft and burglary. It said she owed $4,585.
"They stopped the investigation right there" and put her in handcuffs, Moore said.


Yep, you read it right. A college woman was raped, reported it to police, and during the investigation they found an outstanding warrant for a JUVENILE offense and put her in jail for two days.... and then the medical tech INSIDE the prison refused to give her the second part of the 'morning after' contraception pill.

Her lawyer only got her out by going public and straight to the media. So the rapist is running around free and the victim is put in jail. (Talk about shades of the Handmaid's Tale) And even worse they did this during the middle of the investigation.

What do I take away from this? A woman is worth shit and any excuse to let someone (anyone) get away with beating, raping or killing them is just dandy.

Oh, and that warrant? The rape victim states she has proof that it was, in fact, paid in full in 2004.

More disinformation from the protest

click on images below for larger version.












We just happened to be standing there when the supposed "rush on the Capital" happened on January 27th. You can see in the first picture a bunch of young people moving towards the steps. Many had bandanas over their faces. After a while police came in on motorcycles and stood on the steps of the capital while the young people chanted. There was no violence. I stuck around and took some pictures. Later, as we walked down the path away from the Capital, a few more kids wearing bandanas were walking up towards it. Despite what news accounts might have said especially this one which got the ball rolling, there was no painted graffiti on the capital. The story was bogus and cops were not ordered to stand down while kids defaced the capital. The right wing blogs, especially the stupid ass freepers, have run with this disinformation for days now. Check out all the bogus stories listed on google. Amazing. Not only that, the numbers of the protesters attending the whole shebang has been greatly misreported. The television news has done a great job in playing down the protest and minimizing the amount of those in attendence.

I found this blog with a picture of something written in charcoal on the ground about 30 ft from the capital. That was the extent of any graffiti and seemed to be the act of a lone charcoal-er.

And here's a video on YouTube from the other side of the steps from where DBK (who has pics too) and I were. Do the police officers look upset?

Labels: , ,

From The "You Just Can't Make This Shit Up" Department

On Friday, a major UN report on "global climate change" (I love the euphemism for "we have fucked the planet up royally") will be released. Ever the trend setters, the US government will suggest new and, ahem, unique ways to combat global warming.

Not for the US such prosaic solutions as reducing greeenhouse gasses or energy conservation. Nope, what we really, really need are gigantic mirrors in space to reflect the sun's rays. Or maybe a bunch of mylar ballons.

If so-called scientists got paid to come up with those ideas, I want their job.

Evangelical Studs

I watched the HBO documentary by Alexandra Pelosi, "Friends of God" yesterday. It was revealed by disgraced pastor Ted Haggard and others that evangelicals have the best sex lives and not only that, their women climax every time. Watch

You also get to see the story about the young woman who was in college studying law but found the lord and now has 10 beautiful kids whom she home schools. Aside from all the typical secular, liberal, northerner bashing, the program was pretty interesting. You can't really fault oppressed people for jumping on the "Jesus will save you" bandwagon. People need something to live for and something to make them happy. They seemed like nice enough people but perhaps a bit too gullible when it comes to anti-evolution and their questionable family values. Well ok, a lot too gullible. This country is supposedly big enough to grant freedom to believers of all sorts. I knew about these "holiest of holy" people, but since they didn't live around here, I didn't pay them much mind. However it bothered me that the ACLU and the rabid atheists made too much of a big deal about certain things and I feared that it would all come back and bite them in the rear while dragging the rest of us "live and let live" people into a theocracy.

You can however fault their leaders for making this movement a political issue and that is what you will see in the documentary, especially Jerry Falwell bragging about it: "Evangelicals are the largest minority block in this country. It's not a majority, but I don't think you can win without them. John Kerry learned that. Al Gore learned that. And Hillary will learn that in 2008." Hopefully not. But that is where their 'beliefs' become a threat to a free society. By coercing their believers to continually vote against their interests and with more and more people being forced into the fringes of society, their numbers will grow- their movement will grow. They are very organized and Falwell also bragged at how fast he can get them to literally shut down the Capital switchboard. Keep your eyes opened.

------
Something I noticed in the documentary that I really hadn't understood before: The evangelicals are so hell bent against Hollywood morality and homosexuality because they truly believe that god is going to punish the whole country for their acts. To me and you, it seems ridiculous, but this is what we're up against and it should be taken seriously.

Labels: ,

Oh those bad bad peaceniks

Nevermind that it was a peace march, and that the marchers supported the troops so much so that they wanted them to come home safely and soon, the MSM decided to focus on an alleged incident where a veteran, who interestingly keeps coming up as the perennial victim was either spit upon or was spit near by an alleged protester. If it happened, it was an unfortunate incident and it was also not in keeping with the message of the march overall. The NY Times got the nonsense spewing in the news and most likely it was wishful thinking on the part of the reporters who were looking for something bad to happen. So far, no one has actually been able to identify the alleged spitter, even as far as gender. Media Matters reports on the NY Times article and asks some pertinent questions: Did anyone see the incident? Did the soldier actually spit back? What did the protester look like? Do the police have a record of this?

Media Matters reported yesterday with more questions for the NY Times, especially since Josh Sparling, the wounded Iraq veteran, appeared on most of the Fox programs to tell his side of the story with no substantiation. Sparling told Fox and Friends that there people with bats who wanted to hurt him and that protesters were cursing him out, flipping him the finger and spitting but remarked that there were a couple of non-violent peace protesters who passed by him though.

A DU'er who was present at the march posted a letter he wrote to the NY Times writer who wrote the original story:
Interestingly, while I was marching along the north side of the capitol, I was approached by a young woman who claimed to be a reporter for the NY Times working with you on the story. She interviewed my friend David Quinly and he was quoted in your story.

Then she turned to me and told me she had seen a protester spit on a soldier and asked for my comment. I told her I didn't believe that, and she repeated that she had seen this happen. I told her the peace movement is more supportive of the troops than anyone who supports this war, because we want our troops to come home, while those who support the war are advocating sending them into harm's way. So I really could not believe that anyone who opposed the war had spit on a soldier. My comments were not included in your story.

I was upset when I read your story the next day to see this was an "alleged" incident and the protester had supposedly spit on the ground in front of the soldier (which is quite different from spitting ON this soldier). In other words, what was related in your story was not at all what that reporter had told me. So she either lied to me or your story is false.

When I got back home, I did a little research that apparently you did not do and found out some interesting things about this soldier who claims he was spit on. He also claims to have received a death threat in the mail while he was in Walter Reed Hospital and he claims he was mistreated in an airport when he returned from Iraq.

He has been celebrated on Michelle Malkin's website and was a guest on Sean Hannity's show.

Now I am just a teacher and not a reporter but I hope you are wondering what I am wondering - what are the odds that a soldier who received a death threat also happened to get spit on at that march?? Adding in the fact that your assistant who interviewed me either lied to me or misrepresented the facts in your story, I now do not believe that this spitting incident happened at all.

Ian, the NY Times needs to print a retraction. I will wait for a reply from you and if I don't hear back I will contact your editor. The blogs are already on this story and it doesn't look like it will go away without a retraction in your paper.
Now go and read Digby's post, They Tried to Kill Me
It's unfucking believable.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, January 30

Activism: Legislation to Help Breast Cancer Patients

Can you imagine your or your loved one having breast cancer surgery and then being sent right home? If you have one of those typical crappy health insurance plans, this may be something that you or a loved one will have to face. My mom (who actually had good insurance coverage plus Medicare) was sent home from the hospital with a big old disgusting drain attached to what was left of her right breast. It was a travesty. She came out of the surgery just fine but almost died from an infection afterwards.

DBK alerts us to some potentially good news and you need to act:
Representative Jo Ann Davis (R-VA-1) is the sponsor of H.R. 119, the Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act. The legislation requires "that health plans provide coverage for a minimum hospital stay for mastectomies, lumpectomies, and lymph node dissection for the treatment of breast cancer and coverage for secondary consultations." The minimum stay period is 48 hours.
You can't even count on health insurers to do the right thing anymore. A measly 48 hours isn't too much to ask for if one needs it.
Sign the petition at lifetimetv.com or write to your congress critters.

The Liberal Media Strikes Hillary Again

... and ignores McCain's flip flops. The media didn't even bother to notice that McCain fell asleep while Bush was speaking. In a fair media, they'd take pot shots at his nap.

We can't rely on the media to expose GOP candidates for president in 2008 for who they are, but we can sure rely on the media, and even my local news station, to ask you to speculate on who Hillary was referring to in Iowa:
A man in the crowd asked Clinton what she had in her background that would make her a good commander-in-chief, given that the world has "evil" leaders and a lot of them "happen to be men."

Clinton rephrased the question for the audience because most did not hear what the man said.

"The question really is," she said, "we face a lot of dangers in the world, and in the gentleman's words, we face a lot of 'evil men.'

"People like Osama bin Laden comes to mind."

She paused.

"And what in my background equips me to deal" --Clinton waited a beat and got a gleam in her eyes -- "with evil and bad men?"
OMG. Stop the presses. This is important earth shattering news that must be disseminated even though no one knows for sure what she was thinking and most likely they guessed wrong. She must have been talking about her husband, right? Well that's what the media wants you to think when everyone knows that she was most likely referring to John Gibson at Fox News, the idiot who makes up news when there is nothing juicy enough for him to report for real. Or how about Bush, Cheney, Rupert Murdoch, Karl Rove, Lush Bimbo, Everyone on Fox News, the GOP, et al. Duh. How about she was thinking of all the bad men who are reporting this nonsense and pissing me off? Or the bastard who asked the loaded question?

It's a smear, I tell you, to suggest that she was thinking of her husband. It was projection to the nth degree, for if she believed that her husband was indeed evil and bad in the real senses of the words, then she would be an absolute fool to stay with Bill. They want you to think she is a fool or power hungry or both. She may understand men more than anyone thinks. That scares them too.

The media wants you also to believe that she is weak or that she must be a lesbian. Maybe that is what GOP wives who stay with their cheating husbands are. But maybe she isn't weak for staying with him- maybe she's strong and she values their companionship more than their sex life. Maybe she does stay with him for his political connections, but I doubt it. Who knows? Who cares? The GOPer's, probably due to experience, believe that a real woman would dump her cheating man and take him for all he's got. Hillary's got her own. She doesn't need to take Bill's.

I suggest that it takes one to know one and every item that the GOP media uses to smear Hillary is something that they despise in themselves and something that they have done or would have done and even more so. Big babies. But enough on the Hillary smear campaign. I propose that we concentrate on the reality of the McCain campaign.

I demand to know what the hell that growth is on the left side of John McCain's face. It's getting bigger and bigger. What is it? Is it contagious? Has he had sex with an African ape? Is it a growth that may make his head explode while he is standing at a podium somewhere thinking up a new twist to appeal to his current audience? Will the explosion be so gross that it will make me barf? Is this the new Pinocchio syndrome?

You can bet your sweet bippy that if a Democratic candidate had a suspicious growth on his or her face, Dr Sanjay Gupta would be all over it with bigger than life diagrams and breaking news specials featuring "experts" from around the world: "Alien V: Is a Democratic presidential candidate is spawning an alien, lizard-like, communist creature in his very jaw that is set to take over the world? You be the judge."

Back to the real world and what this post was supposed to be about in the first place until I went off on one of my usual tangents: Welcome to "The Real McCain." Your source for all things McCain. Watch the video. Do you wanna see a flip-flopper? Get your talking points here.

Labels: , ,

Senator Wayne Allard (R-CO): Evil Slime Person of the Day

Senator Wayne Allard (R-CO) proposed a bill to eliminate Federal Minimum wage altogether and revert to the lowest possible wage that a state mandated. If you live in Kansas, that means you can be paid, $2.65/hour. Allard insists that you can indeed support a family on $2.65/hr. I'd like to see him put his money where his mouth is.
-------------------------

Which Senators voted to kill the federal minimum wage? Bob Geiger Reports:
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lott (R-MS)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Sununu (R-NH)
Thomas (R-WY)

For the record, those running for reelection in 2008 are Alexander, Bennett, Chambliss, Cochran, Cornyn, Craig, Enzi, Graham, Hagel, Inhofe, McConnell and Sununu.

If any of these are your Senators, please write to your local papers and of course, the Senators.

Labels:

Tony Snowjob on Saturdays DC March

Q [Helen Thomas] What did the President think of the march on Washington?

MR. SNOW: I don't think he really thought a lot about it. It's nice to see Jane Fonda in front of the camera again. There are a number of people who were here making statements, and that's perfectly appropriate. This is a vigorous democracy.

Q [Helen Thomas] You said something earlier this morning, though. Would you like to repeat that?

MR. SNOW: It's simply that there were predictions of a larger audience than showed up for the protest.

Q [Helen Thomas] And you really counted heads?

MR. SNOW: No. Did you? Did you see 100,000?

Q [Helen Thomas] Don't you think we had a good turnout?

MR. SNOW: Honestly, I didn't go there, Helen, so I'm not going to characterize.

Q [Helen Thomas] How do you make a statement like that?

MR. SNOW: Well, because it's pretty clear from the press accounts that nobody attached six figures to the number who appeared.


Mr Snow is wrong on all accounts. Shame shame shame

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 29

Oh What a Tangled Web We Weave

It's quite juicy. When will Cheney be charged with treason and sent before the firing squad?

At the Libby trial, Ex-Cheney aide and spokeswoman Cathie Martin revealed the details of the Plame Leak. FYI: Cathie Martin was hired by Mary Matalin. She is married to Kevin Martin, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. How convenient.
Ex-Cheney Aide Details Media Tactics
"...by July 6, 2003, Wilson wrote his own account in the Times and appeared on "Meet the Press" on NBC.

After that much exposure, Cheney, Libby and Martin spent the next week trying get out word that Cheney did not know Wilson, did not ask for the mission to Niger, never got Wilson's report and only learned about the trip from news stories in 2003.

Cheney personally dictated these points to Martin. She e-mailed them to the White House press secretary for relay to reporters.
[...]

...she had to call National Security Council and CIA press officers to learn which reporters were still working on stories. Once Martin got names, Cheney ordered his right-hand man, Libby, rather than lowly press officers, to call _ a signal of the topic's importance.

Top levels of the Bush administration decided that CIA Director George Tenet would issue a statement taking the blame for allowing Bush to mention the Niger story. Cheney and Libby worried Tenet would not go far enough to distance the vice president from the affair. Libby asked Martin to map a media strategy in case Tenet fell short.
Dana Milbank in WaPo reports more on Martin's testimony. Turns out that Cheney's office believes they can control the news with Tim Russert on Meet the Press. The strategy to alter the truth by Martin was shown at the trial directly from her notes for all the world to see:
Option 1: "MTP-VP," she wrote, then listed the pros and cons of a vice presidential appearance on the Sunday show. Under "pro," she wrote: "control message."

"I suggested we put the vice president on 'Meet the Press,' which was a tactic we often used," Martin testified. "It's our best format."
And it gets more juicy:
She walked the jurors through how the White House coddles friendly writers and freezes out others. To deal with the Wilson controversy, she hastily arranged a Cheney lunch with conservative commentators.
and this...
She put "Meet the Press" at the top of her list of "Options" but noted that it might appear "too defensive." Next, she proposed "leak to Sanger-Pincus-newsmags. Sit down and give to him." This meant that the "no-leak" White House would give the story to the New York Times' David Sanger, The Washington Post's Walter Pincus, or Time or Newsweek. Option 3: "Press conference -- Condi/Rumsfeld." Option 4: "Op-ed."

Martin was embarrassed about the "leak" option; the case, after all, is about a leak. "It's a term of art," she said. "If you give it to one reporter, they're likelier to write the story."

For all the elaborate press management, things didn't always go according to plan. Martin described how Time wound up with an exclusive one weekend because she didn't have a phone number for anybody at Newsweek.
When further questioned, she replied:
"Few of us in the White House had had hands-on experience with any crisis like this."
TPM comments further at how Darth Cheney's office refuses to reveal who works there and how many staffers he has. From American Prospect:
His press people seem shocked that a reporter would even ask for an interview with the staff. The blanket answer is no -- nobody is available. Amazingly, the vice president’s office flatly refuses to even disclose who works there, or what their titles are. “We just don’t give out that kind of information,” says Jennifer Mayfield, another of Cheney’s “angels.” She won’t say who is on staff, or what they do? No, she insists. “It’s just not something we talk about.”
UPDATE: Hannah informed us in the comments that TPM Muckracker has the staff list from Darth's office. You can get your copy here. Thanks Hannah

Sunday, January 28

Anti-war protest review

The anti-War on Iraq protest yesterday didn't get enough publicity in the lead up as I think it should have. Some big old lefty bloggers didn't say much about it, but when you're sponsored by the "man," I guess you have to keep a low profile on patriotic matters. The wingers, naturally, had a field day criticizing it because of the hollywood types who attended. Big deal. Try to find a peace-nik who gives a hoot about what movie stars have to say. They were there to garner some publicity for the event, no doubt. Even bad publicity is better than no publicity.

For a January 27th, there was a darn good turnout. It's not easy to get out of your comfort zone and go to DC when it's 19º outside with the windchill at -8º. The god's must have blessed the gathering because it was downright balmy at 52º during the march. No one knows how many people were there, but there was a flood of people for miles and it warmed the cockles of my heart to see so many people who oppose our troops being used to further the corporate agenda and the deaths of so many people who should be alive today. Surely there were 10's of thousands and maybe even 100 thousand. Each person counted for maybe another thousand or even 10,000.

A bunch of kids were reported to have "stormed the Capital." DBK, Mimus Pauly, Jersey Cynic, Red State Blues and I were standing right there at the steps of the Capital admiring its architecture when the kids ran up the path towards the steps. When I find my card reader, I'll upload the pictures I took when it happened. It wasn't a big hoopla really. The police didn't look too disturbed as they lined up under the steps. They weren't wearing riot gear and the kids were just chanting and exercising their free speech as far as I could see.

I understand that there were counter-protestors there, but we missed them unfortunately. There were approximately 40 of them- a few more than at the last protest. I think the pro-war types were afraid of being approached by military recruiters. But where else could you find new recruits during an unpopular war but at a counter protest?

