Debate aftermath
The John Kerry campaign would like you to please voice your opinions to the television news. They are spinning away dangerously. We can't let Kerry's victory be squashed. Here's a link to get all the contact information.
Hoping for some zingers in the Bush-Kerry face-off?
Not with these rules of engagement
By Gersh Kuntzman Newsweek
Looking forward to the presidential debate? Don’t bother. There isn’t going to be one.
Oh, sure, George W. Bush and John Kerry will stand on the same stage on Thursday, but any similarity between that and a debate is purely a function of the power suits they’ll be wearing and the stump speeches they’ll be spitting out in 90-second chunks.
...But in reality, the candidates don’t stand face to face, they are under no obligation to answer questions and they are forbidden, by the very rules of the debate, to respond to each other.
I can say that because I’ve just read the debate’s 31-page "memorandum of understanding" hashed out by the Kerry and Bush campaigns (if you want to see the full text, hunt around on georgewbush.com or johnkerry.com). Thanks to this lawyerly document, the rules of engagement prevent almost all engagement. It should be called a debase rather than a debate. Read whole thing at newsweek
Oh, come on.
I mean, really now. Like anyone worth their even remotely sober intellect didn't have, during that entire, cute little "Memogate" scandal, in their mind's eye a slightly oozing picture of BushCo's master puppeteer and most favoritist overfed pit bull Karl Rove, sitting there all puffed up and wheezing and hunched over his grease-stained nail-studded Compaq Presario after yet another three-Martini, four-baby-seal-kabob lunch, hammering out those forged memos about Bush's military ineptitude on his swiped copy of MS Word.
Can't you just see it? Hear the heavy breathing? Smell the gin? Could this picture be very far from the truth? Because, verily, if it ain't the truth, it's hovering over it like a giant elephant-shaped radiation cloud.
And who can't clearly see Rove, the ruthless conspirator and "co-president," grinning like a troll on ether, orchestrating the whole memo maneuver and hiring some GOP flunkies to feed the docs to overly gullible CBS News with the full intent of later discrediting them and screaming abut the bogus "liberal media" and hanging sad wonky ol' Dan Rather out to dry and making a big fat nonsensical media field day of it?
Read the rest
-----------------------
Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
1023 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202-408-7560
www.csgv.org
Wednesday, Sept. 29th the House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on HR 3193, legislation to repeal Washington DC's gun laws. This is the companion proposal to the recently abandoned effort in the Senate.
Voice your opposition to repealing DC's gun laws that have the widespread support of the local community. The vote on HR 3193 is being pushed by the Republican leadership, who don't represent DC residents and who care more about pleasing the gun lobby than public safety. Instead, Congress should vote to ban assault weapons, a proposal supported by more than 70% of Americans.
HOW YOU CAN HELP:
1) Contact your House member NOW and tell them to VOTE NO on HR 3193.
Email: http://action.csgv.org/action/index.asp?step=2&item=21846
2) Call: Use the Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121
Don't know who your House member is, use our legislative directory .
3) Please pass this action alert onto your family, friends, and co-workers.
A spokeswoman for Utah Senator Orrin Hatch describes the bill as a way to "restore the rights of law-abiding citizens" who want to protect themselves.
AAlso from WaPo: "Last night, GOP House leaders rejected proposed Democratic amendments to water down the bill by extending a national ban on 19 types of semiautomatic weapons, maintaining such an "assault weapons" ban in the District and banning armor-piercing ammunition in the city. "
"District leaders warned of an "arms race with criminals" if the bill becomes law.
"This makes a mockery and a joke of the whole homeland security issue as far as I am concerned," Ramsey said, noting that he had to pass through a checkpoint and metal detector to reach the Capitol and that a security-related visitor center under construction "looks like a bunker to me."
"You have all these protections for the Capitol, and you make city residents fend for themselves," Ramsey said. "They're hiding in bathtubs for protection from stray bullets."
Janey said he would have to tell his students, "This is a textbook case of what not to do in a democracy." "
As voters, we need to ask ourselves “why Gallup would use a methodology that would almost definitely mean that their election predictions would be wrong?” These writers are somewhat baffled in answering that question. Why would Gallup want to give the false impression of a Bush lead?
I ran into several people I hadn't seen in a while at the polls. We signed in to vote and were waiting on line. We mixed ourselves up in the line because we were all chatting with each other. No one voted in the order that we signed up for. It was noted by an observer who reported it to the lady at the desk who signed us in. The lady at the desk went ballistic on us telling us that we can't vote out of order. It's not allowed.
