Evil Catholics Defy the Sanctity of the Church
Today's getting to know your blonde friend feature: I don't know why it's my job to point out religious hypocrisy when my life is so darn
"Strangely, prominent conservative/populist media people like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Tony Snow and Bill O'Reilly are not scheduled to speak anywhere."
The magazine quoted a visitor who had been shown the gun, which is kept in a small study off the Oval Office where Bush displays memorabilia. It is the same room where former President Clinton had some of his encounters with former intern Monica Lewinsky.
WORLD PEACE PRAYER
Lead us from death to life
Lead us from falsehood to truth
Lead us from despair to hope
Lead us from fear to trust
Lead us from hate to love
Lead us from war to peace
Let peace fill our hearts, our world, our Universe.
In the wake of WorldNetDaily's exclusive report this week, hundreds of American citizens have contacted a group of Christian activists looking to secede from the United States to form a republic based on Christian principles.
"It's unleashed a barrage," said Cory Burnell, president of Texas-based ChristianExodus.org . "It's been an incredible response, it's nothing I'm used to and is fairly gut-wrenching for me."
Burnell and like-minded believers are looking to encourage thousands of U.S. citizens to migrate to South Carolina, run for state office, and eventually prompt South Carolina to peacefully secede from the union to create a new country where "government derives its power from the consent of the governed."
He says since WND's story was first posted, the number of those actively interested has jumped from a few dozen people to hundreds. Many people are also stepping forward to work as volunteers, and Burnell himself has had numerous appearances on radio talk shows as well as "Hannity and Colmes" on the Fox News Channel.
Corporatism views human rights of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population is brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. The tactic is to use secrecy, denial and disinformation. -American Fascism
DiPierro, a cop in the 46th Precinct, worked at Ground Zero all night on Sept. 11 and every day for months afterward.
He was diagnosed with thyroid cancer in March, and underwent surgery on April 5 to have two tumors removed.
By September 2002, Shore became crippled with pains in his rib cage that spread to his spine. Months later, he was told those pains were caused by terminal pancreatic cancer.
By April 2003, Shore was having surgery at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center to remove his pancreas, gallbladder and spleen.
Shore is not expected to survive, despite extensive chemotherapy and radiation treatments. His doctor, Charles Hesdorffer, insists the deadly blend of noxious gases released by the collapse of the towers either caused or accelerated his condition. -NY Daily News
Richard Lahm, 49, who retired from the 46th Precinct in the Bronx this year, is battling terminal tonsil cancer - a condition his doctor claims was caused by the toxins released at Ground Zero.
...The FDNY received a $25 million federal grant to monitor health issues with firefighters. The NYPD was denied a similar grant.
...Detective John Walcott is one of those cops who has filed a notice of claim against the city seeking financial compensation after he was diagnosed with cancer last May.
...This year, Walcott has undergone bone marrow transplants and a series of chemotherapy treatments, and he often wakes up in the middle of the night with blood coming out of his eyes.
....NYPD street crime Detective Robert Williamson, 43, became sick with pancreatic cancer in March 2003, a year after he retired from the force. Williamson, his doctors and his attorney, Michael Barach, insist he became sick inhaling carcinogens at Ground Zero 16 hours a day for five months. He never smoked and has no family history of cancer.
...Uniformed Firefighters Association President Steven Cassidy said three Brooklyn firefighters have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer since working at Ground Zero. Another has leukemia. Hundreds more have retired with asthma and other respiratory issues, he said. -NY Daily News
Pete Strahl was on his belly, crawling in a tunnel of debris under 7 World Trade Center to reach an injured civilian...
Strahl is now battling a deadly throat cancer. His lung tests are also showing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dubbed the "World Trade Center cough" by medical experts.
"They took out my voice box," said Strahl, a 21-year FDNY veteran who retired in August 2002, just months after doctors found a malignant neoplasm of the larynx in his throat.