Read below about the march on the Pentagon coming up in March.

Labels:

Quote of the Day:

The psychic depths are nature, and nature is creative life. Whatever values in the visible world are destroyed by modern relativism, the psyche will produce their equivalents. -- C.G.Jung, Modern Man in Search Of a Soul

Save The Date

On March 17, 2007, there will be a march on the Pentagon, again to demand US troop withdrawal from Iraq. Be there or be square.

Talking with Blonde Liz, Jersey, DBK and Mimus Pauly yesterday, we were wondering why the organizers chose March 17th, which is, after all, Saint Paddy's Day, when usually all we have on our minds are various licentious pursuits: drinking, drinking, potentially sex, and drinking. However, a short google expedition revealed the reasons this particular date was chosen.

March 17, 2007 is not only the fourth anniversary of the start of the Iraq war; it is also the 40th anniversary of the historic march on the Pentagon during the Viet Nam War.

How very appropriate, therefore, is the choice of March 17th. Those who will not learn from history are doomed to repeat the same mistakes (and props to whatever historical figure said that; I'm brain dead today and can't recall off-hand).

The Queen of Blonde Bloggers has the pictures from yesterday's anti-war protest in Washington, and I am sure that she will be posting them on the blog soon. Allow me a personal moment to says how great it was finally to meet in person: Jersey Cynic (you rock, girl), DBK (what kind of man walks around with AA batteries, to be whipped out at need?), and Mimus Pauly (we are so glad you came yesterday; see you at the train station on March 17th). And, of course, it was fabulous to see Liz, as always.

Labels:

Friday, January 26

Over at The Big Brass Blog...

...is a post entitled, Spambot Attack which I recommend to one and all (watchers included). In the post the Dark Wraith goes into some detail about how spambots have really picked up their activity lately. The comments are quite illuminating also but one in particular caught my eye. It reads thusly:

"Oh, and a by-the-way, my friend. We are being watched.
The Dark Wraith wishes everyone pleasant dreams."


To which I respond:
And I shall have them, friend Wraith, for I rest content with the reasonable certainty that these watchers also, will, with most of the rest of us, be deposited upon the beach like so much flotsam and jetsam when the killer tide comes in to sweep away humanity.
(Aside to the "watchers": You don't really trust those people you work for, do you?)


(EDIT. UPDATE):
One of our commenters, "nolocontendere", has responded to this post with such a fine piece of advice that I'm moving the comment up here to the main part of the post. Check out his appropriately named blogsite at PIGLIPSTICK. Here's his comment:

"I use this as a signature on all my emails. Anyone should feel free to swipe it if you'd like":

[Confidential to all US government personnel to whom this private letter is not addressed and who are reading it in the absence of a specific search warrant: You are violating the law and you are co-conspiring to subvert the Constitution that you are sworn to defend. You can either refuse to commit this crime, or you can expect to suffer criminal sanctions in the future, when Constitutional government has been restored to the United States of America. I do not envy you for having to make this difficult choice, but I urge you to make it wisely.]

How Do I Hate Housework?

Let me count the ways.

I have guests coming this weekend (the ever lovely Blonde Liz and the charming Jersey Cynic), so I'm doing the right thing and cleaning my house. I generally don't mind vacuuming, washing the floors, changing the linens, or even cleaning the bathroom. I even don't mind changing the cat litter and taking out the garbage. But I hate, Hate, HATE dusting! I don't know why that is, but dusting just works my nerves. So, Liz and JC, forgive me, it may not get done.

What household chores do you absolutely detest?

The March Against The War Tomorrow

A bunch of us will be meeting up tomorrow morning at 10:30ish am in DC for the march. We're joining this contingent:

Blogger's MARCH!
January 27, 2007
From: 11:00 AM until 04:00 PM
I think we are meeting before 11 though.

LOCATION: Starbucks Coffee: Liberty Place 325 7th St NW Washington, DC 20004 (202) 628 5044 This is literally at the Archives/Navy Memorial stop on the DC Metro for those without transportation.
-------

From UnitedforPeace.org
Stay Informed and Take Action Help Build the Peace Movement

Labels:

Have You Been A Bad Girl?

Spanking should be practiced among consenting adults in privacy. Period. Some people in this day and age, still however feel that spanking should also be practiced between an adult and an unwilling child. "Spare the rod, spoil the child," is yet another biblical exhortation taken with gusto by those who only read the dirty parts of the bible- hence we have "corporal punishment," a nice way of saying it's ok to spank/smack/hit/beat the shit out of kids.

Some psychologists suggest that spanking is ok when it is not done in a moment of fury. They say that parents should wait until they are calm and then issue the punishment. I would imagine however that for a sane parent, once the fury is over, they wouldn't bother to hit to their kids if they managed to hold off in the first place.

California Assemblywoman Sally Lieber will propose a bill in the state of California next week that will make it a misdemeanor for anyone to use corporal punishment on children three years old and under. The shit is hitting the fan in California and nationwide. The discussion of spanking is back.

I seriously can't imagine a well adjusted person hitting a baby, but I do recall my aunt telling me to hit my son when he was 2 because he was touching things at my house. But no one in her family was well adjusted. She was so good to him, so generous and loving... I was simply shocked that she would suggest such a thing. And I told her so.

Two opinion pieces in USA Today concern spanking. In To spank or not to spank? the author suggests that parental behavior bordering on abuse is already illegal and therefore the government should not meddle in family affairs and furthermore, it would be impossible to enforce (unless of course your baby is so brilliant that he can pick up the phone and call the cops.) He says that defenders of occassional spankings do not think that it causes psychological trauma and opponents of spanking say that it does cause harm. I think that it does cause emotional harm.

The author says that if spanking should be banned anywhere, it should be banned at schools. (I had no idea that corporal punishment was still allowed in schools but apparently it is in many states. Stop that!) I went to Catholic schools and we were hit and humiliated regularly. It didn't work. Most kids were used to being spanked for every little thing anyway and adopted the attitude that adults were control freaks. I say that if you are an "occassional" spanker you are already treading on thin ice towards becoming a regular spanker. Take it from someone who walked around with a book in her pants to soften the blows from the shoe or the belt.

I can still see in my mind's eye, my mom taking her shoe off as she ran after one of us or hitting me even harder if I put my arm up to block a strike, which is actually a natural and normal reaction when you detect that someone means you harm. "Don't you ever raise your hand to me! How dare you! Now you are REALLY going to get it!"

In Spare the rod, save the child the author, Kerby T. Alvy, a defender of this new bill in California, reports that 16 countries have banned spanking and the US should follow suit because "spanking, slapping or hitting - is violence, defined as acts carried out with the intention of causing physical pain. By banning its use with children, they take the most basic stand against violence that any society can." It couldn't hurt to ban the spanking of babies, those 3 years old or under, but it seems unfeasible to enforce it when it occurs in one's home.

I just had a flash back while writing this. After my brother was adopted, for years a woman, Mrs Beardsly from the adoption agency, would visit regularly to see how we were doing. We were admonished to be on our best behavior and we were yelled at, belittled and spanked in the days and hours leading up to her visit to ensure that we looked like the happiest and most well behaved family ever. By her last visit, I had figured out what this was all about and we sure fooled the authorities.

I grew up being hit and yelled at regularly. I think it was due to my mother's eastern European background where lashing out at someone else in frustration and in the heat of the moment was considered acceptable. She enjoyed smacking me "for nothing" in front of company and everyone would laugh. The adults were rather loaded at the time. But that's another story.

When I grew older my mom told me horror stories of how her father beat her and her 4 sisters regularly. I asked her if it was because I was adopted that she felt free to smack me for every little thing I ever did. She said no, that she would have hit me if I was her own flesh and blood (and maybe harder.) I believed her and still do. She was the nicest of the 5 sisters.

According to my cousins, the natural children of my mother's sisters, they too were beaten regularly and some reported even more violent beatings by both parents especially if their father was Italian. Their fathers enjoyed throwing them down the stairs, something that my brother and I missed out on fortunately. This explains the substance abuse issues of my relatives, their relationship issues and that they are lifelong members of the "Who's Who of Prozak and Lithium" with arrest records galore. My brother died very young (20) of an overdose of booze and drugs after he got out of rehab (it was either that or go to jail.) He had started abusing drugs at 12. My father was raised in a more civilized, well to do family and he preferred diplomacy over violence although he wasn't around enough to save my brother. My cousins on his side of the family, who were very well behaved, reported no beatings in their childhoods. They all grew up to be successful and well adjusted with no episodes of substance abuse or failed relationships. I followed in his footsteps and opted to stop the madness and discontinue the tradition of losing one's temper and acting out in violence (unless of course someone attacked me first.) My cousins on the violent side of the family report that they do not hit their kids. They had enough violence growing up. I did too. I never hit anyone.

Do you think that this bill is worthwhile, even if it just brings to light the fact that people are hitting babies? Should it extend further to older children? Are the laws prohibiting child abuse strong enough as they stand?

Thursday, January 25

What Mythical Beast Are you?


I am a Unicorn.

You're a unicorn. You're very pure and innocent. Almost everyone loves you and you love almost everyone. You may be naive to the point of gullibility. You're pretty much incapable of violence, the exception being when someone you love is threatened. While your intentions are nothing but good, some might call you a "straight-edger." Your alignment is EXTREMELY *good*.

Not sure about that "pure and innocent" stuff, but dead bang on with the violence thing.

What mythical beast are you? Take the quiz here.

Hat tip to the every lovely and entertaining Shakespeare's Sister.

You'll Probably Want to Shoot Yourself By the Elections Next Year...

The right wing smear machine is at it in full speed.

I don't watch cable news as you know. My delicate constitution cannot abide it, but co-blogger Billydoom watches regularly and tells me what the big stories are so that I can look them up in print without having to subject myself to their faces and voices. I do occassionally watch Keith Olbermann, but he shows clips of those who upset my mental feng shui.

As if the "Osama Obama" and the "Hussein" didn't smear Barack Obama enough on the cable "news" channels, John Gibson at Faux News has been pounding an unsubstantiated "news" story from a website, InsightMag.com, controlled by their very own Sun Myung Moon claiming that Hillary Clinton outed Senator Obama's childhood education at a madrassa/Muslim school in Indonesia.

Lush Bimbo claims that this couldn't be a Republican smear because the Republicans wouldn't have the guts to smear someone like this- it has to be the work of Hillary. This was Gibson's "big story." His "big story" is based on the lamest of evidence that Obama was trained by radical terrorist Muslims, but nevertheless, Gibson feels that he must nip Obama's popularity in the bud at any cost.

Highlights of the smear campaign from Media Matters:

Terry Holt, Rethuglican strategist with John Gibson: "This was either a despicable act by an absolutely ruthless Clinton political machine -- we know that they are capable of doing this. But I also thought, you know, it wasn't directly linked to Hillary Clinton." Holt suggested that Obama was behind his own smear tactic to get the story out of the way early in the campaign and also suggested and rightly so that a madrassa was not a radical Muslim school 40 years ago.
So even if it isn't true that Hillary is behind all this and if it isn't true that Obama was educated by terrorists...
John Gibson will not let the story die: "Americans have a visceral reaction to the word 'madrassa.' In our world, a madrassa's where zealots train your Muslim kids to hate America, to hate the West, and to be killers.."
Conservative talk show host Lee Rodgers: "According to Muslim law, Islamic law, the penalty for leaving the faith is death. Today, Barack Obama proclaims his adherence to the Christian faith, he's a member of a church in Chicago -- they say he's not a regular churchgoer, but he's a member -- but will this make him a potential death target?"
It was also suggested by the right wing spin machine that Hillary also leaked a story about Obama's past drug use. Notice how the machine packs a one two punch but smearing Obama and blaming it on Clinton?

The media matters article has quotes from right wing smear conservative talk show hosts that will make your blood curl. Facts and investigative journalism be damned.
John Gibson: "Two days ago, we did a story about Barack Obama's dirty little secret -- he smokes cigarettes. I got a lot of angry email from the "how dare you" variety. After all, angry emailers said, this is old news. Everybody knows he smokes, and what difference does it make, anyway?

"Well, not everybody knows, number one. (So he will make sure that everyone knows but he won't mention that the first lady cannot quit smoking and that many, many members of congress also smoke.) And number two, many people do care if a person is a smoker. Some people view smoking as a character weakness. (So he will make sure that everyone knows but he won't mention that the first lady cannot quit smoking and that many, many members of congress also smoke.) I used to be a smoker, and I know what people think about smokers. But smoking cigarettes is a nothingburger compared to what Hillary's people are reported to be doing to Obama. (He will continue to drive home the unsubstantiated rumor despite debunking and even if it is fully debunked, he will still report it as news that they once thought that Hillary was behind it and that even if it isn't true, Obama is a Muslim terrorist.)

The whole story was debunked by CNN, but John Gibson refuses to back down. From Think Progess:
"On his radio show this week, Gibson refused to back down. He claimed the CNN reporter who debunked the false report “probably went to the very madrassa” as Obama. Gibson implied that CNN’s report had covered up religious extremism at the school:

GIBSON: The whole point of this story last week, and, you know, Blitzer’s just been on their air with some update on this, right?

HOST: Yeah, he sent a reporter out there.

GIBSON: Yeah, cause they got a reporter in Indonesia, probably went to the very madrassa, now works for CNN. But that reporter went out there, and what did they see when they went to the madrassa where Barack Obama went to school?

HOST: Kids playing volleyball.

GIBSON: Playing volleyball, right. They didn’t see them in any terrorist training camps?

HOST: No.

GIBSON: No. Um, but they probably didn’t show them in their little lessons where they’re bobbing their heads and memorizing the Koran.

HOST: I didn’t see any tape of that, no.

GIBSON: No, no, no, you didn’t see that."



UPDATE January 29th: Who is behind this false story? From the NY Times: Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even if It’s False

May I not lose my sense of humor during the campaign.

Labels:

Wednesday, January 24

going public to keep it private?

When John Ashcroft was Attorney General he requested the medical records of women who had late-term abortions. People with sense realized that medical records and indeed whether a woman opted for an abortion are private. The entire basis of Roe v. Wade is that government cannot place restrictions on a woman's right to an abortion in the first trimester. That means record keeping, intimidation, or asking a woman if she had an abortion.

Abortion, the Supreme Court reasoned, is a private matter.

He wouldn't even need a subpoena if Ms. Magazine cons American women into signing a list that touts the signatories as not only pro-choice but active participants.

Again this solicitation came in my e-mail and I share it with you:
In commemorating Roe v. Wade, Ms. magazine is delivering thousands of names from our "We Had Abortions" petition to President Bush, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and other U.S. Representatives and Senators. These brave women lent their names to the continuing struggle to protect our reproductive freedom. Top decision makers will see that thousands of women can personally attest to the necessity and importance of safe, legal, and accessible abortions.

Join these brave women. Send a letter to your Representative and Senators now.

We recognized that today, during a time in which local, state, and national attacks on abortion rights are not uncommon and social stigmas surrounding abortion persist, women and men still need to speak out in support of reproductive freedom.

The response to the new Ms. petition has been overwhelming. Women have expressed gratitude for the opportunity to share their stories and to hear that they are not alone. Women of all ages from every state in the nation signed, showing their desire to preserve the legal right to abortion for future generations.

Our voices are making a difference. Join us by sending a letter to your Representative and Senators.

For Women's Health and Lives,

Eleanor Smeal
Yes and those government officials will know who had an abortion because these women were conned into believing that if they gave their medical history to the government it will somehow protect their rights to privacy.

This is patently ridiculous. And dangerous.

Women do not need to have an abortion to attest to the value of the right to control their own bodies and reproductive capabilities. And a woman does not need to attest to her most private decision to have power. And if Ms. wants to show that they can rally women, why should men sign the petition? They don't get pregnant. Should they say, "I paid for my girlfriend's abortion? I drove her to the clinic. Aren't I a mensch."

How is a woman's opinion or political power more valuable if she had an abortion?

Women inherently embody the obvious reason to support abortion: no government should be able to tell a woman that she must be pregnant. Government does not tell men that they must father children. Government cannot tell women that they must be mothers. A woman either has control over her uterus or she is not equal to men. A woman either can control her body or she gives her body to the government and then ultimately to men.

Ms. Magazine is being disingenuous when it uses women's bodies to further a political agenda. In order to make Ms. a force on the political stage a woman may sign this petition and receive harassing phone calls, criticism or worse at work, from her "friends," from her loved ones. Is Ms. going to help women deal with the consequences of naming their own names?

If abortion need not be private then why not publish women's names who are pregnant. Let people call them and tell them that they must give birth. Make sure that they are weighing all their options. Why is Ms. promoting abortion the way that hair coloring is sold. We used to say only our hair dressers knew for sure.

Why should we air our most private decisions in public? In this age of television confessions and kidnapping victims telling their stories to television personalities before they tell their stories to prosecutors--see if they can get a conviction against the monster of the month in Missouri now--I suppose we should tell everyone about our vaginae and uteri. Ms. used to promote the notion that women were more than their body parts.

Pretty soon it'll be easier to tell who we're NOT at war with:

US plane 'bombed Somalia targets'"

"US forces carried out a fresh air strike in southern Somalia on Monday, a senior US official has said."

Article in the BBC.

That was just this Monday. Earlier this month we blasted away at the Somalians and as this report says:
"Reports of civilian casualites run as high as 80 dead, with large numbers of cattle, goats and other livestock wiped out as well."

Neo-conservative pundits have been heard to say, "Why do liberals hate America"?
I would counter that question with one of my own: "Why do George Bush and the neo-conservatives hate every living thing on earth"?

Prehistoric Shark Appears Off Japan

I'm sure you've all heard about it by now, but I'll put the link to the article in the comment section just in case you want to know more

TIMZ

Keep your eyes and ears on this young man. His lyrics are amazing and while I personally am not a huge fan of rap, I will be buying this album. Tommy Hanna (aka TiMZ) is an Iraqi-American who is articulate and timely, his video IRAQ is one that must be seen.

His My Space page has some basic info and a few video, or you can see it here.