I indicated to her that it shouldn't matter at all. We signed up. We voted. She indicated that it does matter what order you vote in and that you HAVE TO vote in the order that is on the list. I explained that the only way it should matter is if they are monitoring who is voting for whom. She said that no one checks who we vote for because it's illegal. I said that it shouldn't matter then. The election ladies went crazy marking stuff all over the list trying to make a note that the 6 of us messed up the line. She tried to find out exactly what order we voted in afterall. We then pretended that we couldn't remember and kept changing our story. She threatened to make our votes null and void. We shrugged and left not even considering that she could do such a thing... but maybe they could?
Maybe this is a 3rd world country with nukes.
Falwell expressed confidence in a Bush victory over Democratic Sen. John Kerry, adding, "You cannot be a sincere, committed born-again believer who takes the Bible seriously and vote for a pro-choice, anti-family candidate."
The Rev. Frank Pavone of Priests for Life, who, in announcing a $1 million campaign to mobilize church-going voters, likened politicians who support abortion rights to people who support terrorism.
Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., who said "preachers must be free to speak out" in favor of anti-abortion office-seekers because liberals are attempting to "eliminate the Judeo-Christian principles upon which this country was founded."
Many Iraqis said they thought the numbers showed that the multinational forces disregarded their lives.They are having a hard time getting former soldiers to show up to fight in Iraq. War is not going so well for the bushcrimefamily.
"The Americans do not care about the Iraqis. They don't care if they get killed, because they don't care about the citizens," said Abu Mohammed, 50, who was a major general in Saddam Hussein's army in Baghdad. "The Americans keep criticizing Saddam for the mass graves. How many graves are the Americans making in Iraq?"
At his fruit stand in southern Baghdad, Raid Ibraham, 24, theorized: "The Americans keep attacking the cities not to keep the security situation stable, but so they can stay in Iraq and control the oil." 'Knight Ridder
Since Sept. 11, 2001, more than 18,000 military personnel have passed through the hospital [Landstuhl Regional Medical Center ] from what staff refer to as "down range": Iraq and Afghanistan. Of those, nearly 16,000 have come from Iraq.
Last month, 23 percent of those were casualties from combat, slightly higher than most months; the rest had either accidental or disease-related complaints.
Thirteen have died at the hospital.
Each day, an average of 30 to 35 patients arrive on flights from Iraq. The most on a single day was 168.
More than 200 personnel have come in with either lost eyes or eye injuries that could result in sight loss or blindness.
About 160 soldiers have had limbs amputated, most of them passing through the hospital on their way home to more surgery.
And it's not just their bodies that come in needing fixing. More than 1,400 physically fit personnel have been admitted with mental health problems.
Then there are the Pentagon's figures that touch on all casualties from the war in Iraq: 1,042 dead; 7,413 injured in action, including 4,026 whose injuries have prevented them from returning to duty. In Afghanistan, there have been 366 injuries and 138 deaths.
One other number tells a slightly different tale, a story of selflessness in the face of suffering: one third. That's about how much money surgeons at Landstuhl make compared to what they could make if they chose to work in the civilian world.
"There is nothing more rewarding than to take care of these guys," said Place, the skin around his eyes reddening with the tears that he failed to hold inside. "Not money, not anything."
...
Col. Earl Hecker sat outside the room where nurses were applying the white antimicrobial cream to one of the burned soldiers. Twenty-seven-years-old, Hecker remarked, looking at the patient's notes.
Hecker, at 70, is a few generations older than his patient. A surgeon who had retired from the Reserves but recently rejoined, he has forsaken his private practice in Detroit for now to help at Landstuhl, working past his assigned 90-day tour to stay nearly 150 days.
This experience "has changed my whole life," he said, his jovial demeanor fading to introspection. "I'm never going to be the same."
The day before, Hecker had been taking care of an 18-year-old soldier who, thanks to an Iraqi bullet, will forever be quadriplegic.
Hecker sat gazing through the window at the burned soldier and thought of the kid he had sent off to the States the day before. "Terrible, terrible, terrible," he said, staring into the distance. "When you talk to him he cries."
...
"I just want people to understand - war is bad, life is difficult," he said.
Maybe it was the stress, maybe it's because Hecker has no military career to mess up by speaking out of line, but it just came out: "George Bush is an idiot," he said, quickly saying he regretted the comment. But then he continued, criticizing Bush as a rich kid who hasn't seen enough of the world. "He's very rich, you'd think he'd get some education," Hecker said.