...Strahl's oncologist, Louis Rosner, said he believes the 47-year-old father of three developed cancer because of his work on Sept. 11 and in the days after.
The deadline to apply for financial help from the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund passed on Dec. 22, 2003.
Advocates and lawyers fear that some serious, even critical, health problems related to 9/11 will not become apparent until months or years later, too late to apply to the fund.
Attorney Michael Barasch, who represents Pete Strahl and a slew of other emergency workers, said he has 73 clients who missed the deadline.
..."Their injuries were not diagnosed until after the deadline. But cancer doesn't have a calendar. Their lungs weren't informed of the deadline to apply," Barasch said. "The fund was very fair to people who had orthopedic injuries but very unfair to people who had latent diseases who were not diagnosed prior to the deadline." -NY Daily News
...the [tidal] wave in The Day After Tomorrow is medium-sized—just high enough to wet the face of the Statue of Liberty, but leaving her head and upraised arm sticking out of the water. Although the image was, I’m pretty sure, a nod to Planet of the Apes ’ iconic final moment, I was reminded more of a beach-going mom who’s decided to smoke and swim at the same time, determinedly holding that cigarette above the waves.
...The point is not that New Yorkers are living in fear, but that we’re not. We are neither offended nor horrified by these particular images because we have disinvested in the idea of our own destruction, opting instead for the safety of statistics. Another way of saying that 2,801 people died in the World Trade Center is to say that seven million New Yorkers didn’t. This is one of those rationalizations that is either very brave or very foolish, but it is, to all appearances, and for all intents and purposes, the way things are now.
...For Mr. Emmerich, New York would seem to embody all that is evil in our post-Revolutionary, pre-Apocalyptic nation...[it] seems to be the somewhat resigned notion that, well, we deserve what’s coming to us. Some sort of civilization-ending event initiated not by terrorists but by nature or fate, which we might here term our collective unconscious, or perhaps simply our collective stupidity...
...Or maybe he’s just some kind of tough-love junkie. In The Day After Tomorrow , he’s hit upon a narrative of particular, if somewhat belated, resonance to New Yorkers. Quaid’s against-all-odds quest trades on the sense of helplessness that all Americans, but especially New Yorkers, felt in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, as we watched the towers burn for a few minutes that seemed to last millennia, and then searched for endless weeks afterward for survivors, or at least something recognizable to put in the ground. Quaid’s command to Gyllenhaal to "stay in the building" is eerily reminiscent of the advice given to occupants of the World Trade Center after the plane hit the north tower. That advice, we now know, was a mistake—and, to Rudy Giuliani’s credit, just about the only fucking mistake that was made—and Quaid is setting out, not quite three years too late, to rectify it. Come hell or high water (both of which do come, if we accept Dante’s vision of the final pit as a lake frozen by Satan’s breath), Quaid will get his son out. And, of course, he does—dads always get their sons out in movies like The Day After Tomorrow . And when he does, guess what: everybody at my screening laughed again.
..The buildings stand, but the city, and indeed the nation, falls. The fact of the matter is, Americans, for good or ill, have made their pact with the devil, and will have their second homes and S.U.V.’s and personal electronic devices and 4.4 pounds of trash per day; and New Yorkers, in denial or acceptance, have made their peace with life in this city in the wake of the attack on the World Trade Center. We are a city under threat, a threat that it doesn’t take a rocket scientist (or climatologist) to predict will come sooner or later, be it another bomb, or radioactive device, or chemical or biological agent. Our fear of that attack isn’t so great that we’re willing to make changes in our lifestyle—to move, or to live under a police state. Rather, we trust to the safety of the herd: It is the stragglers that will get picked off, the weak, the sick, the old, the unwary or unwise. Someone else will die; when the helicopters come to pull the survivors out, as they do at the end of The Day After Tomorrow , we believe that we will be among the pitifully small crowds gathered on the rooftops of this metropolis we’ve chosen to live in. Mr. Emmerich’s vision of the Apocalypse is just about as plausible as the one in the Book of Revelation, but that isn’t why we don’t believe it. We’re much too busy believing in stories we’ve made up all on our own.