"There is a war going outside, no birds in the air, just bullets that fly"

He goes on to comment about how Iraq is part of the cradle of civilization and how the Abrahamic faiths all have roots in Iraq, how antiquities are being destroyed, humans are being destroyed and how 'America the beautiful' has been abused and how the troop are being used to add fuel to the fire. It is a timely and excellent song that needs to become viral and infect the net and hopefully open more eyes to what has happened and is still happening.

The Virgin Mary Smack-Down

Yep, even the Blessed Mother has a response to the SOTU address, she stopped by the Magic Meadow and gave a message to a few peasants.

The State of the Union

Randy Newman style, from a song soon to be released on line:

A Few Words in Defense of Our Country
By Randy Newman

I’d like to say a few words
In defense of our country
Whose people aren’t bad nor are they mean
Now the leaders we have
While they’re the worst that we’ve had
Are hardly the worst this poor world has seen

Let’s turn history’s pages, shall we?

Take the Caesars for example
Why within the first few of them
They had split Gaul into three parts
Fed the Christians to the lions
And burned down the City
And one of ’em
Appointed his own horse
Consul of the Empire
That’s like vice president or something
That’s not a very good example, is it?
But wait, here’s one, the Spanish Inquisition
They put people in a terrible position

I don’t even like to think about it
Well, sometimes I like to think about it

Just a few words in defense of our country
Whose time at the top
Could be coming to an end
Now we don’t want their love
And respect at this point is pretty much out of the question
But in times like these
We sure could use a friend

Hitler. Stalin.
Men who need no introduction
King Leopold of Belgium. That’s right.
Everyone thinks he’s so great
Well he owned The Congo
He tore it up too
He took the diamonds, he took the gold
He took the silver
Know what he left them with?
Malaria

A president once said,“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself”
Now it seems like we’re supposed to be afraid
It’s patriotic in fact and color coded
And what are we supposed to be afraid of?
Why, of being afraid
That’s what terror means, doesn’t it?
That’s what it used to mean

The end of an empire is messy at best
And this empire is ending
Like all the rest
Like the Spanish Armada adrift on the sea
We’re adrift in the land of the brave
And the home of the free
Goodbye. Goodbye. Goodbye.

I luvs me some Randy Newman.

Caption anyone?

Highlights from Jim Webb

Jim Webb's response to POTUS' SOTU address was pretty good. I liked how he compared this president to past presidents, when faced with similar situations. Presidents who did something about it. They happened to be Republican presidents. The transcript is here.

Bush says the economy is strong. It is if you're wealthy. Bush says that we will win the mismanaged war. But what does he know?
Webb: In the early days of our republic, President Andrew Jackson established an important principle of American-style democracy that we should measure the health of our society not at its apex, but at its base. Not with the numbers that come out of Wall Street, but with the living conditions that exist on Main Street. We must recapture that spirit today.
...
Regarding the economic imbalance in our country, I am reminded of the situation President Theodore Roosevelt faced in the early days of the 20th century. America was then, as now, drifting apart along class lines. The so-called robber barons were unapologetically raking in a huge percentage of the national wealth. The dispossessed workers at the bottom were threatening revolt.

Roosevelt spoke strongly against these divisions. He told his fellow Republicans that they must set themselves as resolutely against improper corporate influence on the one hand as against demagogy and mob rule on the other. And he did something about it.

As I look at Iraq, I recall the words of former general and soon-to-be President Dwight Eisenhower during the dark days of the Korean War, which had fallen into a bloody stalemate. "When comes the end?" asked the general who had commanded our forces in Europe during World War II. And as soon as he became president, he brought the Korean War to an end.

These presidents took the right kind of action, for the benefit of the American people and for the health of our relations around the world. Tonight we are calling on this president to take similar action, in both areas. If he does, we will join him. If he does not, we will be showing him the way."
I have to admit that I could not watch the chimperor (I tend to get sweaty and gag). I read it afterward. Hat tip to Billydoom who called me when it was over so that I could watch Jim Webb.

Meanwhile, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi had this to say about the SOTU (among other things):
"Unfortunately, tonight the President demonstrated he has not listened to Americans' single greatest concern: the war in Iraq. The overwhelming majority of Americans, military leaders, and a bipartisan coalition in Congress oppose the President's plan to escalate the war. Democrats, Republicans, and the bipartisan Iraq Study Group have offered the President a plan to end our open-ended commitment to Iraq, transition the U.S. mission, and begin the phased redeployment of American troops. While the President continues to ignore the will of the country, Congress will not ignore this President's failed policy. His plan will receive an up-or-down vote in both the House and the Senate, and we will continue to hold him accountable for changing course in Iraq."
The forecast for this Saturday in DC is 49º. This is the day that hopefully hundreds of thousands of Americans will put their money where their mouth is. March On Washington
I hope that congress will be paying attention.

Tuesday, January 23

Ya Gotta Hand It To Her

Shown below, allegedly, is an actual letter that was sent to a bank by an 86 year-old woman. The bank manager though it was amusing enough to have it published in the New York Times.

"Dear Sir.

I am writing to thank you for bouncing my check which I endeavored to pay my plumber last month.

By my calculations, three nanoseconds must have elapsed between his presenting the check and the arrival in my account of the funds needed to honor it.

I refer, of course, to the automatic monthly deposit of my entire pension, an arrangement which, I admit, has been in place for only eight years.

You are to be commended for seizing the brief window of opportunity, and also for debiting my account $30 by way of penalty for the inconvenience caused to your bank. My thankfulness springs from the manner in which this incident has caused me to rethink my errant financial ways.

I noticed that whereas I personally answer your telephone calls and letters when I try to contact you, I am confronted by the impersonal, overcharging, pre-recorded faceless entity which your bank has become. From now on I like you choose only to deal with a flesh and blood person.

My mortgage and loan repayments will therefore and hereafter no longer be automatic, but will arrive at your bank by check, addressed personally and confidentially to an employee at your bank whom you must nominate.

Be aware that it is an offense under the Postal Act for any other person to open such an envelope. Please find attached an Application Contact which I require your chosen employee to complete.

I am sorry it runs to eight pages but in order that I know as much about him or her as your bank knows about me, there is no alternative.

Please note that all copies of his/her medical history must be countersigned by a Notary Public and the mandatory details of his her financial situation (income,debts, assets and liabilities) must be accompanied by documented proof.

In due course at MY CONVENIENCE, I will issue your employee with a PIN number which he/she must quote in dealing with me. I regret that it cannot be shorter than 28 digits but, again, I have modeled it on the number of button presses required of me to access my account balance on your phone bank service.

As they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery! Let me level the playing field even further. When you call me, press the button as follows:
IMMEDIATELY AFTER DAILING PRESS THE STAR (*) BUTTON FOR ENGLISH
*1. To make an appointment to see me.
*2. To query a missed payment.
*3. To transfer the call to my living room in case I am there.
*4. To transfer the call to my bedroom in case I'm sleeping.
*5. To transfer to my toilet in case I am attending nature.
*6. To transfer to my cell phone if I am not at home.
*7. To leave a message on my computer a password to access my computer is required. Password will be communicated to you at a later date to that Authorized Contact mentioned earlier.
*8. To return to the main menu and to listen to option 1 through 7.
*9. To make a general complaint or injury the contact will be then put on hold pending the attention of my automated answering service.
*10. this is a second to press* for English.

While this may, on occasion, involve a lengthy wait, uplifting music will play for the duration of the call.

(Remember-- This was written by a 86-year-old woman. Which goes to show you that it's best to not tapper off, and yes, you can not always beat City Hall, but you sure as hell can arm wrestle them.

Oh My!!!

Turdblossom just got thrown under the bus.

Hee hee hee. Haw haw haw.

Could it happen to a nicer guy?

Now it's Cheney's and Rummy's fault too

Is anyone keeping track of McCain's flip flops?
Maybe we ought to compile a list and keep it up to date... just in case.

There IS a Bright Side To This

I didn't post anything about this yesterday because, well, I didn't want to depress anyone. Yesterday, January 22, 2007 was the most depressing day of the year and dubbed "Blue Monday."
Apparently if you were "blue" yesterday, your credit card bills from Christmas arrived, the weather sucked, your new year's resolutions tanked or you are just fed up with the short days and long nights, not to mention, Mondays usually suck if you are off on weekends.

I promised a bright side- there is no other direction to go than up.
;)

SOTU Will NOT Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Notice in the article below how Tony Snowjob answers concerns about climate change.


CEOs Urge Bush to Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions
By Steven Mufson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 23, 2007; A06

On the eve of the State of the Union address, the chief executives of 10 major corporations urged President Bush to embrace mandatory ceilings on U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in order to stem climate change.

But yesterday White House spokesman Tony Snow said that binding caps on carbon dioxide emissions would not be part of the president's proposals tonight. And a member of the corporate delegation said that last week the White House canceled a meeting with the executives that had been scheduled for yesterday morning.

"The President has always believed, when it comes to climate change, that the best way to achieve reductions is through innovation," Snow said, "and to figure out ways to come up with energy sources that are going to meet our economy's constant demand for energy, and at the same time, do it in a way that's going to be friendly for the environment."

There has been widespread speculation about what Bush might say about climate change tonight. Several legislative proposals have emerged in Congress with different ways for addressing climate change.

Major corporate leaders have been changing their position on climate change for the past year or two, and many of them are convinced that some form of regulation of or tax on carbon emissions is inevitable. With many states talking about coming up with their own laws, corporate leaders have started to urge the federal government to establish a nationwide standard.

"We can and must take prompt action to establish a coordinated, economy-wide market-driven approach to climate protection," the executives said in a letter to Bush. In an interview later, Jeffry E. Sterba, chairman of PNM Resources, a New Mexico utility, said that it was better to act now than to be forced to act in a "precipitous way" later.

The executives support a system that would create a cap on emissions, give allocations to companies based on past emissions and allow firms to trade allocations to meet gradually declining emission targets. The system, similar to one being used in Europe, would have far-reaching implications for utility rates, power plant construction, energy efficiency and American automobiles.

The executives' plan would slow the growth in greenhouse gases over the next five years, then reverse that growth and cut annual emissions by 70 percent to 90 percent of today's levels in 15 years.

Jeffrey Immelt, chairman of General Electric, pointing to initiatives in California and a group of Northeastern states, said "this is happening already." In addition to Immelt and Sterba, the group included the chief executives of Lehman Brothers Holdings, PG&E, Alcoa, Caterpillar, BP America, Duke Energy, DuPont and FPL Group.

Snow said that he thought Bush's proposals "address in a comprehensive and realistic way concerns about greenhouse emissions, and also their primary sources."

The Pink Elephant Is Still In The Building.

In 1999, responding to questions about his use of drugs and alcohol, George Bush told the Washington Post, "Well, I don't think, I had an addiction. You know it's hard for me to say. I've had friends who where, ya know, very addicted and they required hitting bottom (to start) going to AA. I don't think that was my case."

This not only confirmed my worst fears but adds to them. That kind of rationalization, willfulness, and arrogance are so classic of an alcoholic. Never mind the bottomless pit of failures and your total disregard of reality, Mr. C-Student. Your lack of intellectual depth or curiosity does not let you off the hook.

While we see a failed war, the waste of "reconstruction" the growing pile of the dead, the spoiled Frat boy, sees democracy. The undeclared war totally dominates the man as thought that's what he gains importance from , not having to solve actual problems, but it makes him self-important. God forbid there be any objectivity . He cannot see the world for what it is. He not only rejects reality, he has no sympathy for it. Reality is something that happens so far outside his belief system, it doesn't effect him. He stands firm in his beliefs, he stands on his head. It boggles the mind.

"I believe in what I'm doing."
That means he doesn't have to actually think about what he's doing. So it's not like Bush won't change his mind, he can't. He is totally inflexible and completely inflexible. It's all or nothing!

Bush has also said, "That he had pity for those who attack him" Oh really? Imagine being patronized by Bush. Well, you are. Meet us--the American people---the victims of the sublime smugness of sublime ignorance.

Tonight instead of listening to the State of the Union address I would suggest that the nation instead attend an Al-anon meeting.

Monday, January 22

Some Interesting Headlines:

All of a sudden, Ed Brown has a lot of friends
Concord Monitor, NH - 10 hours ago
"As Brown declared that Plainfield might become another Waco, three strangers huddled in his heated garage and emphasized that they had no interest in ..."

Man skips tax trial, holes up in house; jury deliberating
Boston Globe, MA - Jan 18, 2007
"A "Don't Tread on Me" flag was hung on a tree and e-mails and Web sites asked, "Will Plainfield be another Waco?" There was no sign of any law enforcement..."

More at GoogleNews.


"Up jumped the swagman and sprang into the billabong...."

"US brings in new passport rules"

"New rules go into effect on Tuesday requiring citizens of Canada, Mexico and Bermuda to produce a passport on arrival by air in the United States.

"American citizens returning home from the three countries will also have to show their passports."


BBC NEWS

King George's Cold, Cold Heart

You may have heard about King George's Saturday radio address concerning health care. His proposals are simply out of this world.

What does Paul Krugman have to say?

Gold-Plated Indifference
President Bush’s Saturday radio address was devoted to health care, and officials have put out the word that the subject will be a major theme in tomorrow’s State of the Union address. Mr. Bush’s proposal won’t go anywhere. But it’s still worth looking at his remarks, because of what they say about him and his advisers.

On the radio, Mr. Bush suggested that we should “treat health insurance more like home ownership.” He went on to say that “the current tax code encourages home ownership by allowing you to deduct the interest on your mortgage from your taxes. We can reform the tax code, so that it provides a similar incentive for you to buy health insurance.”

Wow. Those are the words of someone with no sense of what it’s like to be uninsured.

Going without health insurance isn’t like deciding to rent an apartment instead of buying a house. It’s a terrifying experience, which most people endure only if they have no alternative. The uninsured don’t need an “incentive” to buy insurance; they need something that makes getting insurance possible.

Most people without health insurance have low incomes, and just can’t afford the premiums. And making premiums tax-deductible is almost worthless to workers whose income puts them in a low tax bracket.

Of those uninsured who aren’t low-income, many can’t get coverage because of pre-existing conditions — everything from diabetes to a long-ago case of jock itch. Again, tax deductions won’t solve their problem.

The only people the Bush plan might move out of the ranks of the uninsured are the people we’re least concerned about — affluent, healthy Americans who choose voluntarily not to be insured. At most, the Bush plan might induce some of those people to buy insurance, while in the process — whaddya know — giving many other high-income individuals yet another tax break.

While proposing this high-end tax break, Mr. Bush is also proposing a tax increase — not on the wealthy, but on workers who, he thinks, have too much health insurance. The tax code, he said, “unwisely encourages workers to choose overly expensive, gold-plated plans. The result is that insurance premiums rise, and many Americans cannot afford the coverage they need.”

Again, wow. No economic analysis I’m aware of says that when Peter chooses a good health plan, he raises Paul’s premiums. And look at the condescension. Will all those who think they have “gold plated” health coverage please raise their hands?

According to press reports, the actual plan is to penalize workers with relatively generous insurance coverage. Just to be clear, we’re not talking about the wealthy; we’re talking about ordinary workers who have managed to negotiate better-than-average health plans.

What’s driving all this is the theory, popular in conservative circles but utterly at odds with the evidence, that the big problem with U.S. health care is that people have too much insurance — that there would be large cost savings if people were forced to pay more of their medical expenses out of pocket.

The administration also believes, for some reason, that people should be pushed out of employment-based health insurance — admittedly a deeply flawed system — into the individual insurance market, which is a disaster on all fronts. Insurance companies try to avoid selling policies to people who are likely to use them, so a large fraction of premiums in the individual market goes not to paying medical bills but to bureaucracies dedicated to weeding out “high risk” applicants — and keeping them uninsured.

I’m somewhat skeptical about health care plans, like that proposed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, that propose covering gaps in the health insurance market with a series of patches, such as requiring that insurers offer policies to everyone at the same rate. But at least the authors of these plans are trying to help those most in need, and recognize that the market needs fixing.

Mr. Bush, on the other hand, is still peddling the fantasy that the free market, with a little help from tax cuts, solves all problems.

What’s really striking about Mr. Bush’s remarks, however, is the tone. The stuff about providing “incentives” to buy insurance, the sneering description of good coverage as “gold plated,” is right-wing think-tank jargon. In the past Mr. Bush’s speechwriters might have found less offensive language; now, they’re not even trying to hide his fundamental indifference to the plight of less-fortunate Americans.

Harry Blackmun, You Was Da Man

Today is Blogging for Choice Day, so allow me a moment to pay homage to the man who authored the Roe v. Wade decision.

When I was a first year law student, Harry Blackmun came to speak at my law school. (Possibly the only benefit of law school in the Nation's Capital is the access to people who work in the 'hood.) Justice Balckmun gave some introductory remarks and then opened the floor to questions, but before he did, he said, "I will not take questions regarding Roe v. Wade. All I will say is that the decision was correct when it was made, it is correct today, and it was the greatest step toward the liberation of women that this country has ever known."

Damn straight, Harry.

What do you think about this?

Sure, there are people in the world who are absolutely fed up with those who take advantage of the good will of others. I've had my moments of exasperation. But social justice is not simply black and white- and when it borders on "get with the program or get out of my face" mentality, especially coming from so-called "christians," we demonstrate that we have failed as a society.

It just seems to me that there are too many people in jail, too many children born who don't stand a chance of making it out of the fringes of society and too many people who work full time jobs and yet live in poverty- signs of a weak and sick society. Maybe you've seen the following before, but I hadn't seen it until this past weekend and discovered that a close relative was passing this around. (Boy you think you know someone...) It's harshly stated overall and there are some points which are downright mean. (I checked this out on the internet and it appears to be a somewhat popular email going around.) While people shouldn't expect that the world owes them a living, on the other hand, if we're a nation supposedly claiming to be avid followers of Jesus, we have totally missed the boat if "christians" espouse much of the following:

New Preamble to the Constitution:
This is probably the best e-mail I've seen in a long, long time. The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Aye from GA. This guy should run for President one day...

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters.