Bush still master of debating game (Times of India)This article is in the India Times. Is this for Indians living in the US or Indians living in India? And what is the point? Bush has a touch of alzheimers but he might win the debates anyway? Who says who wins? CNN and Fox? I don't even have to watch the debates to know who will be declared the winner though.
WASHINGTON: George W Bush doesn't like debating, but he is good at it, and that deceptive reluctance will be part of his arsenal when he goes toe-to-toe with John Kerry.
Republicans are still trying to paint the incumbent president as the outsider, as in the comment by Bush communications advisor Karen Hughes who recently remarked that the Democratic presidential contender, a veteran senator, has "spent his life preparing for these debates."
But Bush is actually a formidable debate opponent, as he demonstrated against Al Gore four years ago, thanks to his simplicity of expression and an instinct for when to attack. "Bush has been far more skillful in his debating career than is generally appreciated and his successes in that realm put his widely noted lack of eloquence in a different light," journalist James Fallows observed in a recent article in The Atlantic Monthly magazine.
The biggest danger for Bush is no doubt his own syntactical slip-ups and factual vagueness. Several times during a press conference with Iraqi prime minister Iyad Allawi on Thursday, he referred to the "Afghan army" when he meant "Iraqi". He confused terrorists Abu Nidal and Abu Abbas and even spoke of the "Soviet dinar" as the currency in Saddam's Iraq.
Al Qaeda is present along the border region of Pakistan and Afghanistan and is encouraging Afghan insurgents to disrupt presidential elections scheduled in just two weeks, on Oct. 9, the commander of American forces in Afghanistan, Lt. Gen. David Barno, said Saturday.WaPo contends that the US will not allow any al Qaidan disruptions at our elections:
"We see indications that Al Qaeda is encouraging a disruption of elections,'' General Barno said.
Counterterrorism officials concede they do not have new or specific intelligence outlining plans for an attack, but they say they remain alarmed by indications that al Qaeda and other terror groups might seek to influence U.S. elections as they did in Spain last spring by setting off bombs on commuter trains in Madrid. By publicizing the government's disruption efforts, which will begin in earnest later this week, authorities say they hope to forestall any plans for similar attacks here. And also from WaPo:
"The information that the federal government has tells us the prudent thing is to make sure we do everything we can to reduce anxiety, and to make sure the process of democracy goes on uninterrupted," said George W. Foresman, homeland security adviser to Virginia Gov. Mark R. Warner (D), chairman of the National Governors Association.
We have other problems besides international terrorists disrupting our elections. We have the BushCrimeFamily to deal with. We have international election inspectors checking out our upcoming elections. These are the people who observe fledgling democracies: Miami Herald:
The international team - among five visiting swing states Missouri, Arizona, Florida, Georgia and Ohio - next month expects to report its findings, offer suggestions and assess whether they'll monitor in smaller groups the November elections in the selected locales.Use bugmenot.com to get log ins for the above websites.
The four local visitors - from South Africa, Canada, the United Kingdom and the Philippines - were part of a 20-person contingent organized by Global Exchange, a San Francisco human-rights group.
Four years after Florida's recount exposed weaknesses in U.S. election systems, the international group from 15 countries and five continents hopes global pressure helps boost voter confidence and head off potential headaches.
Bill O'Reilly, who recently interviewed Stewart on his show in connection with the book, expressed a perhaps-envious awe: "You actually have an influence on this presidential election. That is scary" - though, O'Reilly said, Stewart's audience consists of "stoned slackers." Stewart, not mentioning the slipped-disc theory, denied any influence.
But young people, slackers or not, are big fans of the show (about half the viewers are 18 to 34, according to Nielsen, and the vast majority are younger than 50). And that should, indeed, translate into big book sales, says American Booksellers Association Vice President Suzanne Staubach, general books manager at the UConn Co-Op in Storrs, Conn.
What was terrifically ironic is that a journalist who was talking to Stewart on the Daily Show recently told Stewart that he didn't ask hard enough questions to Kerry. How did Stewart respond? He said, "I'm a comedian!" Brilliant.
Polling conducted between July 15 and Sept. 19 among 19,013 adults showed that on a six-item political knowledge test people who did not watch any late-night comedy programs in the past week answered 2.62 items correctly, while viewers of Late Night with David Letterman on CBS answered 2.91, viewers of The Tonight Show with Jay Leno answered 2.95, and viewers of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart answered 3.59 items correctly. That meant there was a difference of 16 percentage points between Daily Show viewers and people who did not watch any late-night programming.