"Some in this class are graduating with honors, and I congratulate all of you on an achievement that took a lot of discipline. Others may have spent a little less time in the library -- (laughter) -- a little more time keeping the stools warm down at The Chimes. (Laughter and applause.) But you earned your degree, and you, too, can leave today with high hopes. I speak with some authority here -- (laughter) -- I've seen how things can work out pretty well for a C student."
"There's no such thing as a self-made man or woman. Everyone has had a little help along the way."
Dear President Rabinowitz,
I am writing to commend you for your selection of EL Doctorow for commencement speaker at Hofstra. I just read about it in Newsday. My son attends Hofstra's Honors College class of 2007. At first I was saddened that Mr Doctorow was booed and wondered if Hofstra was the right place for my son but then again, I suppose everyone is entitled to their opinions.
I was glad to see that many in attendence at the commencement ceremony gave Mr Doctorow a standing ovation. whew! Unfortunately, at this time in history, Mr Doctorow's sentiments are not merely political opinion, they are fact. We are facing in American history what can only be called a dangerous revisiting of Germany before the war. I never in my life envisioned an America like we have today. I never thought we would be so dangerously close to a fascist dictatorship in this country. People say that we don't have the holocaust so it's isn't like Nazi Germany. I say, Just Wait.
The Department of Justice website, just a click away, indicates plans to return to conscription. The Bush administration, famous for denying truths, will surely be drafting our young people if this administration is elected to power in November. I am surprised that more students are not aware of how close they are to conscription. There will be no college deferments this time. A student may only finish his/her current semester. I suppose if more students were aware of this, the sentiments would be more like they were when I was in college during the Vietnam conscription years.
Again, I applaud you for the courage in bringing a speaker who dared to speak the truth in these times. The truth these days is a hard thing to swallow but I think it's high time that Americans grow up and take responsibility for their country and regain control for their future and the future of their children.
Sincerely
BlondeSense
Dear Newsday,
My son is a student at Hoftstra and I am happy to read that Hofstra had the guts to bring in a speaker like EL Doctorow who dared to speak the TRUTH about this administration.
At this time in history, the politics of the Bush administration are carving out a dangerous future for all our children. They will be faced with more wars in the event that this administration is elected in November. They will find it more difficult to find jobs as corporatism takes more of a stranglehold on our society and they face the possibility of taking jobs that require them to wear a hair net to work. They will be paying off the deficit for the rest of their lives. All our futures are uncertain as this administration makes Americans look ugly to the rest of the world. Our borders are wide open and terrorists are still free to come and go as they wish.
Those who booed Mr Doctorow were in denial of the harsh realities facing the graduates of Hofstra. This is no time to paint a rosy picture of the future for our youth. There is no rosy future. Mr Doctorow did not give an opinion, he gave facts. Facts that the students should have been aware of.
I implore Newsday to please interview Ms. Sibel Edmonds in Florida, former FBI interpreter to get the facts about the 9/11 coverup. The people of this country need to be more aware of what happened to us on that day and why. The future of our democracy depends on it. Newsday has a responsibility to its readers and to democracy.
Sincerely
BlondeSense
Dear Prime Minister
I am writing to ask you to urgently amend your government's policy of house demolition and destruction of land and property in Israel and the Occupied Territories.
Such destruction has resulted in widespread violations of the right to adequate housing and a decent standard of living for tens of thousands of people and violates fundamental principles of international human rights and humanitarian law.
I am concerned that in Israel, homes of Palestinian citizens of Israel seem to be targeted through a policy of large-scale confiscation of land, restrictive planning regulations, and discriminatory policies in the allocation of state land. In the Occupied Territories, the destruction of Palestinian homes and land appears to be linked to a policy of appropriating as much as possible of the occupied land, notably by establishing Israeli settlements and related infrastructure, and military/security needs are often invoked as a pretext for the destruction of homes and properties, including as a form of collective punishment. House demolitions should never be anything but a last resort.