We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes. (This one is my pet peeve...get an education and go to work....don't expect everyone else to take care of you!)

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (lastly....)

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!!!!

Sunday, January 21

Hope this isn't Homeland Security money at work

There is a website that was started in 2006 that keeps track of trouble-making church goers. (Oxymoron or redundancy?) I was doing a little research on evangelists and came across it here. It is called Wolf Warning and it allows pastors to rate people from one, a minor annoyance, to ten, a "bona fide church-splitter". I may not have a file yet since the moon isn't blue that often but if I did it would probably be around a five and the comments would probably say that I am under the impression that there is a better chance of finding God in the garden on a Sunday morning than in church. It would probably also note that I sing the benediction wrong. What, it's NOT "As it was in the beginning is now and ever shall be, world without men. No men. No men?"

I'm going to go play with my Jesus dolls now and try not to think about how really scary the evangelists are. You are so right about that Liz.

"I want you to just let a wave of intolerance wash over you. I want you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good...Our goal is a Christian nation. We have a biblical duty, we are called on by God to conquer this country. We don't want equal time. We don't want pluralism.

Randall Terry

The Audacity of Hope

You know, I was a child of Watergate, which is to say I am highly cynical about politics, politicians, the state of the union, and all other things Washington. Still, every once in a while, I allow myself some hope, and today was one of those days, when I read this piece by William Friedkin on HuffPo.

Y'all know that I was highly skeptical of Jim Webb when he started his campaign. The best I could say of him then was that he wasn't Felix "Macaca" Allen. But, he started to grow on me, a bit like fungus. I listened more carefully and liked what I heard. I sent a little money to the campaign, and then I sent a little more. I volunteered some time, but not too much so that I was truly engaged. I maintained my emotional distance, not wanting my heart broken yet one more time, not wanting the disillusionment to set in.

I'm never too proud to admit when I might, just might, be wrong. I still need to see a little more "walking the talk" before that happens. But I'm paying more attention. The man my actually be a leader with some potential. We shall see. All I know right now is that a couple of the locks guarding my heart have opened.

I may not watch Our Delusional Leader's incoherent mumblings on Tuesday, but I damn sure will be watching the Democratic response.

Saturday, January 20

How to become a crack spider's bitch

I found this little snip posted by Mark Morford -- make sure to click on the article after watching the brief video -- a most excellent read:

Wait, you say this video clip is really old and has been around the blogosphere for ages? You say you saw it like, two years ago or something, which was even before YouTube existed and therefore is very nearly impossible unless you are so fantastically blog-hip that you have the gift of blog-o-prescience? You say there's even a follow-up article on the spider video's creator that's sort've a fascinating insight into a certified YouTube mini-phenom? Dude, that is like, so cool.
Posted By: Mark Morford (Email) | January 17 2007 at 12:23 PM

BIG COAL'S DIRTY MOVE -- By Jeff Goodell -- Rolling Stone 1/27/07

As the world heats up, the coal industry is racing to build more than 150 new power plants before Congress decides to crack down on global warming


"Like most stories about energy, corruption and greed, this one is centered in Texas. TXU, an electric-power company based in Dallas, has announced plans to build eleven new coal plants in Texas by 2011 -- a move that a trade publication calls "one of the most ambitious generation capacity expansions in recent power industry history" and whatayaknow -- the Nuge's best bud, govna RICK PERRY, was the one who "issued an executive order fast-tracking permits for the new power plants that TXU and other coal companies want to build."

In the article we learn about the AMAZING EFFORTS of Laura Miller, Mayor of Dallas, who is leading the fight to prevent these plants from going up. (Here's a related NPR story)

"Pissing off Miller was not a smart move. A former investigative journalist who got elected mayor by campaigning against her city's billionaire boys club, she is now taking aim at Big Coal. Miller, a mother of three, spends many of her evenings and weekends traveling to small towns in rural Texas near the sites of the proposed plants, urging residents to join the Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition, which she formed to make sure that citizens have a voice in the permit process."

Unfortunately, Laura Miller will not be seeking re-election. I am happy that she will be able to spend more time with her kids though.

I decided to take a quick look into the current Dallas political scene -- Who's running down there? I hope Laura Miller has inspired others to take over for her. Well, I stopped at this article -- JMJ!! Is Dallas really that large an area that they have a "North" and "South" thing going on? Is this some kind of family feud thing that goes way back? I know nothing about Texas. JR Ewing and GW Bush are the only associations I have with Texas...

Friday, January 19

Speaking of surges, this is the "real" surge:

"This week, the administration sent another aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf— the second to deploy in the region."

That's from this article at Yahoo news, the headline of which is rather interesting:
"Democrats warn Bush not to attack Iran"
(As if he could give a shit.)

The point is, the effort by buttfuckboy to have a 21,500 troop "surge" in Iraq is a smokescreen, a distraction, something to divert our attention AWAY from what is happening in the Persian Gulf with the U.S. NAVY.

Any of you whippersnappers ever see the 1959 movie or read the novel "On The Beach"? "Plot Outline: The residents of Australia after a global nuclear war must come to terms with the fact that all life will be destroyed in a matter of months." For some reason I recall one of the characters (Fred Astaire?) saying something about how drinking copious amounts of alcohol could delay the effects of radiation poisoning. Maybe I'll add a few cases of booze to my "survival supply stock". That way, just maybe, mine can be the last voice on earth cursing the mad demons of darkness that inhabit the halls of power.


UPDATE: BTW, the Chinese did blast a satellite with one of their missiles lately. It was one of their "old" satellites. Guess it was just "practice" though. Read about it at Voice of America. My question is: All that shit that's been falling to earth lately--Are those comets, asteroids, and meteorites, or pieces of flaming wreckage?

UPDATE 2:
Meteorite Down On Altai :: Russia-InfoCentre
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Dwarf planet 'becoming a comet'
Brightest comet in 40 years in Australian skies
Meteors over Wisconsin?
South of Scotland | 'Fireball' calls blamed on comet
CHILE´S SKIES LIGHT UP THIS WEEKEND WITH COMET MCNAUGHT

Got all these from the "Quirks and Quarks" section of Signs-of-the-Times.

Gonzo: ‘There Is No Express Grant of Habeas Corpus In The Constitution’

My dad fought in WWII against countries like the one ours is trying to be.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was playing the spin game again. It's a crying shame that the freaking Attorney General of the freaking United States of America, the only country on earth that God blesses regularly, would mess with the second most important writing in the world next to the holy bible. Gonzales was debating Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) about whether the Supreme Court’s ruling on Guantanamo detainees last year cited the constitutional right to habeas corpus.

From Think Progress:
GONZALES: ... The fact that the Constitution — again, there is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution. There is a prohibition against taking it away. But it’s never been the case, and I’m not a Supreme —

SPECTER: Now, wait a minute. Wait a minute. The constitution says you can’t take it away, except in the case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus, unless there is an invasion or rebellion?

GONZALES: I meant by that comment, the Constitution doesn’t say, “Every individual in the United States or every citizen is hereby granted or assured the right to habeas.” It doesn’t say that. It simply says the right of habeas corpus shall not be suspended except by —

SPECTER: You may be treading on your interdiction and violating common sense, Mr. Attorney General.
Oh dear. Why bring something like this up Mr Gonzalez unless you are attempting to pull the wool over someone's eyes?

Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution: “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

Also in Think Progress:

Col. Dwight H. Sullivan, the Chief Defense Counsel in the Office of Military Commissions, issued a statement yesterday criticizing the new rules unveiled by the Pentagon following the guidelines set by congress last year in the Military Commissions Act:
The rules appear carefully crafted to ensure than an accused can be convicted — and possibly executed — based on nothing but a coerced confession. The rules would allow an accused to be executed based on nothing but hearsay.

[…]

The rules’ broad protections for classified information threaten to swallow everything. These rules are particularly scary coming in the wake of new Guantánamo classification guidelines that make even the prisoners’ own name classified as ‘SECRET.’

The rules violate the principle that the jury shouldn’t be allowed to see anything that the defendant can’t see. Witnesses can be shielded so that the defendant can’t see them, but the jury can.
If we let them treat the so-called "bad guys" like this legally, maybe one day your neighbor or even you will be deemed a "bad guy" and they won't even have to prove it.

Some more Southern-style politics -- Perry & Nugent?

This is just too funny

Rocker Ted Nugent Performs At Texas Gov's Inaugural Ball


The comments after the Huffpo article are even funnier*

*"This is what happens when your family tree does not fork" - (a foxworthy quote)


Hours after Gov. Rick Perry kicked off his second full term in office, Ted Nugent helped him celebrate at a black-tie gala, but not all attendees were pleased by the rocker's performance.

Using machine guns as props, Nugent, 58, appeared onstage as the final act of the inaugural ball wearing a cutoff T-shirt emblazoned with the Confederate flag and shouting offensive remarks about non-English speakers, according to people who were in attendance.


COME ON Now WHO let Nugent in the door for this one -- WHO booked this performance??

Important Memo:

To Texas Jaye, Red State Blues, Flame, Jersey Cynic, Missouri Mule, Billydoom, NC Gal, and our fellow bloggers in the ethosphere:

Hey, you guys, Party Time! As Liz said in her last post, "We'll be visiting New England this weekend..."

Sooo, what's the old saying?: "While the cat's away, the mice will play". Let's rip up the joint! I'll whip up a batch of Bagne Caulda, somebody make sure to bring along a couple of jugs of Everclear, and don't forget the buttery flavored Wesson Oil and rubber sheets.

Bagne Caulda Recipe:
2-5 lbs. butter
Many cloves of garlic
Lotsa anchovies

Melt butter in sauce pan, mince garlic and anchovies, mix all together into horrible-looking grotesque viscous paste, and then dip French bread, crackers, or, just about anything (no, not body parts) and consume with gusto. If some dribbles down your chin and neck, it seems to enhance the flavor. Chase with a mixture of half Popov vodka and half Mad Dog 20-20 for full enjoyment.

What's a parent to do?

MySpace hit with online predator suits
NEW YORK - Four families have sued News Corp. and its MySpace social-networking site after their underage daughters were sexually abused by adults they met on the site, lawyers for the families said Thursday.
I don't know if you can blame a website for what your kids do. Can parents expect MySpace, a free service, to mind their children and determine who's a potential criminal? Even before the internet, we worried about our children's safety and we warned them about predators and not talking to strangers. We went to great lengths to make sure that our kids weren't walking home from school alone or left in possibly dangerous situations (well in my neighborhood we did.)

My 21 year old son brought some very attractive and alluring MySpace pictures to my attention just last weekend. They were his 14 year old cousins- my nieces. He was worried for their safety because they are very trusting. We'll be visiting New England this weekend and he'll talk to them and I'll talk to their moms.

Colbert vs OLielly

In case you missed it last night, Stephen Colbert appeared on O'Lielly and O'Lielly appeared on Colbert. Pretty funny stuff.

Thursday, January 18

Just received this in e-mail:

BREAKING NEWS: Major New “End the War” Bill Introduced

Take Action Now / Forward this Email

Yesterday, Reps. Lynn Woolsey, Barbara Lee and Maxine Waters introduced H.R. 508: The Bring the Troops Home and Iraq Sovereignty Restoration Act, taking up the President’s challenge to come up with a plan for Iraq. Thirteen additional members have already signed on as co-sponsors. The bill would bring our troops home in six months.

It’s up to PDA activists to spread the word – to friends, relatives, co-workers, other activists…and to media of every type, including independent blogs and websites. H. R 508 is a concrete plan – not just a symbolic, non-binding resolution – that progressives and Democrats can rally around.

Email your member of Congress
Capwiz.com (your member)

Email Speaker Pelosi
Capwiz.com(Pelosi)

Join Progressive Democrats of America
pdamerica.org

Authorized and Paid for by Progressive Democrats of America.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

I've just been invited by phone to attend:

(From his website):

Town Hall Discussion - Bush's plan to escalate the war in Iraq
Iowa City, Iowa
Jan 20, 2007
Iowa Memorial Union, University of Iowa Campus (at the corner of North Madison and Jefferson Streets)
John Edwards will visit Iowa City and hold a town hall at the University of Iowa to discuss President Bush’s plan to escalate the war in Iraq. Edwards has called on Congress to block funding for an escalation of troops.

JohnEdwards.com

Caption Time

Help, I’m Surrounded by Jerks

By STEPHANIE ROSENBLOOM
NYTimes - January 18, 2007



Here's the link and I will also post it, in full, below.

Because --"I'm a little verklempt" here.

Seems there's a slew of new "expert advice" books and seminars out on how to deal with jerks. Since I've shared a cube or two with quite a few doozies over the years, I can relate. I also feel that I have empathy mastered and my heart goes out (ALL THE TIME) to those who are truly in a mess. The majority ARE jerks, and whiners, and complainers though. I think I should write a quick manual on how to make some cute STFU signs. Maybe it would inspire some employees to show their HR department how to make some clever GTFOH! (get the fuck outta here!) signs.

I'm sick of putting up with jerks. Now, someday I can look forward to attending a seminar "Dealing With Difficult People and Difficult Situations." Aren't these people enough of a drain on the workplace as it is? I am a caring person - really! Sometimes these phychologists -- I don't know...Well, you know what they say B.S., M.S, Piled Higher and deeper. (no offense psychologists). This really has me quite verklempt....


CERTAIN mortals have the power to sink hearts and sour moods with lightning speed. The hysterical colleague. The meddlesome neighbor. The crazy in-law. The explosive boss. A mélange of cantankerous individuals, they are united by a single achievement: They make life miserable.

You call them jerks, dolts and nitwits. Psychologists call them “difficult people.” In fact they are difficult in so many ways that they have been classified into species like the Complainer, the Whiner and the Sniper, to name but three.

But in an age when no problem goes unacknowledged or unaddressed, living with such people is no longer the only choice. Instead, an industry of books and seminars has sprung up, not to help the difficult change their maddening ways, but to help the rest of us cope with them.

Two decades ago there were only a handful of books offering advice on how to defang the dears. Today there are scores of seminars, workbooks and multimedia tools to help people co-exist with those they wish did not exist.

In the spring, Career Press is to publish “151 Quick Ideas to Deal With Difficult People” by Carrie Mason-Draffen. But numerous resources are already on the market, including the succinctly titled “Since Strangling Isn’t an Option” by Sandra A. Crowe.

Next month the Career and Professional Development Center at Duke Law School will for the first time offer a workshop called Dealing With Conflict and Difficult People. In September the negotiation program in Harvard Law School’s executive education series will present a seminar called Dealing With Difficult People and Difficult Situations. And the Graduate School, United States Department of Agriculture, which offers continuing education classes, has scheduled more than half a dozen seminars entitled Positive Approaches to Difficult People for this year.

The lessons include common sense (talk it out and put yourself in their shoes), character by character tactical road maps and something that the victims of the difficult don’t want to hear: they might be the problem.

Nan Harrison, the vice president of training resources and publication sales for CareerTrack, which every month presents more than 50 public “difficult people” seminars across the country, attributes the increased popularity of such workshops to a desire to improve workplace skills in a time of corporate downsizing and a more competitive job market. “I think the stakes have gotten higher for everyone,” she said.

Other conflict-resolution specialists suggested an unexpected reason for the increasing interest: A post-9/11 desire to make peace, even if it is merely with the wet blanket in the adjoining cubicle.

Whatever the reason, “difficult people” gurus are in demand. That is perhaps because everyone knows at least one person who can set the blood boiling. They can be found in corporate offices, on co-op boards, in church choirs and on university faculties. They are the office Cassandra who predicts doom for every project her team initiates, the intimidating boss for whom nothing is ever good enough and the unreasonable receptionist at the motor vehicles office.

“They’re very disruptive, these people,” said Brook Zelcer, a tennis pro and an English teacher in Westwood, N.J.

On the tennis court, Mr. Zelcer has been served up his share of overbearing and impatient parents. One stood out as truly difficult: The father who gave his wife play-by-plays of his daughter’s matches on his cellphone, disrupted games by shouting from the stand, encouraged his daughter to cheat during matches and drove her to tears.

Mr. Zelcer tried to control the father, but all he got was a phone call from the man insisting he loved his child. “That’s one of the reasons I quit coaching,” Mr. Zelcer said. “I couldn’t deal with these people.”

For Ann Rothman, a Manhattan real estate agent, her difficult person is a know-it-all friend who simply cannot be pleased.

“She’s a superior human being, and she comes from a superior area — Berkeley, Calif.,” Ms. Rothman said. “She has told me many times that there are only two places to get good food. One of them is Berkeley, and one of them is France. And France is only second to Berkeley.”

Difficult people are not harmless. The impact of slowing productivity or creating unhappy customers and vendors is immeasurable, unknowable and often a company’s biggest cost, said Ms. Harrison of CareerTrack, paraphrasing W. Edwards Deming, a management consultant.

Yet, some scholars say, the problem is not the difficult people themselves. It is you.

“There’s a good quote from the Talmud,” said Bruce Elvin, an associate dean and the director of the Career and Professional Development Center at Duke Law School. “ ‘We do not see the world as it is. We see the world as we are.’ That really in my view sums this topic up.”

He and others say that rather than seeing the office curmudgeon or the post office nitpicker as the sum of their most wretched behavior, it is better to think of them as full people, even to empathize with them, if only to maintain some sense of control.

Easier said than done. But psychologists say people exhibit difficult behavior because they have a need that is not being met. Understanding that need — a colleague may be snappish, for instance, because his personal life is in turmoil — helps take the sting out of his or her actions, they say.

“Some people really are bad people,” said Mark I. Rosen, a social scientist at Brandeis and the author of “Thank You for Being Such a Pain: Spiritual Guidance for Dealing With Difficult People,” “but I don’t think the percentage is as high as people think it is.” Instead, he said, “most people fall into the category of incompetent or oblivious.”

Several authors think it is useful to characterize infuriating people into types and prescribe ways to deal with them, as Robert M. Bramson did in 1981 in “Coping With Difficult People,” one of the first popular books on the topic. Its overarching lesson is to find a way to communicate with these people because they are not going away. Dr. Bramson lists seven difficult behavior types: Hostile-Aggressives, Complainers, Silent and Unresponsives, Super-Agreeables, Know-It-All Experts, Negativists and Indecisives.