The campaign knowledge test covered such topics as which candidate favors allowing workers to invest some of their Social Security contributions in the stock market, the income range at which John Kerry would eliminate the Bush tax cut, and which candidate is a former prosecutor. read more
Dear Mr. Bu$h, I am so confused. Where exactly do you stand on the issue of Iraq? You, your Dad, Rummy, Condi, Colin, and Wolfie -- you have all changed your minds so many times, I am out of breath just trying to keep up with you!
"There are individuals and officials who are actively trying to stop people from voting who they think will vote against their party and that nearly always means stopping black people from voting Democratic," said Mary Frances Berry, head of the U.S. Commission on Human Rights.
(...)
"In elections in Baltimore in 2002 and in Georgia last year, black voters were sent fliers saying anyone who hadn't paid utility bills or had outstanding parking tickets or were behind on their rent would be arrested at polling stations. It happens in every election cycle," she said.
(...)
Minority voters may be deterred from voting simply by election officials demanding to see drivers' licenses before handing them a ballot, according to Spencer Overton, who teaches law at George Washington University. The federal government does not require people to produce a photo identification unless they are first-time voters who registered by mail.
PETER JENNINGS: We were struck today by a very pointed attack by President Bush on John Kerry.
First of all, this is what Mr. Bush said.
[begin video clip]
BUSH: We agree that the world is better off with Saddam Hussein sitting in a prison cell.
And that stands in stark contrast to the statement that my opponent made yesterday, when he said that the world was better off with Saddam in power.
I strongly disagree.
[end video clip]
JENNINGS: And this is what Mr. Kerry actually said. [emphasis original]
[begin video clip]
KERRY: Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who deserves his own special place in Hell.
But that was not...in and of itself, a reason to go to war.
The satisfaction...that we take in his downfall does not hide this fact:
We have traded a dictator for a chaos that has left America less secure.
[end video clip]
You may never have noticed if you read most U.S. newspapers, or watch American television, but 113 countries -- not including the United States -- teamed up at the United Nations this week to demand a tax on arms sales to fight world hunger.and ends with this:
Rather than dismissing the proposal out of hand -- and, once again, coming across as the world's evil superpower -- the Bush administration should have embraced the tax on arms sales with a twist: that its proceeds only go to democratic countries that pursue responsible economic policies.UPDATE AGAIN: I was just looking at pictures from Haiti and reading about the thousand people or so who drowned in the floods from Tropical storm Jeanne. They are digging mass graves. Bodies are everywhere. 30,000 are homeless. Oh my god. Found an article Deadly flooding blamed on poverty
Barring a ban on arms sales -- which would be even better, but has little chance of getting support in Washington -- it's an idea whose time has come.
"After all, this is the BushCo era, baby. This country is all about excess and earthly abuse and Texas-sized faux machismo masquerading as true patriotism. Why even try to hide your gluttony anymore? Be proud of it, says the GOP -- er, the CXT."- Mark Morford
"Italian diplomats have claimed that, by disseminating bogus documents stating that Iraq was trying to buy low-grade "yellowcake" uranium from Niger, France was trying to "set up" Britain and America in the hope that when the mistake was revealed it would undermine the case for war, which it wanted to prevent." read the article.
Telegraph: "Microwave weapons that cause pain without lasting injury are to be issued to American troops in Iraq for the first time as concern mounts over the growing number of civilians killed in fighting.
The non-lethal weapons, which use high-powered electromagnetic beams, will be fitted to vehicles already in Iraq, which will allow the system to be introduced as early as next year.
..."It just feels like your skin is on fire," he said. "[But] when you get out of the path of the beam, or shut off the beam, everything goes back to normal. There's no residual pain.""
....a review of records shows that not only did he miss months of duty in 1972, but that he also may have been improperly awarded credit for service, making possible an early honorable discharge so he could turn his attention to a new interest: Harvard Business School.About that Blount campaign in Alabama:
"He just said George had called him and told him that Georgie was having some difficulties in Houston. Big George thought it would be beneficial to the family and George Jr. for him to come to Alabama to work on the campaign with Jimmy."That pesky physical:
... an aide to Mr. Bush explained that he had missed his physical because he was waiting to get examined by his personal physician. But pilots were required to be examined by military doctors.And that "honorable" discharge:
A retired Army colonel, Gerald A. Lechliter, who has prepared an extensive analysis of Mr. Bush's National Guard record, described Mr. Lloyd's memorandum as "seemingly an attempt to whitewash Bush's record." Mr. Lloyd declined comment last week. Mr. Lechliter, who describes himself as a political independent, also said that Mr. Bush was not entitled to 20 credits he received from Nov. 13, 1972, until July 19, 1973, because the service was being made up improperly.