I call on you to cancel all outstanding orders for demolitions in Israel until such time as Israeli law is amended in a manner that complies with international standards. I also urge you to immediately order a halt to all house demolitions and destruction of property for punitive reasons or where there is no absolute military necessity, and cancel all demolition orders of unlicensed houses in the Occupied Territories.
Yours sincerely,
"Throughout our history, wartime has been a time of sacrifice. ... What have we sacrificed?" McCain said. "As mind-boggling as expanding Medicare has been, nothing tops my confusion for cutting taxes during wartime. I don't remember ever in the history of warfare when we cut taxes."
Hastert joked, "Who? Where's he from? A Republican?"
Then Hastert said, "If you want to see sacrifice, John McCain ought to visit our young men and women at Walter Reed and Bethesda (two Washington area military hospitals). There's the sacrifice in this country. We're trying to make sure that they have the ability to fight this war, that they have the wherewithal to be able to do it..."
Hastert went on, "And at the same time, we have to react to keep this country strong not only militarily but economically. We want to be able to have the flexibility to do it. That's my reply to John McCain."
"The speaker is correct in that nothing we are called upon to do comes close to matching the heroism of our troops," McCain said. "All we're called upon to do is not spend our nation into bankruptcy while our soldiers risk their lives. I fondly remember a time when real Republicans stood for fiscal responsibility."
"...the number one issue facing Americans is whether Massachusetts, on May 17, unleashed the fatal blow to America's moral fabric. Armageddon is not what is happening on the ground in the Middle East; it's the havoc gay marriage will bring to America's cultural and political landscape.BushCo has an uncanny way of inciting hatred in his constituency and getting the sheep to follow. You know how the wingers are always accusing Kerry of politicizing? Yeah right. Remember how your mom always told you that if your jealous husband accuses you of cheating, it's because he is afraid that you are doing what he is doing? This is the same thing.
...
According to the Wall Street Journal, in several battleground states -- including Arkansas, Louisiana, Ohio, Oregon, Missouri, and Michigan -- "a vote on gay marriage may be included on November ballots, a move that could prompt a large turnout among socially conservative voters."
...
Will social conservatives be able to turn their collective rage against same-sex marriage into a bona fide campaign issue?
...
If that "silent majority" is awakened, the results could seriously affect John Kerry's campaign for the presidency."
The Justice Department has taken the unusual step of retroactively classifying information it gave to Congress nearly two years ago regarding a former F.B.I. translator who charged that the bureau had missed critical terrorist warnings, officials said Wednesday.Yes it reveals that the government knew that we were going to be attacked and it explains why Bush sat in the classroom on 9/11, why NORAD stood down, why Cheney sat in his office watching CNN on the morning of 9/11 and why Rummy sat in his office in the Pentagon doing nothing that day. This was Bush's Reichstag Fire boys and girls. Call your elected officials and demand answers.
Law enforcement officials say the secrecy surrounding the translator, Sibel Edmonds, is essential to protecting information that could reveal intelligence-gathering operations. But some members of Congress and Congressional aides said they were troubled by the move, which comes as critics have accused the Bush administration of excessive secrecy.
...
"I have never heard of a retroactive classification two years back,'' said an aide who spoke on condition of anonymity because the subject is classified.
"It would be silly if it didn't have such serious implications,'' the aide said. "People are puzzled and, frankly, worried, because the effect here is to quash Congressional oversight. We don't even know what we can't talk about.''
Senator Grassley said, "This is about as close to a gag order as you can get."
The F.B.I. denied the accusation.
"We're not imposing a gag order,'' the F.B.I. official said. Members of Congress have the information, but have to treat it as classified, the official said. "The problem is that while these pieces of information may look innocuous on their own, you put them all together and it reveals a picture of sensitive intelligence collection, and that's a security problem.''