These authors say that after categorizing the difficult behavior, you can take steps to rein it in. For example, Dr. Rick Brinkman, a seminar leader and an author of “Dealing With People You Can’t Stand: How to Bring Out the Best in People at Their Worst,” calls one category Whiners. These people rattle off an endless loop of complaints and must be coaxed into problem solving.

He suggests listening to them and letting them vent. Chances are, he said, their complaints will be vague and exaggerated. When they begin to repeat their gripes, summarize for them what they have said. Then begin asking specific questions.

“You have to keep asking them what they think they should do,” Dr. Brinkman said, to press for resolutions. You might finally say something outrageous, like “What if we were to kill everyone in the other department?”

The literature on difficult people often focuses on the workplace, but business scholars say that neither your department nor “the other department” has a corner on the difficult people market. Rather, as Richard Freedman, the distinguished service professor of management at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business of New York University, put it, “Difficult people are distributed evenly throughout society.”

“How many mother-in-law stories have you heard?” he asked. “It’s not disproportionate in the workplace, but often what it is, is that the stakes are so big for people. Career is at the center of people’s lives.”

Workplaces are competitive environments comprising individuals with disparate styles of working and communicating. With so many temperaments thrown together, every office is a powder keg.

For instance, there are those who think they are powerless, that their ideas go unheard or are dismissed and who believe they are not valued, feelings that can turn into chronically difficult behavior.

In the end, the specialists say, we cannot control other people, only our response to them. Then again, we can always let nature take its course.

“Having somebody who is really difficult can actually be good for the workplace,” said Jo-Ellen Pozner, a researcher in the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern. “If everyone really hates this one person, it becomes the basis of social bonding for the rest of the group.”

Republic of North America?

Remember this illustration that made the rounds after the 2004 election?
The Toronto Star has an article Canada in 2020: The Republic of Northern America

It's an interesting read if nothing else. I guess things aren't so peachy in Canada either. The writer had to simplify the issues in order to fit them into a newspaper article so it's not all inclusive. He wonders if the northern US would fuse with parts of Canada one day. It could happen, if southern evangelicals continue to be a major political force, he surmises. John McCain's popularity has tanked in New England according to the Boston Herald.

He goes on to list many of the problems that would arise in Canada as well. They are not so united in philosophy either. But eastern Canada and western Canada value social justice as well as political and economic freedom and he could see hooking up eastern Canada with New England for starters. Why oh why would democracy have to flourish in the cold states?

I think that the article brings up some good points for discussion if you want to read it here. I am not a secessionist. More of my thoughts in the comments.

What Will the Neighbor's Think?

A ritzy-titsy antiques dealer in Manhattan is suing homeless people for $1 million dollars in damages "claiming that they are disrupting his business by using the sidewalk outside his high-end East Side store as a urinal, a spittoon and an occasional dressing room."
"...the suit also asks for a restraining order requiring them to stay at least 100 feet from the store. The suit notes that the antiques dealer is located “within the heart of New York’s most exclusive Madison Avenue shopping district,” with neighbors like Gucci, Chanel and Prada."
Oh for heaven's sake, their customers never look below their noses. And since when have homeless people sleeping on grates ever stopped someone in Manhattan from shopping?

Why Women Should Run the World

Because of people like Avril and Heather and the rest of the Limesuckers.

Heather is a lovely mid-30's woman who lives in NY. She makes her own pottery (which is for sale, of course) , works in a hospital and after over six months of having a doctor tell her she had GERD, she finally got one to listen to her and she found out she has cancer.

Now she is lucky enough to have medical benefits that will pay for the chemotherapy and the radiation therapy but NOT prescription coverage. Avril (bronxelf) just could not see the point in having Heather fight to beat her cancer only to lose everything to crushing debt. So, rather than whine and complain, she and her friends did something....they got naked.

Yep, they took of their clothes to make a calender available here, but they are going quickly, to raise money to help Heather pay for her medicine.

See that Washington, DC? No raising taxes, no complaining about what resources they have or don't have, no stealing the money from one place to use it in another; they banded together to protect, comfort and aid one of their own. Oh that our government would have half the sense and caring that these women do.

But that does seem to be the way of the world lately, doesn't it? Pelosi has managed to get more done in a week than the former Congress did in months. How? Not with more money but with more passion, with the understanding that it wasn't about 'her' it was about 'us', these are the sort of people we need to see more of. Anyone else have a link to some regular people doing some incredible things for others? I think we could all use a little ray of sunshine at the moment, don't you?

Wednesday, January 17

Girls gone wild on Long Island


Newsday: Three teenage girls [13 and 14] from North Babylon High School who videotaped themselves kicking and punching another girl and then posted the attack on the Internet were arrested yesterday by police who used the widely circulated video to help catch them, Suffolk police said.
These girls kicked the hell out of an 8th grader. Apparently they were very proud of it, because it was videotaped and appeared on YouTube, Photobucket and MySpace. I watched the video on the news. You can watch it here if you want. The victim told no one about it though.

The commentator on the news last night suggested that this was over a boy but that was not confirmed by Newsday. The attackers were talking about dropping Chinese food in the video. According to this mom, this is a new disturbing trend.
"It's disturbing," said one parent with a student at the high school, who declined to be named. She said it wasn't the first time students had posted a violent video online. In another case, a girl was stripped naked, she said. She said they call the fights "hopping people. "

"These kids go around doing this, on the regular," the mother said. "They're in the cameras, like they're celebrities. That's the most disturbing thing of all of this. "
And in another Newsday story Kids' new pastime: videos
Anthony Colleluori, a criminal defense attorney from Woodbury, said he has seen some cases where getting caught is part of the plan.

"There's some credibility to having been busted with your posse," he said.

Colleluori said some teens are even savvy enough to make money by selling footage of their violent videos.
It's very disturbing indeed, but not all that surprising when you consider what kids see grown ups do, such as the bush administration.

young people would describe McCain as an asslicker

and also another reason to absolutely never consider in my wildest dreams John McCain for president.

James Dobson, long noted for his intolerance, prejudice and hate speak all in the name of Jesus Christ said last week that he wouldn't support McCain's bid for president (as if this is a bad thing.) Yesterday, John McCain said that he wants to patch things up with Dobson. He also wants to establish dialogue with other christianistas such as Jerry Falwell.

A Kinder Gentler White House Correspondents Association Dinner

From Editor and Publisher: In an effort to appeal to the "Bob Novaks and bloggers of the world", Steve Scully, president of the White House Correspondents Association selected comedian Rich Little to entertain at this year's White House Correspondents Association dinner so as not to offend anyone after last year's "combative" performance by Stephen Colbert whom apparently some people just didn't get. Obviously the president didn't get it, because the WH didn't complain about Colbert's performance at all.

So they're bringing in the timely Rich Little, eh? He's still alive? Oh the politicians and journalists will just roll over laughing at his impersonations of Jimmy Durante, Johnny Carson, Richard Nixon and Kermit thee Frog. The hilarity ensues.

Love Is All You Need

Jon Stewart says he can end the war.
Watch him go all Barry White for Secretary of State, Dr. Condoleezza Rice as he describes his escalation and potential surge. Rrrrrowwww


Tuesday, January 16

Nice PR move Senator Dodd!

U.S. Senator Christopher Dodd Calls for Removal of Confederate Flag

Gotta start to get the name out there I suppose; but come on....

Is the Confederate Flag really still a national issue? Here we go again!

I suppose he has to start somewhere.

Hey (I)Joe -- (or now I kinda like "Joe (I)Conn") Are you gonna back Dodd?

Too Little Too Late

After Bush's speech this week, Americans are even more pessimistic about the war. Looks like 6 years of bushshit finally woke up the majority of the people. Despite the government spin on every single story in the media, more people than not began to read between the lines in recent years.

The funny thing is that Bush says the war's unacceptable too and that's why he is going to change it/make it even worse. He finds other things unacceptable and they are listed here. But unfortunately for him, it's all too little, too late.

But Who Is Going To Kill The Bugs?

51% of Women Are Now Living Without Spouse
According to the NYTimes, a new study confirms that for the first time ever, more women are living without a spouse than with one. Younger women are marrying later in life, older divorced and widowed women wait longer to remarry and only about 30% of black women live with a spouse. While most women will be married at some point in their lives, they will spend about half their adult lives unmarried. About 47% of men are living with a spouse.

Another popular article in the NY Times, Questions Couples Should Ask (Or Wish They Had) Before Marrying gives a clue to some of the issues that couples fail to ask. Things like: Do we like each other's families and friends? Is there anything one of us refuses to give up? What about children and careers? Who's going to maintain the house and the checkbook? Perhaps the divorce rate would be lower if couples knew the answers to these questions before they said, "I do." But I think perhaps couples already do know the answers to these questions and that's why less people are married. I think young people today are more realistic than people my age were, although we were more realistic than our parents.

Speaking as someone who has endured 30 years of marriage thanks to modern pharmaceuticals, I would have to say that even if we had answered and agreed with all the questions 30 years ago, we are not the same couple we were back then. We agreed on a lot of things at the time and one was to wait to have a family until we both saved up enough money to buy a house. But over time, some of us change and some stay the same. In some instances, both partners change. In our case, one of us was open minded enough to change with the times and entertain new ideas and trends while one of us has not changed one bit. The person who was once deemed awesomely cool is now deemed an old fogey. The person whose bohemian and eclectic behaviors that were once deemed charming are now viewed as annoying and flighty. We eventually disagreed on how to raise our son, but it worked out pretty well. Now we both have separate lives, separate interests, separate rooms, separate money, separate senses of humor and separate vacations. Our son will graduate from college this year and move on. The house is paid for. I am sick of living on the same island for more than 50 years. The mainland calls me. I like the west. He likes New England. A new future awaits us.

Maybe one of us should have taken the advice of the lady in this NY Times article, What Shamu Taught Me About a Happy Marriage and learned to train the spouse as one does an animal. I don't think so.

Tunic Tops and War Movies.... oh my!

Yep, those are the new year's FEATURED ITEMS at WalMart and Sams Club this here year of our Lord: 2007

(I had to venture out yesterday for milk, socks and underwear. I had NO CHOICE on where to go. You just can't beat the prices -- $2.09 for a gallon of milk!)

You know how when you enter wallyworld they have their best priced sale items to the left, on shelves at waist level, in front of the carriages? Well, they always have a display of CD's and video's at the end. I always stop because you can pick up some great music (usually) for under 4 dollars sometimes. I got Aretha's greatest hits last time for like 6 bucks! The videos are usually old cartoons or the three stooges-type classics.

NO MUSIC THIS YEAR -- HUGE DISPLAY OF CLASSIC WAR-type MOVIES. I couldn't believe it! Every item was a "collector's edition" 2 fur 1 pack of remakes! Here's a sampling:


Hang em High..(!) / The Good The Bad The Ugly
Torra Torra Torra / The Young Lions
Men of Honor / Mash
Battle of Britain / The Great Escape
The Alamo / Red River (John Wayne)
Platoon / Hart's War
Ox-Bow Incident / My Darling Clementine - -
(not sure how this Fonda 2-pack fits in here-- it was on the bottom)

Then I went to Sam's for milk and bread and OMG I bought a
TUNIC TOP similar to this one!!! I just loved the colors!!! I just HAD to take it home to try on. I felt like I was in a time warp. A HUGE RACK OF TUNIC TOPS in all sorts of vibrant, big, swirly colors was their FEATURE display item.
Anyone else seeing tunic tops on the racks? Have they always been there? Last year it was gaucho pants (I couldn't do it) but this year I just had to try the tunic. I felt like Cher when I tried it on! For a moment, I even felt like going back to WalMart to buy one of those war movies to watch...

and the beat goes on.

Well, I've snapped out of it and the tunic is going back (even though I STILL love the colors!) What a creepy feeling.

Ya know....I wish I could stand in front of that video display of war movies (maybe with the tunic on?) and hand out that
MUST READ LETTER that flame posted below. I wonder if they would let me?

I FEEL LIKE SHAKING PEOPLE RIGHT NOW

Excuse the rant here, but come on people!! I've got to do something! I feel like I am going mad!

Am I going mad?

I know it's only a tunic top and some classic war movies. I guess it doesn't take much for me to lose it lately.

Robot Chicken: George W. Bush, Jedi Knight!

lets try this again -
This might actually explain some of the unbelievable actions of W.

Monday, January 15

A Must Read Letter

And be sure to read the comments too. All over the world, people want the same basic things. Peace, Security and Freedom.... Brian Bloom, my hat is off to you. Well written and very timely.

Eeeewwwwwww

Did you read about further "undignified" hangings in Iraq over the weekend? Saddam's half brother's head fell off (no pictures at the link.) Can you imagine?

(sarcasm) When will the Iraqi government learn to kill someone with dignity? How can they expect to be viewed by the world as a civilized democratic nation when they can't do anything right- not even something as old as the time honored tradition of hanging someone. sheesh. (/sarcasm)

I Didn't Want to Watch 60 Minutes, But I Did.

I must have absolutely no willpower left whatsoever. Maybe it was the turkey dinner we ate during half-time.

We had just finished watching the football game on the telly when 60 minutes came on at 8:30 and I was not really in the mood to allow a buzzkill to spoil the victorious moment for New England, but what the hell. We watched Pretzeldent Bush on 60 Minutes before I turned off the box for the night.

One thing I have to say for the man- he's a very good misleader if you aren't all that up to date on everything that happened since the beginning of the war. If you are well informed, well then, the whole thing was laughable... in a sad way.

You can watch the video at CBS News here. Or read about it here.
Then discuss your reaction in the comments.

Meanwhile, back in Iraq: U.S. and Iraqis Are Wrangling Over War Plans
(use bugmenot.com to get a password for NYTimes.com if you don't have one)

In Memorium . . .

Martin Luther King, Jr., a great American, and a great leader of men and women.

He was dead by the time I turned ten. To this day, I cannot watch the video of the speech at the Lincoln Memorial without tears. Perhaps one day his dreams of equality for the people of color in this country will be realized.

When will we see the likes of Martin Luther King, Jr. again?

Sunday, January 14

Sunday-Go-To-Meeting Music

Open your Hymnals Blondes and let's all raise our voices with Marvin Gaye's classic, yet ever so sadly, still applicable What's Going On.

Petey, cue the Choir.


Mother, mother
There's too many of you crying
Brother, brother, brother
There's far to many of you dying
You know we've got find a way
To bring some luv'en here today

Father, father, father
We don't need to Escalate
You see, war is not the answer
For only love can conquer hate

You know we've got find a way
To bring some love'en here today

Picket lines and picket signs
Don't punish me with brutality
Talk to me, so you can see
What's going on
What's going on
Ah, what's going on

And in the meantime
Right on, baby
Right on
Right on

Father, father, everybody thinks we're wrong
Oh, but who are they judge us
Simply cuz our hair is long

Oh, you know we've got to find a way
To bring some understanding here today

You tell me what's going, I'll tell you what's going on....

Right on, baby
Our bank is overdrawn

Then open to page 32 and we'll sing "Takin' It To The Streets".

The Mystery Embassy

The $1billion US Embassy in Iraq should be completed this year.
Wow. That was fast. It may well be the only thing standing by the time bush is finished with Iraq.

BAGHDAD, Iraq - The fortress-like compound rising beside the Tigris River here will be the largest of its kind in the world, the size of Vatican City, with the population of a small town, its own defense force, self-contained power and water, and a precarious perch at the heart of Iraq’s turbulent future.
...
“The presence of a massive U.S. embassy — by far the largest in the world — co-located in the Green Zone with the Iraqi government is seen by Iraqis as an indication of who actually exercises power in their country,” the International Crisis Group, a European-based research group, said in one of its periodic reports on Iraq.

State Department spokesman Justin Higgins defended the size of the embassy, old and new, saying it’s indicative of the work facing the United States here.

“It’s somewhat self-evident that there’s going to be a fairly sizable commitment to Iraq by the U.S. government in all forms for several years,” he said in Washington.

Women Holds Her Wee for Wii

... and died from it.

Woman in water drinking contest dies

Can You Come?

This was originally posted on January 11.
From this blog, Red State Blues, Jersey Cynic and Blondesense are attending (feet willing.) Send an email to blondesense at optonline.net and we'll start a mailing list.

On Saturday, January 27th, the folks at United for Peace are staging a march on Washington in protest of the Iraq War and the so-called troop surge contemplated by Our Clueless Leader. United for Peace are the same folks who organized the last march on Washington in September 2005, which turned out to be moderately successful, with about 150,000-200,000 congregating, walking, singing and generally enjoying the opportunity to exercise their Constitutional rights. (That is, their Consitutional rights that still existed at that time. There may be even fewer now. )

Blonde Liz and BillyDoom came down for the last march and we had a great time, even though the CIA tried to kill us with some kind of rabbit disease (don't ask). We came back from the march with tired feet (I think we were asleep by 10 PM, swingers that we are) but energized by the knowledge that there were a LOT of people out there who feel the same way we do about this misguided and misbegotten war. We saw and met some cool people, yelled down some hecklers along the march route, and laughed a lot at the clever signs and posters that people came up with. Participants ranged from small babes in arms to Grannies for Peace, though we wondered where all the 30-somethings were (the crowd definitely was mainly the young, as in college aged and the, ahem, older crowd of 45+).

Anywho, if the unusually warm weather holds up, this march should be fun too. So let me extend an open invitation to my friends at BlondeSense who may be considering coming down: Please do. If I can't find room in my house for you, I can try friends who live in the neighborhood. They'll understand, because their mostly bong-smoking, hippie-luving, commie-coddling pinkos like me.

A Deluded and Compulsive Gambler

That was the headline in the Guardian Unlimited regarding Bush's 'new' Iraq plan. Actually many of the worlds papers say pretty much the same thing. Al Rai calls it 'Vietnam Redux' , the Malaysian Star also echoes the addicted gambler mindset.

Personally I can think of a simplier and more accurate description. Insane. Isn't there a saying that goes "Doing the same thing over and over again and somehow expecting a different result is the definition of insanity" - well I'd say this qualifies.