Mr. Lechliter also said that Mr. Bush should not have been paid for these sessions. "That would appear to be a fraud," he said in an interview last week.
However the points added up, on Oct. 1, 1973, Mr. Bush was awarded an honorable discharge. By that time he was already at Harvard.
"After the speech, Assemblyman Bill Baroni, R-Hamilton, referred to Niederer allegedly striking a spectator. "She really ought to find something to do with her time," he said, adding that 1,200 audience members "had a great time."
The event planners were prepared for such an outburst.
Event volunteer Karolina Zabawa, 20, described her duties: "If anybody acts up, I just start chanting, `Four more years!'"
"George W. Bush has cultivated a culture in which a grieving mother in New Jersey gets arrested for asking a question at a Bush campaign event. It’s the same culture that allows an Alabama woman to be fired for expressing her beliefs with a John Kerry bumper sticker on her car. You ask a question they don’t want to answer and they arrest you. You express a belief that they disagree with and you get fired.
"This is not the way we treat anyone, and especially not the families of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice -– families who deserve our respect, our thanks, and our empathy. Unfortunately, this incident is emblematic of the way the President disrespects our military, our veterans, and their families. America can do better, and with John Kerry we will." -Terry McAuliffe
If Kerry wins now, the nation won't have suffered enough, won't have traveled far enough down the road of right-wing egotism and misogyny and homophobia and religious self-righteousness and deficit mauling and sanctimonious ideology and mangled grammar to really learn anything indelible, nothing that will affect a permanent sea change in our worldview, and we will just continue to limp along, never really healing and never really refocusing our intention and never fully understanding the depths of our dark side.He has a point. I have thought that if Kerry wins, it will just go back to Clinton bashing type times again and no one will have learned anything... No one learned shit after 12 years of nonsense from Reagan and Bush. Bush the first won the presidency even after the Iran Contra scandal and now even Ollie North is some sort of tv star on Fox. Morford claims it might take 16 more years of this torture for it to sink in to the American populace (if we don't shoot ourselves with our automatic weapons) and some of us are going to be rather old by the time the country comes around again. Maybe we should just grab that pendulum by the balls and yank it back to the center as hard as we can while we still have it in us.
And, furthermore, if Kerry wins, history might not be as fully and inevitably antagonistic toward BushCo as his short, dreadful despotism deserves. Our national memory is frightfully short. Everyone will think, oh well, it's all over now and the damage has been done and it wasn't all that bad, really, was it?
The US government's own figures show that it contained the highest levels of deadly dioxins ever recorded - about 1,500 times normal levels. Unprecedented levels of acids, sulphur, fine particles, heavy metals and other dangerous materials were also measured.
Asbestos was found at 27 times acceptable levels, and scientists found about 400 organic alkanes, phthalates and polyaromatic hydrocarbons - many suspected of causing cancer and other long-term diseases.
The site at Ground Zero went on smouldering, becoming what scientists describe as a "chemical factory", creating new dangerous substances. - The Independent
WASHINGTON - April 26 - In the May 3rd issue of Newsweek, an unofficial study by a defense consultant, now circulating through the army, shows that U.S. soldiers do not have military vehicles, equipment or armor needed for protection against Iraqi uprisings consequently that has meant 25% more American casualties in Iraq.
The study cites that of the 190 killed by landmines, improvised explosive devices, or rocket-propelled grenade attacks, "almost all those were killed while in unprotected vehicles, which means that perhaps one in four of those killed in combat in Iraq might be alive if they had had stronger armor around them." Additionally, "thousands more who were unprotected have suffered grievous wounds, such as the loss of limbs."
Bush, however, continues to withhold funding that military officials say is desperately needed to plug shortfalls in armor and protection equipment.
Instead of following through on his promise to give the military the urgently needed protection equipment, Bush has left major funding holes in the most basic areas.
Military commanders just last week desperately begged Congress just last week to fill key shortfalls left by the President's budget.
They pointed out a $132 million shortfall for bolt-on vehicle armor, an $879 million in shortfall for combat helmets, and a $40 million shortfall for body armor. Meanwhile, according to the Chicago Tribune, the White House has "dramatically reduced the number of Abrams tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles in Iraq," even as the fighting intensified, leaving troops to "ride in lightly protected Humvees, trucks and troop carriers" which are much more vulnerable to attack.