"American soldiers and armed U.S. civilians could be seen milling about Chalabi's compound in the city's fashionable Mansour district. Some people could be seen loading boxes into vehicles. Aides said documents and computers were seized without warrants. "Well how do you like that? We've been paying Chalabit $350,000/month and he turns out to be a crook. How many of you are not surprised?
"A senior coalition official said several people were arrested and that arrest warrants were issued for "up to 15 people" on allegations of "fraud, kidnapping and associated matters." "
"Newsweek magazine has reported that Chalabi and some of his aides are suspected of giving information about U.S. security operations in Baghdad to Iran."
""I am America's best friend in Iraq," Chalabi said. "If the CPA finds it necessary to direct an armed attack against my home, you can see the state of relations between the CPA and the Iraqi people." " -CBS NewsI hope we cut off his salary.
Elsewhere, some of the family members lingered and spoke of how they had not heard the questions and answers they had come to hear. Some had lost faith in the commission, saying it seemed to be committed to a sanitized history of that day.
"We fought like crazy to get this commission established," said Lorie Van Auken, whose husband, Kenneth, died in the north tower. "We want the truth. If we're not being told the truth, if we are only being told one side of the story, the commission is not doing its job properly."
Betsy Parks, who lost her brother, Robert Emmett Parks Jr., on Sept. 11, had yelled out in the room for a family member and a first responder to be on the panel. Now she said, "I wanted to hear why everybody above the fire in both buildings was simply forgotten about." She said, "I was disappointed by Giuliani's testimony. I was bored by it."
One young woman shook her head and smiled: "He's a legend. No one takes on a legend."
Rain continued to fall from the sky. Rudolph Giuliani was long gone.
By institutionalizing the "war on terrorism" a government may acquire a rationale for expanding its powers and furthering its domestic agenda. While the nation's resources are directed toward endless war, promoting tax cuts in the midst of recession, leaving few resources available for domestic programs.Read the whole thing here
This form of fascism will sneak up on you in a disguise. Slowly it's roots will grow deeply, spreading in all directions, entangling the entire society.The ideologically driven party nurturing its own intellectuals and supporting a network that transforms the national ideology from mildly liberal to predominantly conservative, slowly pushes the Democrats to the right enfeebling opposition. The government responds primarily to corporate interests; voters become cynical, resigned and opposition decreases. It adopts a reckless unilateralism, demands unquestionable support on terms it dictates; ignores treaties and violates international law at will; invades other countries without provocation; and incarcerates persons indefinitely without charging them with a crime or allowing access to counsel.
Most of us invest much time and energy trying to hide from the horror. We live in gated communities behind locked doors, with armed police units only three digits away. We hoard our resources, keep to our routines, and avoid strangers. We want to be safe. Our society enables this facade that safety is an external commodity. Yet, regardless of our efforts, in the middle of the night we awaken trembling; the fragility of our fate made manifest within the darkness that surrounds us. We cannot keep the horror out, because it dwells within;
"...I no longer had a healthy mind that could contemplate the world in a cheerful light. I had found that any such vision was indeed infirm and weak, because I had experienced the horror that lay just beneath our ordinary waking consciousness. Nothing could change that. Even if I never had another panic attack, I would never be able to forget what I have seen... "
- The Spiral Staircase, Karen Armstrong.
Even though the horror is nothing new, our means of global communication is greatly enhanced today. More of humanity is being forced to confront the horror than ever before. To some, it is the death of an age of innocence.
We are witnessing a time of grieving over the loss of more carefree days. Fear, denial, anger, and depression are to be anticipated responses.
"My local News Paper reported that the Iraqi people want those guards executed for the abuse in the Iraqi Prisons. Well Folks, if that be the case, than we must execute every towel-headed detainee for the crimes that they have committed. Their crimes are far more serious than taking photos of naked prisoners."