Let us put aside for a moment that "Mr. I-am -the-deciders-but
-you-Dems-need-to-come-up-with-a-plan-first" (although had he actually shown up for his duty in the National Guard, well you know, maybe he'd have a clue what to do now) has learned NOTHING from Vietnam (I'll cut him a small break, seeing as how he was strung out and coked up during most of those years) but he has learned NOTHING from the last five years.

He has show no empathy towards the sacrifice of our sons and daughters in the armed services, he has no compassion or understanding towards the families and lives that they left behind. He gives wounded soldiers that oh so vacant stare and arrogant smirk, he doesn't even bother to remember the names of the family members of the fallen (and its not like he agrees to meet with a whole lot of them, really, how hard is it to remember the woman's name? Don't call her 'Mom' - she's not your mother, her child is dead thanks to your effing stupidity)

To make matters even worse, W is now stating that he will do as he pleases, DESPITE what Congress says, (may I add that only Congress can declare a war, last time I checked they still had NOT done so). Despite the fact that 80+% of Americans disagree with what he has done and what he is now doing. But then again, why should we be surprised by that?

He is simply being what he has ALWAYS been. That snotty, spoiled rich kid frat boy who always had Daddy and Daddy's money to bail him out. I mean, damn, the man bankrupted a baseball team, let alone destroyed every business he was ever involved in. Did anyone REALLY expect him running the country to turn out well?

But at least now we have a fighting chance. The Rethuglicans are no longer in control of Congress. There is no longer any rubber stamp in effect. The new Congress has already passed several bills that W has stated he will veto. More and more Republicans are breaking rank and voting with Dems, listening to their constituents and hopefully being VERY mindful of the '08 elections.

Right now my best hope is that by overstepping the checks and balances of the Constitution; W will force a show down of impeachment and, dare I hope it, high treason proportions. Darth Cheney would be dragged down along with him (or perhaps they just won't shock him back to life this time around) Which would leave the most sane person in politics to pick up the reigns until the next election; Speaker Pelosi.

Un-freaking-believable

Guess what's been found in NYC, (again) this past week:

More biological debris from 9-11-01. 39 bones according to the last report.

The original nine-month cleanup yielded more than 20,000 pieces of remains of the nearly 3,000 victims of the terrorist attack. Since September 2005, more than 1,000 more have been found in a vacant skyscraper across from the site and in the service road on the western edge.

Although, also according to reports, city officials have every intention of NOW checking all manhole covers, streets and the destroyed church to see if there are any other remains flitting about.

Now, I do not mean to be crass nor do I want to open any wounds and rub salt into them, but HONESTLY, why is this taking so long? Over five years and still NUMEROUS bones and fragments are being found. Five years and still no decent memorial to those who lost their lives. Five years with no real closure for the country, let alone the citizens of New York City who lived through hell for months and had to stare into the cold, souless eyes of both apathy and terror. We can make all the analogies between the black pit at ground zero and the blackness in the hearts of the current administration but that is really not going to get us anywhere anymore. We know W and his freak show don't care; but dammit those victims had names, they had families, they deserve better. The people of NYC deserve better. We all need to demand more from our officials, at the bare minimum we deserve competence.

Blog for Choice

Just a heads up that January 22, the anniversary of Roe vs Wade, there will be a Blog for Choice going on again.

It’s that time of year again! (You know, when I bug you to blog about choice issues, duh.)
On January 22nd - the 34th anniversary of Roe v. Wade – NARAL is asking pro-choice bloggers to raise the profile of reproductive rights issues in the blogosphere and the media, and to let everyone know that a woman's right to choose is nonnegotiable.

So blog for choice on January 22nd, and this year's topic is a simple one: tell us, and your readers, why you're pro-choice.

You can sign up for Blog for Choice Day here and download a Blog for Choice Day sidebar graphic (to let your readers know that you're participating) here.

When you sign up to Blog for Choice, NARAL will send you a reminder, and link to your post on BushvChoice. (You can also tag your posts with "Blog for Choice" to show you're joining in.)

And of course, if you're not a blog or a website, please encourage (translation: bug) your favorite sites to take part in Blog for Choice Day!

I think its as good a time as any to get the ball rolling, considering some of the bills that are being debated in the State Houses. Let me bring you up to speed on a few of the more vile ones. South Dakota is at it again, asking for a re-trial regarding the constitutionality of their anti-choice law. Texas (big effing shock, I know) is copying SD's lead by pre-emptively putting a law into effect, should Roe v Wade every be overturned that would ONLY allow abortions in the case of immediate and fatal health risks to the mother. No exception for rape, incest or general health. But SD and Tx are mild compared to what the women hating asshates in Georgia have on their minds. Death... for the aborting incubator, oh excuse me - would be mother- and the doctor who performed the abortion. Yep, kill em all and let the imaginary sky-daddy sort it all out. I will link directly to this bill, just so you can see how much bullshit they made up, including a statement that reads as follows:

A fetus is a person for all purposes under the laws of this state from the moment of conception;

They further go on to state that abortion causes breast cancer, divorce, mental disease, smoking and suicide, and other unsavory things. Yep, bunch of brainiacs in Georgia, they might even beat out Louisiana and Alabama in the Darwin awards this time round.

Saturday, January 13

Enough to make me sick

Evading the real issue

There is no reason why a comment by Barbara Boxer needed to be a news story other than the fact that Condi was unable to answer Boxer's first question when she asked if there was an estimate as to how many casualties we can expect after this "surge."

Nevermind that Condi said that there was no way anyone could imagine what the cost in lives would be. No consideration was given to how many more American lives would be lost and the Rupert Murdoch media doesn't want anyone to contemplate that, so it was decided to make Condi look like the poor little victim.

Who is paying the price of the war?
Boxer asked Rice, who was defending Bush's new Iraq policy to the Senate, "Who pays the price?"

"I'm not going to pay a personal price," Boxer said. "My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young."

Then, Boxer said to Rice, "You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family."
Translation:
"Who is sacrificing for this war in Iraq? My family is too old and you don't have one."

Talk about projection

The reactions were stunning. The NY Post and Fox News, called Boxer's comments a "low blow" and a "slur." Tony Snow called it "tacky." No mention was made of the fact that Condi couldn't estimate how many of the troops might die, something that perhaps would be of concern to the families of the troops.

The NY Post tabloid opined that "Boxer "apparently believes that an accomplished, seasoned diplomat, a renowned scholar and an adviser to two presidents like Condoleezza Rice is not fully qualified to make policy at the highest levels of the American government because she is a single, childless woman.""

Uh. No. Laura Bush started that rumor.

Tony Snow: "Here you got a professional woman, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Barbara Boxer is sort of throwing little jabs because Condi doesn't have children, as if that means that she doesn't understand the concerns of parents."

The Spin Is Enough To Make You Vomit

Of course it's okay to be a woman who is single and childless. These are smart women. Where does anyone come off claiming that a California liberal woman would think otherwise? The ironic thing that came out of the broohaha between Condi and Barbara Boxer yesterday was that the very people (Bushistas) who publicly espouse the patriarchal ideology (that women should get married, bear children, be quiet and stay home where they belong) are the ones who are whining that feminism was set back... as if these people know anything about feminism other than to label it and put it in a box on a shelf.

Condi Spins It Too
"In an interview this afternoon with The New York Times, Ms. Rice suggested that the California Democrat had set back feminism by suggesting during the hearing that the childless Ms. Rice had paid no price in the Iraq war," Helene Cooper and Thom Shankar write.

"I thought it was okay to be single," Ms. Rice told the paper. "I thought it was okay to not have children, and I thought you could still make good decisions on behalf of the country if you were single and didn’t have children."
Ms Rice, who should have been addressed as Dr. Rice in the article, DIDN'T pay a personal price in the war on Iraq (unless she valued her reputation, which is long gone.) Neither did I, if you don't count my sanity. Unless my son or nephews got drafted, I won't know the personal anguish that the families of troops feel. I can only empathize.

Dear Dr. Rice,

I would like to comment on your ridiculous assertions following Senator Boxer's comments concerning those who are really sacrificing during the war.

Many single women have parents, siblings or nieces and nephews who are eligible to serve or are currently serving in the war on Iraq. No one was saying that single women are incapable of sacrificing their kin for your war on Iraq. Many single women do feel the pain of sacrificing a family member to your war. Perhaps you ought to re-read the transcript. If in fact if you do have kin who would be eligible to serve, why not mention it and this nonsense would be over with.

Laura Bush implied that you wouldn't make a good president because you have no husband or living family. Where was your outrage when she said that? Nowhere is it written that you need the aggravation of a spouse and family to make a good presidential candidate except in the Republican family values handbook. Other than the fact that you are not a good liar, you are certainly qualified to run for president.

You stated that Senator Boxer implied that you can't make a good decision on behalf of the country because you're childless. You must have been thinking of Laura Bush. Being a feminist myself, I would have picked up on Boxer's alleged slur. She said nothing of the sort. But since you bring it up out of the blue, Dr. Rice, in your case, the reason you are perceived as someone incapable of making a good decision on behalf of the country is because you constantly come across as a person who has no soul. You simply give the impression that you don't experience human emotions.

You made no effort to answer Senator Boxer's question honestly. She wanted you to know that there are people out there who do care what the dangers are of a "surge" in the war on Iraq. If you did indeed care about the sacrifice of families and troops, you would find out the answer. People are tired of your "I don't know" or "No one could imagine" replies to serious questions.

Does your outrage imply that you are sacrificing in some way for the troops sent into harms way? Did I miss something? I'd like to know what price you've paid for your war. It would be good for your image.

Sincerely
me

The Obama/McCain/Lieberman climate bill

All this, assessed purely as a response to global warming, amounts to pissing in the wind .....

and looks to me as if the 2008 presidential stage has been set.


Lieberman insisted their bill "solves the global warming problem without weakening the nation's economic position or imposing hardship on its citizens."

Their plan would rely heavily on the development of new technologies and market-based techniques to diminish the cost of emissions reductions, he said.

To keep costs in check, businesses could buy emissions "credits" from other companies that have exceeded their reduction targets and could use other methods to avoid the most costly cutbacks, according to a draft of the bill obtained Thursday by The Associated Press.

Friday, January 12

It's not nice to fool with mother nature.

China Facing Major Gender Imbalance

Obligatory Friday Sex Post

What excellent news! Now, you don't need to confine your porn viewing to the privacy of your own home. You can safely take it with you when you're on the road thanks to these cool new spectraspecs. (Okay, that's not what they're really called.) Why, the specs are even compatible with your X-Box or Playstation 3! So, you can watch porn on a plane and your seatmate will never be the wiser.

The only question I have is: how do you conceal the woody?

Support the Troops: Bring Them Home

I cannot comprehend how anyone can support the troops and simultaneously support bush's war. It's unconscionable to send them back over and over again for longer and longer tours of duty. The troops and their families are the only people in this country actually sacrificing for bush's folly and least likely to get anything out of it other than aggravation and sadness.

And it gets more surreal by the day...

FORT BENNING, Ga., Jan. 11 -- The pictures were just what the White House wanted: A teary-eyed President Bush presenting the Medal of Honor posthumously to a slain war hero in the East Room, then flying here to join the chow line with camouflage-clad soldiers as some of them prepare to return to Iraq.
[...]
To ensure that there would be no discordant notes here, Maj. Gen. Walter Wojdakowski, the base commander, prohibited the 300 soldiers who had lunch with the president from talking with reporters. If any of them harbored doubts about heading back to Iraq, many for the third time, they were kept silent.

"It's going to require sacrifice, and I appreciate the sacrifices our troops are willing to make," Bush told the troops. "Some units are going to have to deploy earlier than scheduled as a result of the decision I made. Some will remain deployed longer than originally anticipated."
After a while, certain soldiers were allowed to speak to reporters. The soldiers were not as enthusiastic and boisterous as they usually are when visited by their commander in chief.

Meanwhile,
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Pentagon has abandoned its limit on the time a citizen-soldier can be required to serve on active duty, officials said Thursday, a major change that reflects an Army stretched thin by longer-than-expected combat in Iraq.
[...]
Until now, the Pentagon's policy on the Guard or Reserve was that members' cumulative time on active duty for the Iraq or Afghan wars could not exceed 24 months. That cumulative limit is now lifted; the remaining limit is on the length of any single mobilization, which may not exceed 24 consecutive months, Pace said.

In other words, a citizen-soldier could be mobilized for a 24-month stretch in Iraq or Afghanistan, then demobilized and allowed to return to civilian life, only to be mobilized a second time for as much as an additional 24 months. In practice, Pace said, the Pentagon intends to limit all future mobilizations to 12 months. Read the rest of the article for more details. feh.

Thursday, January 11

Goodbye Green Acres


Reporting from his bully pulpit, The Escalator has told Congress to kiss his crippled ass and went ahead with his plan to bet farm. Goodbye, Green Acres......Iran here we come!

Open Thread: Changing the Course

breaking news below the post

He must have had more than a bong hit before the speech last night, because he delivered it without cracking up laughing.

He sort of admitted to mistakes but it also seems he promised to make lots and lots more of them in the coming months.

They weren't supposed to start sending more troops to the war on Iraq until my birthday, but it seems that the surge has already begun. Not only that, it appears that more troops than expected are being sent to the war on Iraq. The number last night was 21,500. If you have loved ones in the service, don't expect to have them home anytime soon. Bush said that he expects the casualties to increase as well. Interestingly, Tony Blair is pulling 3,000 troops out of Iraq.

Contrary to the suggestions from the Iraq Study Group, the decider has no intention of using any diplomacy whatsoever in dealing with Iran and Syria whom bush accused of aiding and abetting the insurgency. In fact he threatened them. “I recently ordered the deployment of an additional carrier strike group to the region.” This comment was not missed by the talking heads after the speech.

The decider still takes no blame for all the terrorists presently in Iraq nor takes the blame for not escalating the troops when it would have done some good.

Many GOPers had come out to say that they do not support the "surge" but Lieberman thinks it's a great plan and supports the pretzeldent. I think I know why but it's too controversial for me to express my opinion to the fullest in writing. You'll just have to guess. Furthermore, I believe that it's a good thing that this traitor is no longer a Democrat.

Attytood compares bush's speech to failed president Lyndon B Johnson's speech exactly 4o years ago to the day. Yes, you may hum the theme to the Twilight Zone as you read it.

And just to add icing to the "1984 cake," Roger Ailes (Faux News) will receive the 2006 First Amendment Leadership Award.
------------


Breaking news across the globe but not in the US media as of 2:00PM EST:
Iran reacted strongly Thursday to a U.S. military raid on its consulate in northern Iraq, demanding that the Iraqi government intervene to secure the release of consulate officials arrested during the incident. read the rest

And the Kurds in Iraq are not happy about this:
The Presidency and the Kurdistan Regional Government express their dismay and condemnation of the American action against the official consulate of the Islamic Republic of Iran... read the rest


Wednesday, January 10

UH-OH! I've been tagged.

With a meme. By The Fat Lady Sings. So, I have to provide 5 truths and 1 falsehood about my existence and let the readership determine to the best of its ability, which is the lie.

Here goes:

1) I was born in Los Angeles on the same day as The Battle of Los Angeles: "Have you ever heard of the Battle of Los Angeles? Few have. Imagine a visiting spacecraft from another world, or dimension, hovering over a panicked and blacked-out LA in the middle of the night just weeks after Pearl Harbor at the height of WWII fear and paranoia. Imagine how this huge ship, assumed to be some unknown Japanese aircraft, was then attacked as it hung, nearly stationary, over Culver City and Santa Monica by dozens of Army anti-aircraft batteries firing nearly 2,000 rounds of 12 pound, high explosive shells in full view of hundreds of thousands of residents. Imagine all of that and you have an idea of what was the Battle of Los Angeles."

2) I have attended 7 colleges and universities and never received a degree.

3) I sang on the stage of the Lyric Opera of Chicago during the 1965-66 season.

4) Beginning in 1966, I built my own home in northeast Illinois, helped build a flat-rolling steel mill in the middle of a cornfield about 12 miles away from my home, built bridges on an interstate highway spur down to the front door of the steel mill, and then went to work in the office of the steel mill where I remained for 17 years.

5) Early in my acting career, I was good friends with Carrie Snodgress, who was nominated for an Academy Award for "Diary of a Mad Housewife", and also Linda Hunt, who won an Academy Award for "The Year of Living Dangerously".

6) The internet e-mail system enabled me to reestablish contact with an old friend whom I thought had drifted into history, all the while owing me $50 which I had lent him back in 1964. At no urging from me, just this past year he sent me a check for $100. This same friend is the writer-producer-director of "And In The End The Death and Life of John Lennon", which opened in Australia last year.

House Approves Boost to Minimum Wage

House members voted 315 to 116 to raise the federal wage floor by $2.10 over two years.
Check out this news at Raw Story.

I don't get it. One groups says it will hurt small businesses, others say it will not. One group thinks that hardly anyone supports a family on minimum wage, another groups says that many do try to support families on minimum wages. So what exactly is the truth? Someone is lying in their teeth.

Open blogwhoring

Updating the blogroll this week
Are there any of you regular readers who have a blog and not on our blogroll? You should be.
Post your links in the comments (and yes it would be nice if you linked back, but it's not required.)

To my co-bloggers, would you like Blondesense to link to some of your favorite haunts that are not on the blogroll? Post them in the comments.

That's it. Carry on.

What You Won't Hear

A small list of things you can bet the farm on won't be rolling off the Decider's forked tongue tonight.

"We're gonna roll out diplomatic initiatives."

"The time has come to set down and have a serious talk with Iraq's neighbors."

"We're gonna attempt negotiations with the militia and insurgent groups."

"The US will assure, no wait, promise Iraq that it will not maintain permanent bases in Iraq."

"Let us make it perfectly clear. The US does not intend to control the Iraqi Oil."

"We will have all of our troops withdrawn from Iraq by.............. Or I'll resign."

"Let me first acknowledge the massive death and suffering caused by this totally unnecessary war."

"I accept full responsibility for the hell hole in Iraq and will personally make restitution with my family fortune."

"Vice President Dick Cheney is on board with the restitution thing too."

"As much as we wanted Democracy for Iraq and have given them the opportunity to grab the reins, we now realize that the war there is not helping reduce the chance of Terra attacks on the US."

"Sending more money and troops to Iraq will only lead to the slaughter of more of our servicemen and women and Iraq citizens"

"After this address tonight I'm checking into rehab."

"If nothing else, I think I taught America to be more particular the next time they vote."

New Congress' New Bill Faces Scrutiny

Vill zee new bill protect zee homeland?

The new congress passed their first bill, a security bill, yesterday which most likely will be stalled in the senate. There are concerns that requiring cargo inspections would be too costly and unfeasible.
The measure would provide better communications equipment for emergency workers, more money for high-risk areas, strengthen the sharing of U.S. intelligence information with local authorities and seek to reduce radicalism with efforts overseas to promote development and education.

The House also approved a resolution to create an intelligence oversight panel, in line with the commission's call for greater congressional oversight.
On this morning's cover of Newsday, there is Bloomberg, NYC Mayor, complaining to legislators that NYC is the greatest terrorist target and that anti-terrorism funding is "spread across the country like peanut butter." Indeed.
"One town spent some of its share on a custom-built trailer for its October mushroom festival," Bloomberg told the Senate Homeland Security Committee in its first hearing under Democratic control. "Al-Qaida must be laughing all the way to their tents. Meanwhile New York City -- which has enormous needs, which has been attacked before, has been targeted many times since and will most likely be targeted again -- goes wanting."
The bill does however give more money to NYC and Long Island this time. As you may recall, NYC was shunned the last time homeland security doled out money to various country fairs across the nation and little to NY claiming that NYC had no monuments.

No offense to Minnesota, and I love Minnesotans, but Norm Coleman needs a reality check:
"There are a lot of areas of great risk, you know, throughout the heartland," said Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.). "In Minnesota, we have the Mall of America. ... Minnesota Wild [hockey team] play at the Xcel Energy Center, a symbol of America."
Snicker.

Joe Lieberman, trying to be friends with both sides suggested that rather than talking about how to divide the pot, ought to argue about the size of the pot. The 9/11 Commission did not suggest that every single state get anti-terrorist funding however.

One of the problems that plagued the overcrowded and dense NYC on 9/11 was the communication problem between rescue workers. Congress aimed to fix that, BUT
Bloomberg also asked Congress to scrap rules that bar the city from reimbursement for a new wireless emergency communications system because it does not operate on specified frequencies.

"This restriction punishes us for our aggressiveness in protecting our city," he said. " ... We're building it on a frequency that works best in the subways, skyscrapers and density of our urban environment. For Congress to move forward on their plan without making sure New York City is part of it is just the height of foolishness."
Yeah, really. Come on.

Are You Gonna Watch?

King George gives his address to the nation tonight, to explain to the American public how he is going to perpetuate the worst foreign policy disaster in the nation's 230 year history. It will be carried live by all the major networks and the so-called news channels.

I can't watch the man on the teevee; it makes me physically ill. The smirk, the mispronunciations, the mangled syntax, the idiotic facial expressions, the eye blinkings, the robotic arm gestures. Certainly the substance of the speech, with what I expect will be tortured rationales for the proposed troop surge, is sure to elevate my blood pressure and leave me screaming at the teevee, causing my teenager to question momma's sanity.

So, nope, not gonna do it. I think there's a new episode of Top Chef on Bravo calling my name.

Are you gonna watch?

TAKE ACTION -- NO MORE TROOPS TO IRAQ -- A NATIONWIDE SURGE OF PROTEST

Hit the Streets tomorrow -- 1/11

I hope there is a location near you. Please pass this on.

America Says NO more troops!
Thursday, Jan. 11th
A Nationwide Surge of Protest
Of The US Military Occupation of Iraq
President Bush is expected to reveal his "new strategy” for Iraq on Wednesday January 10th. Defying the mandate of Americans who voted in November to end the madness and begin to bring our troops home, he will call for an escalation in the number of US combat troops in Iraq.

Let's deliver an immediate and direct response to the president’s call for escalation: NO!

Volunteers will host actions in cities and towns across the country within 24 hours of the president’s speech with a simple message: "America says NO more troops in Iraq!”

Search for an America Says NO! event in your area.

click here

Also, Foiled Girl over at BBB has posted Senator Kennedy's Address to the National Press Club yesterday.

Please take his words with you.

Tuesday, January 9

OH! The Humanity!

The oceanfront home of "Three's Company" star Suzanne Somers was destroyed in a fast-moving fire that also gutted three other houses in the exclusive seaside community, the actress said on Tuesday.

Fed up




In other news, the NY Times reports that middle income earners saw their federal tax rates rise while the top 1% of earners saw their tax rates drop. The rich paid a larger share of total taxes however but that's because their incomes are rising so rapidly thus widening the gap between the rich and poor.


When asked about raising the tax rate for the very wealthy in order to pay for the war in Iraq's jobs program on Bloomberg News, John McCain answered, “I’m not sure what the point would be,” adding, “I’m not sure I would want to raise their taxes just because we’re in a war.”

Monday, January 8

Cure For Yellow Ribbon Patriotism

(Yellow Ribbon Patriot: One of them that drives around thinking they're supporting our troops and the war effort by having a magnetic sticker on their vehicle with a patriotic slogan.)

by Robert Weitzel

"A man I once knew survived his tour of duty in Vietnam. In the privacy of a rented house trailer he drank alone until he finally had the “courage” to kill himself. I don’t know if he saw combat. He never said. I only assumed he had because when he spoke, what he said had the finality of a trigger pull. To my mind, there is only one way to acquire such certainty.

"I only saw him on the weekends when he made beer runs for my high school buddies and me. We gave him a six-pack and ten minutes of our time for his trouble and then left him as we had found him, sitting at his kitchen table pulling on an unfiltered cigarette and sipping a lukewarm beer like he had all the time in the world.

"I didn’t see him after high school and he was dead by the time I next thought to ask about him. I don’t know that he was a casualty of the war. He might have traveled the same road regardless of Vietnam. But then, he might not have.

"Like most returning Vietnam vets before the release of the POW’s, he was not given a hero’s welcome. Hero was a term we seldom used back then; not like today when we toss it out like confetti on the deserving and the undeserving alike.

"He came back instead to an indifferent, if not hostile, country. He and his fellow vets were slipped into the country singly or in small groups so as to diffuse throughout the population the “cure” they carried in their marrow, rendering it as ineffectual as a homeopathic dilution.

"The “cure” these soldiers brought back from Vietnam was a potion distilled of moments: moments of bravery and sacrifice and sorrow, of bowel-loosening fear, of dehumanizing anger and hostility, of unasked and unanswered questions, moments too damaging to the soul to ever find release in confession.

"It was a potion that if used thoughtfully could inoculate the nation against the disease of the god Mars. But it was ignored along with the soldiers. Vietnam vets, like the man I knew, were left to overdose on the potion in their own private hell."

There's more, well worth your while to read. The rest is at Common Dreams.

(Editor's Note: This is not MY post, in spite of what it says at the bottom; it was sent to me to post by the only woman I've ever really loved. -- PoLT)

America Re-Invades African Country

U.S. Strike in Somalia Targets Al-Qaeda Figure

"The strike in southern Somalia was launched at night from the U.S. Central Command base in neighboring Djibouti. It was based on joint military-CIA intelligence and on information provided by Ethiopian and Kenyan military forces operating in the area."

Article in the Washington Post.

Is this another war we're going to lose? Does Somalia grow a lot of opium? Just askin'.

"Bush Senior Early CIA Ties Revealed"

From The Real News Project:

"Newly released internal CIA documents assert that former president George Herbert Walker Bush's oil company emerged from a 1950's collaboration with a covert CIA officer.

"Bush has long denied allegations that he had connections to the intelligence community prior to 1976, when he became Central Intelligence Agency director under President Gerald Ford. At the time, he described his appointment as a 'real shocker.'

"But the freshly uncovered memos contend that Bush maintained a close personal and business relationship for decades with a CIA staff employee who, according to those CIA documents, was instrumental in the establishment of Bush's oil venture, Zapata, in the early 1950s, and who would later accompany Bush to Vietnam as a “cleared and witting commercial asset” of the agency.

"According to a CIA internal memo dated November 29, 1975, Bush's original oil company, Zapata Petroleum, began in 1953 through joint efforts with Thomas J. Devine, a CIA staffer who had resigned his agency position that same year to go into private business."

More at the link.

Considering this nation is obsessed with "celebrity"...


This painting of Angelina Jolie as the Blessed Mother hovering over a Walmart checkout line is truly inspired. It is titled, "Blessed Art Thou" and was painted by Kate Kretz who happens to have a blog.

Does celebrity worship have anything to do with class? The artist explores this possibility. The artist also explores why, if the bible celebrates the meek as blessed, this obsession with the rich and famous?

Heck if I know why... except that there are wannabees in the world and "celebrity" is marketed especially for them. I'm not sure that it's a class issue as much as a self esteem issue, but then again, I could be wrong, as usual. I think this piece opens up a dialogue about something that none of us can avoid.

hat tip to lalock

Idaho. Texas. Maine. -- We're Surrounded.

New York Times Blog:
In Austin, authorities cleared a full 10 blocks of the downtown business district early this morning after “dozens of birds were found dead in the streets,”

Idaho Statesman:
"1,000 dead mallards puzzle Idaho vets"

FluTrackers.com:
"Dozens of dead crows have been found near a shopping center in Lewiston(Maine), and nobody seems to know why they're dying."

UPDATE: Sorry to bore you folks further but there's this:
THOUSANDS of birds have fallen from the skies over Esperance (Australia) and no one knows why.

WANTED

67 members of the Senate to vote to remove George W. Bush from office. Where is Larry Flynt's Big Fish list when you need it?

Maybe like the gentleman in the photo we could get two for the price of one and remove Dick too!

Power Surge

Bush dumped General George Casey because he didn't tell bush what bush wanted to hear. Casey was talking about the withdrawal of the troops. Bush says he wants "victory" although he has never defined "victory". I suspect that victory is a code word for prolonged profitable war.

In yesterday's NY Times, I read
BAGHDAD, Jan. 7 — The new American operational commander [Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno] in Iraq said Sunday that even with the additional American troops likely to be deployed in Baghdad under President Bush’s new war strategy it might take another “two or three years” for American and Iraqi forces to gain the upper hand in the war.
The story goes on to explain Odierno's plan for securing Baghdad vs. the way it was attempted previously. I don't know anything about war... so whatever. It sounds stupid to me though.

Over at antiwar.com, there is a disturbing story about those troops being sacrificed for bush's victory.
"...soldiers who survive attacks are often severely disabled for life.

Dr. Imbascini just returned from a four-month deployment to Germany, where he treated the worst of the U.S. war wounded. He said that an extremely high number of wounded soldiers are coming home with their arms or legs amputated. Imbascini said he amputated the genitals of one or two men every day.

"I walk into the operating room and the general surgeons are doing their work and there is the body of this Navy SEAL, which is a physical specimen to behold," he told IPS. "And his abdomen is open, they're exploring both intestines. He's missing both legs below the knee, one arm is blown off, he's got incisions on his thighs to relieve the pressure on the parts of the legs that are hopefully gonna survive and there's genital injuries, and you just want to cry."
In order for bush to have to prove that the 3000+ deaths and 150,000 devastating injuries were 'worth it,' just how many more deaths and injuries will occur and how exactly will anyone know when enough is enough?

Does "supporting our troops" mean that you have to support the war on Iraq until it is somehow proven that the war was worth it? Or does supporting our troops mean that you won't rest until stir people up enough to force the president to quit dreaming and get our troops out of a nightmarish situation?

If we "win" someday, will anyone be able to tell if it was worth it? Will the families of the fallen and the dismembered be able to sleep easier? I wonder.

-----
meanwhile
from AlJazeera:
Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, has said his country may "review" relations with countries which have criticised the manner of the execution of Saddam Hussein, saying the hanging was an internal matter.

Al-Maliki said: "We consider the execution of the dictator an internal affair that concerns only the Iraqi people."
Uh oh. The US was critical of the lynching, I mean, hanging. Will we be ordered out of there?

And the US is anxiously awaiting bubble boy's new Iraq war plan while Pelosi is warning him to be ready to justify every cent he expects to spend. Let's just see if her bite is as bad as her bark.

Sunday, January 7

True?

Have you heard the rumors that Negroponte will fill Condi's boots and that Condi will fill Cheney's huntin' boots? oy.

Did you read in this morning's news that Israel was planning to nuke Iran? Now they are denying it. But the US is going to build a brand new nuclear warhead.

The Independent claims that a new law in Iraq will allow western oil companies to reap up to 75% of Iraqi oil profits until they are back on their feet and the oil companies are repaid. After that, they'll only reap 20% of Iraq's oil profits. If that's true, then we were all right about this war from the get go.

Question. Does bush know what "surge" means?

Free Stuff? Or Does Everything Come At a Price?

My friend Kellyrae call me last week, crying so hard I could barely make out what she was saying. A death in the family? Sickness? An accident? Had she lost her job?

When she finally calmed down enough to speck, I realized she was talking about her husband.

"I.........had.........every.......week.........and......he.........just .........threw them away!"

Kellyrae didn't need to say another word. I realized her husband had tossed out the loyal-shopper frequent buyer coupons you get at our local grocery store.

See, if you shop ten out of twelve weeks and spend at least forty dollars, you can get free stuff. Good stuff like turkeys and towels and gas and even cash.

We have all become a little obsessed with this give away coupon thing. Here was a woman who is getting her Ph.D in Russian studies and she is sobbing hysterically because her husband trashed eight weeks' worth of gobble dollars.

I felt her pain. Hadn't I choked on the Thanksgiving Giveaway last year? Sure, I had ten coupons, but they included three weeks sixes, a rookie mistake.

Listen to me, I don't care if you only have a jar of garlic olives in the refrigerator and the kids haven't had cereal since last Saturday, you don't go to the grocery store until the next coupon week starts----always on Wednesday.

Last Monday, Long Suffering began to whine about the lack of diet soda in the house.

"Are you insane?" I shrieked. "We can't have soda again until week seven. Do you have any idea how close we are to free gas?"

"But I'm really thirsty," he started. "Then try this!" I said, wrenching the cold water faucet on. "It's called water! Get used to it!"

Those of us who are good at this coupon thing have little patience for those who aren't, or the people who tell the cashier rather high-handedly, "Oh I'm not collecting those things."

Hmmph. Guess their cars run on snob juice.

We don't go to spinning classes, get seaweed wraps and such'. We wear our badge of "penny pinching' proudly.

At a Saturday night gettogethers you will more than likely find us outside frying a turkey with a can of Aqua Net.

We aren't ashamed to have dirt from the garden embedded in the prongs of our 3-carat diamond engagement rings and we'll slam on a brakes to point out a magnificent dogwood or mourn evidence of blight.

A Yankee friend of mine once remarked how odd it was that women here mow their own grass.

Well, of course we do.

We are precious and dahlin' in our straw mowing hats and don't you forget it, sugah.

Dear Diary,

If it wasn't for the low angle of the sun, you'd swear it was April in NY yesterday. There was a record high of 72º. Flowers are blooming. Grass is green. Nice. My son called from southern Arizona and reported that it was only 56º. Nyah. We're going surfing today at Jones Beach.

I dined with our dearest and oldest friends, the "Muffies and Buffies" in Bush's base last evening. It's my old home town- rich, white, conservative stockbrokers and bankers who benefit greatly from the tax cuts and their lovely wives who drive tremendous SUVs to pick up the children from the finest public schools that tax money can buy; people who describe outfits as "simply darling" through their mouths that barely move when they speak. You have to keep your teeth clenched when you ask, "What do you think of the market, Tad?" I believe it's called "lockjaw" by outsiders.

Some of our old friends still live there in gorgeous homes they inherited. It's the only town where the local Catholic church is WASPY. It's a very lovely village to visit but I wouldn't want to live there. Not again. But then again, the folks there would benefit from my outspokenness more often. ha.

My custom made wine charms were a hit as my hostess gift.
"Muffy, did you see these wine charms Lizbeth made? They are so amusing."

Unfortunately for me, the new trend in crystal lushware are stem-less wine goblets. Silly me. So out of touch with reality, I am. I was soooo looking forward to being "cheap date" (not pictured here.)


It's so interesting to mingle with people who voted for bush after the damage has been done. They admit that they weren't paying enough attention at the time and they were hoodwinked by Faux News. They really do try to look at the bright side of things, as do I, but we really couldn't come up with much brightness. We decided that our troops handing out candy to grieving children is a lovely thing to do, but really doesn't constitute good news, per se. And what good is reconstruction if the insurgents blow it up?

So, the war is not popular in Yuppyville, NY, nor is the possible escalation. The men in attendance proceeded to describe how they got out of Vietnam by partying in attending college for years and years and years. We laughed, we cried, we missed the good old Nixonian years and then we listened to a Manfred Mann retrospective on full blast.

Saturday, January 6

Obligatory Friday Sex Post

A day late.

So I was reading the sex news and it seems that Paris Hilton has decided not to go ahead with having a sex doll made of herself that would sell for about $50,000. The idea "freaked her out," as it should.
"Hilton hated the thought of strangers making love to a doll that looked exactly like her, even though the venture would have made her a fortune."

So for all of you freaks who are let down over this news, here's a Paris Hilton sex doll I have designed that you can make for yourself. Throw a blonde party wig on a pool noodle and voila!

What if?

I read this audio book description on Amazon:
Conservatize Me: How I Tried to Become a Righty
with the Help of Richard Nixon, Ann Coulter, Toby Keith, and Beef Jerky
by John Moe
What would happen to a liberal's mind if he subsisted entirely on conservative media and rhetoric? That's what critically acclaimed political humorist, NPR commentator, and McSweeney's contributor John Moe sets out to learn in Conservatize Me.

We always hear how everyone in America is firmly planted in red or blue. They're permanently conservative or irreversibly liberal. But are we all really that locked into the left or the right?