1 Thessalonians 4:13-18: For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.Sounds like an alien invasion. I don't mean to be smart. But really now. Anyway, it's pretty clear now that Bush is pursuing this armageddon, end times agenda with Christian Zionists to keep their $upport and get votes on election day.
Mark 13:26-27: And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.
Revelation 11:11-12: And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.
The Apostolic Congress dates its origins to 1981, when, according to its website, "Brother Stan Wachtstetter was able to open the door to Apostolic Christians into the White House." ...Ronald Reagan bore theological affinities with such Christians because of his belief that the world would end in a fiery Armageddon....Oh my. These nuts get to meet with the president and I can't go and talk some sense into him. Oh yeah, I don't make enough money to not pay taxes, so he isn't going to listen to me.
While the language of apocalyptic Christianity is absent from George W. Bush's speeches, he has proven eager to work with apocalyptics—a point of pride for Upton [he's the pastor for the Apostolic Congress]. "We're in constant contact with the White House," he boasts. "I'm briefed at least once a week via telephone briefings. . . . I was there about two weeks ago . . . At that time we met with the president."
Last spring, after President Bush announced his Road Map plan for peace in the Middle East, the Apostolic Congress co-sponsored an effort with the Jewish group Americans for a Safe Israel that placed billboards in 23 cities with a quotation from Genesis ("Unto thy offspring will I give this land") and the message, "Pray that President Bush Honors God's Covenant with Israel. Call the White House with this message." It then provided the White House phone number and the Apostolic Congress's Web address.Then what happened was the White House got 50,000 postcards opposing the Road Map, which aims to create a Palestinian state. Then Bush started backpedaling. Now if the rest of us knew about this stuff, we'd be sending millions of postcards to the White House. Maybe we better get cracking.
"The verb is like a weed in a field of flowers," he said. "You have to get rid of it to allow the flowers to grow and flourish.First, there was the novel written without using the letter "e". Now a French author has produced what he claims is the first book with no verbs. Read More
"Thousands of Afghan prisoners were killed while travelling in sealed containers on their way from Konduz to a prison at Sheberghan. The bodies of the dead and some who survived were then buried in a mass grave at nearby Dasht Leile. US special forces were closely involved and in charge at the time. Were they involved in a war crime? The Pentagon denies the events. The eyewitnesses tell what happened." Read more
Senator Zell Miller: "The two times I think I have been most humiliated in my life was standing in a big room, naked as a jaybird with about fifty others and they were checking us out, now that was humiliating. It was humiliating showering with sixty others in a public shower. It didn't kill us did it? No one ever died from humiliation."Zell, the moron that he is, left out the part where he was sodomized with a light stick and broomstick, forced to keep a bag over his head, forced to perform sex with other men, forced to (imitate?) oral sex, kicked, leashed like a dog, photographed and beaten almost to death. That was the most humiliating part and Zell couldn't even bring himself to recall that.
Imus: "Whenever I was naked I always felt sorry for the other guys."
...In a last effort to publicize their cause before the impending wave of same-sex marriages, conservative Christian groups are organizing an emergency telecast to churches around the country...Hey I am not a conservative Christian, but I would like to know what the emergency is and how gay marriages would affect me and my family personally. Do tell!
...The Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition, said: "I don't see any traction. The calls aren't coming in and I am not sure why."
... "Other issues are far more important to most Americans, including evangelicals — issues like the economy, jobs, health care, the war in Iraq," said Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
...The amendment's backers contend that the reason people are not responding more vocally is that many grass-roots conservatives do not yet understand how same-sex marriages affect them personally.
"Under fascism the big business virtually owns the government. How is that possible? By forming a capitalist oligarchy - an alliance of big business that takes over a political party; financing, buying, coercing elections; controlling the media, the economic assets of the society, it's representation in government and privatizing all agencies of the government. For the capitalists within the alliance, privatization of government agencies is a great source of revenue without competition or bidding process. It's like "wolves guarding the sheep"... " Read the whole article.