John Moe, raised in a family of proud left-wingers and living in deeply liberal Seattle most of his life, sets out to determine if what we believe is based on environment or actual conviction. Moe puts himself on a strict conservative regimen: He resets his radio dials from NPR to Rush Limbaugh, goes head-to-head with some of today's most influential conservative thinkers for a series of "conversion sessions," and through it all tries to maintain positive standing with his lefty wife and young but already liberal kids.
Could you do something like this? And how would you go about it? Do you think that your convictions come from your environment, your family, your geographical location? Were you just born with them?

I just cannot abide conservative media. Besides it making my head explode, it makes me physically ill.

I think I was born with my convictions but had some instances in my life where they wavered a bit, but I never swung to the dark side completely. Environment played some part in some shaky parts of my life. Lord knows that nothing but private schools, belonging to an all white country club, having a banker daddy, hired help around the house, a summer house in the Hamptons and all that sort of stuff exposed me to some real life conservatives, but the lifestyle of the wealthy Republican capitalists in my family's circle didn't really interest me. They weren't the mean kind of conservatives you see on the television today. They were just oblivious and dismissive of contrary views. Sounds like Bush's base. Being artistic throughout my life, I was deemed "eclectic" -then dismissed. The hypocrisy was outstanding. I could write a book. "Muffy is it 5 o'clock yet? Make mine very dry. Have you seen the children lately? I said very dry."

"You go to war with the Army you've got"

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Army said Friday it would apologize to the families of about 275 officers killed or wounded in action who were mistakenly sent letters urging them to return to active duty.

The letters were sent a few days after Christmas to more than 5,100 Army officers who had recently left the service. Included were letters to about 75 officers killed in action and about 200 wounded in action.
ouch.

And talk about too much time in the battle fields:
WASHINGTON - A Marine squad that had just endured casualties from a roadside bombing ordered five unarmed Iraqi civilians out of a taxi, and the squad leader shot them...

...naval investigators found that the defenseless Iraqis were then shot one by one by Wuterich as they stood next to the vehicle and about 10 feet from Wuterich.

Another Marine allegedly fired shots into the victims' bodies as they lay on the ground.
You wonder how you would act if you were faced with bombs daily. You wonder just how screwed up these young people are going to be, should they survive, when they return to their families.

I just spoke with a young reservist who is lucky enough to have been sent home for 10 days, but not lucky enough to get to stay home because he is still alive and/or hasn't lost any limbs. He describes having to be alert every minute of the day there or you'll lose your life. He kind of jokes about it. I kind of don't blame him. It must be very hard to endure without a flippant sense of humor.

Eclectics Anonymous reports that with ingenious rewording of the Pentagon’s fiscal year 2007 budget legislation, private contractors can now be tried just like soldiers if they do anything illegal. There are about 100,000 private contractors working in Iraq that were previously unchecked. Is this good news? I guess so.

Friday, January 5

dishing the dirt: psychedelic justice



The FBI released documents this week that revealed details of the psychedelic justice. Not only was U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist a druggie in his first decade on the supreme court, he suffered from paranoid delusions and heard voices during the start of his second decade when he was in drug withdrawal. Supposedly when interviewed by the FBI, his doctors said that his problem wouldn't interfere with his serving on the court. Of course not. And we hippies were worried that our past would hurt our chances in public service.

It seems that during Rehnquist's confirmation battles, the REPUBLICANS, who else, enlisted the FBI to interrogate interview witnesses set up by Senate Democrats. Nixon particularly wanted criminal investigations done on witnesses who might show that Rehnquist was a racist. The plan to use the FBI to interrogate interview Democratic witnesses was first conceived by the Nixon administration in 1971 and then 15 years later the Reaganistas did the same thing when he was to be elevated to chief justice.

EAT ALREADY!



Ever wonder why the subway gets stuck in the station for so long? What exactly happened that the train isn't moving. What did those incompetent schmucks do now? What broke? Did someone fall under the train? Did someone get stabbed?

Nope.

MTA: The number one cause of transit delays: sick passengers.

The number one sick passenger ailment: fainting dieters.

Thursday, January 4

American History


The first female speaker of the house and her grandchildren celebrate the momentous day that they may one day read about in their history books.


Keith Ellison, the country's first Muslim congressman, whose African American family has been in this country since 1742 and was raised Catholic, places his hand on Thomas Jefferson's Koran.

Atheists challenge the religious right

Atheists challenge the religious right
A mere 96 pages, "Letter" may be dismissed by many for its condescending tone or overheated rhetoric. Yet its bold arguments offer a useful window into nontheist perspectives and could also startle some complacent religionists into a rethinking and refining of perceptions.

Many nontheists don't share this militant perspective, but have decided that keeping silent in religious America no longer makes sense. They are astonished that a majority of Americans question evolution and support teaching intelligent design in the science classroom. They are distressed over polls that show that at least half of Americans are unwilling to vote for an atheist despite the Constitution's requirement that there be no religious test for public office. And they contend that in recent years, Congress has passed bills and the president has issued executive orders that have privileged religion in inappropriate and unconstitutional ways.

As a result, seven organizations of nontheists - including atheists, freethinkers, humanists, and agnostics - began the Secular Coalition for America (SCA), a lobby seeking to increase the visibility and respectability of nontheistic viewpoints in the United States.


See also The Rational Response Squad website mentioned in the article.

Mind Blowing

From Think Progress

You bastards:
“President Bush has quietly claimed sweeping new powers to open Americans’ mail without a judge’s warrant,” the New York Daily News reports. “The President asserted his new authority when he signed a postal reform bill into law on Dec. 20. Bush then issued a ’signing statement’ that declared his right to open people’s mail under emergency conditions.”

Neoconservatives “have found themselves under attack in Washington policy salons and, more important, within the Bush administration,” over the Iraq war. But now, “a small but increasingly influential group of neocons are again helping steer Iraq policy.” Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) will press for escalation at an event tomorrow at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute.

Energy giant ExxonMobil borrowed tactics from the tobacco industry to “manufacture uncertainty” about climate change, spending $16 million on groups that question global warming, the Union of Concerned Scientists documents in a new report.

Go Nancy! Go America!



Now if I can find my American flag which has been relegated to one of the shelves in the garage for lo these past 6 years, I am going to fly it today. I wish I had one with tits on it.

Jubilant Democrats prepared to elect Rep. Nancy Pelosi as the (Queen) first woman to run the House of Representatives as the party takes control of both chambers of Congress for the first time in 12 years. AP

Talk about a flip flopper



Why John McCain would be labeled a 'maverick' beats the heck out of me. Even when he does somewhat oppose something from bush, he eventually comes around and pleases the chimperor. So it was pretty good news to read this: John McCain a target for all sides
good.

President Death

Since Jack Ruby shot a handcuffed Lee Harvey Oswald dead on live television, we have seen a considerable number of murders on television, both real and imagined.
The most recent one, the execution of Saddam Hussein, has had some unintended consequences--the death of two young boys evidently working out the horror they saw on television by experimenting.

They hanged themselves.

The boys, one in Webster, Texas and another in Pakistan saw the broadcast images and thought they would try to understand it they way kids do--through re-enactment and play.

Network television acted irresponsibly by telecasting the execution. It is ridiculous that the outrage over Janet Jackson's bare breast received more coverage. Surely television station's switchboards lit-up with calls complaining about the images of the execution?

We are witnesses to the frontier justice of Saddam's lynching and it was a lynching, as American officials handed Saddam over to his executioners in time for an imagined deadline. It wasn't the rule of law. It wasn't even much of a trial or an appeal. How do you have a trial when your defense attorney's keep getting murdered?

We barely hold on to democracy here--the president is sending more troops and to hell with what American's want. The president rewrites laws as he signs the congressional version into law. Whose law? His version or the Congress'?

If the rule of law means anything to Congress, they will impeach Bush.

Saddam's "execution" looked like a lynching. The thugs who held and taunted him did not appear to be "officials" if such exist in Iraq. The hanging was not held in public, but in Saddam's former torture chamber. His victims were murdered years ago and he was tried only for that offense yet we are repeatedly told or perhaps sold on the legitimacy of this execution and indeed this war because Saddam murdered thousands. Why didn't he stand trial for all his crimes?

It is interesting that President Bush who once mocked the pleas for mercy by Texas death row inmate Karla Faye Tucker simply walked away from questions regarding Saddam's execution. Bush hadn't seen the cell phone video of the execution. He rode Tucker's dead body into the White House. When the hanging was happening, Bush and Laura and the dogs were in an armored vehicle in Central Texas during a tornado warning. That is indeed about as far away from the scene of the crime as the former death warrant signer/decider can get. The governor who supervised more executions in Texas--by "supervising" you mean he was in Austin while the convicted were strapped down to a gurney in Huntsville--didn't strut and thump his chest about Saddam. Did we see those images over and over again to justify the death of 3000 of our children?

What is wrong, Mr. Bush? Don't you like your brown eyed boy, Mister Death?

Wednesday, January 3

Olbermann on Sacrifice

Did you happen to catch Keith Olbermann, the only man I ever really loved (sorry Missouri Mule) last night? He exercised his first amendment right brilliantly without calling for violence against the decider. Video and transcript at C&L

----------
This story will surely cause a shitstorm:
Keith Ellison will take his oath of office on Thomas Jefferson's Koran. I have no comment.
Grab some popcorn.

Have you read the latest propaganda

The decider wrote an op ed in the WSJ.

As many of you know, those who write op-eds in the WSJ do not actually read the news that is reported in the rest of the paper.

The deluded one writes about the new congress:
Together, we have a chance to serve the American people by solving the complex problems that many don't expect us to tackle, let alone solve, in the partisan environment of today's Washington. To do that, however, we can't play politics as usual. Democrats will control the House and Senate, and therefore we share the responsibility for what we achieve.
Sure. Now that the Democrats have the power, he doesn't want them to play the same politics that the Republicans played when they were in power. And what "partisan" environment is he talking about? It was a Republican environment all the way. Feh.

Execution Schmexecution

My eyeballs hurt today from rolling them so much while listening to the talking heads on the news express their outrage that Saddam didn't go with "dignity" because he was "taunted" by the "biased" executioners. The executioners obviously didn't like him and wanted him dead. What more can you expect? And god forbid, his hanging made it to YouTube.com. What the hell did anyone expect in this day and age?

"Where are you supposed to find compassionate yet competent executioners these days," she huffed at the pundit yapping on the big box in the living room. "Why don't you just sign up to be an executioner and show us how it's supposed to be done?"

Maybe it was Billydoom's birthday champagne gone to my head, but we came up with a suggestion after watching the "undignified" hanging of Saddam Hussain on the news last night- Let the prosecutors perform executions so that they can be done "right." Don't leave it to thugs. duh. Then we played Doom on Playstation.

In America, there are so many stories about "botched" executions that it makes my head hurt. If the bad guy died, then what is the problem? He suffered. And.....? It's so ironic that I could become a vegan and never need vitamin supplements.

Why not just let the governors or the prosecutors research killing someone "humanely" and do it themselves? Sometimes you just have to do the dirty work yourself if you can't employ anyone else to do it the way you want it done or just STFU and cancel executions altogether.



Breaking news: The guy who video taped the execution on his cell phone has been arrested.
Not only that, according to Americablog, there were 2 videos confiscated. Not only that, if the WH was so shocked and appalled that Saddam was being hung on a Muslim holy day, why did they hand him over so quickly?

Some interesting information on US executions can be found here.


Tuesday, January 2

Bush Breakdown Dead Ahead? By W. David Jenkins III

From Democratic Underground

via God...

I particularly enjoyed the last paragraph of the article!!!!


Unlike Hitler in his last days, who had no armies or recourse, Bush has more than a few options should he suffer any form of breakdown - should he become aware that he has no escape from those whom he has infuriated – and none of them are in anyone’s best interest, including his. But something makes me think that consequences mean little to Bush. Maybe it’s the last six years.

Rather than a statesman who is capable of accepting responsibility, Bush reminds me of the petulant child who finds he’s losing a game of Monopoly. I have an image of that child sweeping the board in a single stroke and stomping off home, huffing and puffing – leaving the rest of us to clean up the mess.

Privatizing the Police State

Did anyone else catch this story in today's Wapo? The Private Arm of the Law- Some Question the Granting of Police Power to Security Firms

excerpt: The trend is triggering debate over whether the privatization of public safety is wise. Some police and many security officials say communities benefit from the extra eyes and ears. Yet civil libertarians, academics, tenants rights organizations and even a trade group that represents the nation's large security firms say some private security officers are not adequately trained or regulated. Ten states in the South and West do not regulate them at all.

Some warn, too, that the constitutional safeguards that cover police questioning and searches do not apply in the private sector. In Boston, tenants groups have complained that "special police," hired by property managers to keep low-income apartment complexes orderly, were overstepping their bounds, arresting young men who lived there for trespassing.
So corporations are picking up the slack and providing "protection" and law enforcement where taxpayer money runs out.

Just a thought though- if corporations paid their fair share of taxes in the first place, couldn't the government afford to pay more police? Or maybe if we didn't have so many working poor people in this country, or if corporations paid living wages to all its employees, we wouldn't have so much desperation and crime. If all citizens got a decent education and had halfway decent opportunities to make something of their lives.... oh I don't know...

Don't forget bugmenot.com to get passwords and stuff.

Existential Angst

Is Free Will An Illusion?

That hunk of chocolate cake is in your mouth before you've even had time to think about your girth or your arteries. Your wife knows what you are going to order from the menu before you do. You perform some tasks better when you don't think about what you are doing.

Are your choices already determined? And if so, how do you maintain your outrage at Hitler?

I've just read Free Will: Now You Have It, Now You Don’t in the NY Times three times. It's a well researched essay and very thought provoking for you brilliant readers contemplating your very existence. Just how in control are you? Does the physical universe stop while you are making a decision?

UPDATE: I Fixed the link which was messed up previously. Sorry about that.

Use bugmenot.com to get access to nytimes.com but don't tell anyone I suggested it.

We Get Mail

So many stories, so little time


In this post 9/11 world in which we live in...
Is he a threat to the wishes of terrorists who want to blow up NY?

George Pataki, the former NY Governor, who stood silently behind Rudy Guiliani after 9/11, is granted 24 security upon becoming a civilian.

From Terrible
-----------

Chief Justice John Roberts says low pay for federal judges is a threat to the judiciary branch.
"Federal district court judges are paid $165,200 annually; appeals court judges make $175,100; associate justices of the Supreme Court earn $203,000; the chief justice gets $212,100."

And "we the people" are worried about this? Is justice not its own reward?

Roberts thinks that judges low pay constitutes a "constitutional crisis." Who approved this man for the job? The repeal of habeus corpus didn't bother him? Why did he accept the nomination in the first place if the pay so lousy? So what if college professors and deans make more than he does? They are not public servants.

Meanwhile, US Troops serving in Iraq are losing their lives and limbs serving our country. How much do they get compensated?

From Gaia Sighs
--------------

What kind of fun can you have with a Tombstone Generator?

From Father Tyme
-------------

Anntichrist S. Coulter had a vision. She wants to produce it.
-------------

Who could have imagined that there was money to be made from designing virtual outfits for your virtual animated self-image in a virtual community? And who could have imagined that this would become an issue that is being argued by courts in this post 9/11 world?

From Tali
-------------

World faces hottest year ever, as El Niño combines with global warming

YIKES!


The return of El Niño

Aside from the seasons, El Niño and its twin, La Niña, are the two largest single causes of variability in the world's climate from year to year.

Both are dictated by shifts in temperature of the water in the tropical Pacific basin between Australia and South America. Named from the Spanish words for "Christ child" and "the girl" because of their proximity to Christmas, they lead to dramatic shifts in the entire system of oceanic and atmospheric factors from air pressure to currents.


(we're off the hook this year girls!)

I wonder who will be the first fundie to warn that this weather pattern is a sign of the second coming -- beware!



It's going to be in the 60's by the end of the week here on the east coast. My hostas have started to poke through and it looks like I'm going to have to order some more tick killer for the pup as they always make it into the house when it hits 60. I hate ticks. I love the winter -- it kills the ticks and lots of germs. Everybody seems to have the stomach bug or head cold around here. We count on 'clearing out the air' when the kids vacate the schools for winter break. I guess that won't be happening til February vaca maybe? 60 degrees this weekend -- I'll be at the beach for sure!

I dread the inevitable increase in my homeowners insurance if the big northeast hurricane hits this summer (it was supposed to hit this past summer, wasn't it?) Maybe they won't even cover me this year as it looks like the insurance companies must have a expert weather forecaster working for them. They're pulling out of a lot of places.


On a more positive note (i think), Anti-Aging Molecule Discovered!

We may just get our chance to see how this whole mess plays out. I hope they can tweak that molecule to be heat resistant.

Monday, January 1

In case anyone is playing "Monopoly" today......

you may be interested in this little known fact I just discovered about the game. While doing a search on Burton Wolfe, (I quoted him in our discussion on atheism) this popped up --

Anti-Monopoly
A professor and a freelance writer are determined to set history straight on the origin and theft of a favorite American pastime
by Burton H. Wolfe, Free Press contributor



WHAT A STORY! I had no idea "that the original purpose of the Monopoly game was to teach the evils of exploitation, that it was conceived by socialists rather than its alleged inventor, and that the giant gamesmaker Parker Brothers has no right to monopolize it."


I've often wondered what kind of possible subliminal messages may have been ingrained into our generation of monopoly players. I can't help but wonder about the players who REALLY got into the game. I wonder if a lot of them are wealthy today? The game DID turn most of us into money hungry crazy people. (I always started out strong, but then quickly lost interest -- regardless of whether I was doing good or not. Just plain too long of a game on most days)

Now after reading about the initial intention of the game, I can't help but wonder if things would be, you know, maybe more fair?

Probably not. Those 'socialist' inventors of the anti-monopoly game would never have thought to sue the makers of the monopoly game that would have eventually been thought up. The Monopoly game would have quickly taken over the anti-monopoly game because it would be a lot more fun and exciting to play, and act out!