The final sentence of his memoirs completed, Bill Clinton is back, ripping into President George Bush's handling of the crisis in Iraq, and signalling that he intends to play a role in the race for the White House.
Liberated from literature, the old master is limbering up a new for political action. On Tuesday evening, he ripped into his successor for neglecting the real menace of Osama bin Laden to go after Saddam Hussein, and for gratuitously turning world opinion against America.
THE BUSH administration seems to have a serious problem with reality. The most recent reality challenge is the policy of torture in both Iraq and Afghanistan, which the administration is frantically redefining as "abuse," "excesses," and "humiliation." We even have Secretary Rumsfeld describing footage of several American soldiers "having sex" with a female Iraqi prisoner. Let's have a little plain English here. "Having sex" with a prisoner is known as "rape." Systematic beatings are called "torture." Excesses that lead to death are called "murder." The hundreds of women and children in mass graves in Fallujah are the product of a "massacre." Taken together, all of these add up to "atrocities."
The dissemination of "incomplete information" from "imperfect intelligence" is called "lies." The billions of dollars that Halliburton and Bechtel have reaped in profits are called "war profiteering." The invasion of Iraq is called "illegal." The destruction of America's international standing is called "permanent." And Texaco/Phillips's high bid for Iraqi oil is called "why we are in Iraq."
ERICA VERRILLO Williamsburg
May 12, 2004
Some people - some Americans - have forgotten about 9/11.So there you have it. Even the lead editor in the NY Post thinks Iraq had something to do with 9/11. An American civilian who was over there trying to make some money got beheaded by nutcases. It's a horrible thing and I was sickened by it, so now the NY Post proclaims we must pursue total "annihilation of those who practice butchery and barbarism" and "not stop until every last one of the savage thugs is dead." "If that means a resumption of major combat in Iraq, so be it."
That attack should have been enough to justify all-out war. But the hand-wringing over the war in Iraq - and over even the modest steps America took to defend itself, like the Patriot Act - suggests that folks truly have lost sight of what the war is about.
Yesterday they got a shocking reminder. And now they know: This war cannot be waged with half-measures.
It can end only with the total annihilation of those who practice butchery and barbarism. Those who have set as their goal the destruction of America.
There is no negotiating with such people. There can be no compromise with those who mean to destroy us.
Yesterday, the White House promised to "pursue those responsible and bring them to justice." That's the least of it.
America has to come out swinging.
And not stop until every last one of the savage thugs is dead.
If that means a resumption of major combat in Iraq, so be it.
...
To hell with political sensitivities in the region.
To hell with negotiating with radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr in Najaf and the Sunni insurgents in Fallujah.
To hell with handing Saddam Hussein over to Iraqis, as some want to do, and risking some reverse - perverse - kangaroo trial that results in his survival.
Evil, cutthroat terrorists need to be eradicated.
Let's face it: This is a job that's going to take overwhelming - yes, brutal - force. There is simply no "nice" or painless way to accomplish this.
As yesterday's slaughter showed (yet again), the enemy is bound by no moral compunctions.
America won't go that far.
But it had better steel it's backbone and get ready to fight like it means it.
It's the only way to win this war.
Is Criticism of the War Patriotic?I hear the one about supporting our president in a time of war the most often around here. It doesn't fly with me. I need facts and figures.
Nearly half of Americans (49%) say that criticism of how the war is being handled is neither patriotic or unpatriotic, while the other half divides evenly on the question (22% say it is unpatriotic, 23% say it is patriotic). Not surprisingly, views about criticism are highly partisan and strongly related to views about the war itself, with 43% of conservative Republicans saying critics of the war are unpatriotic, while just 6% of liberal Democrats agree. Interestingly, more male veterans than non-veterans weigh in on either side of the patriotism debate, though there is no agreement on the issue: 27% of male veterans say such criticism is unpatriotic, while 31% view it as patriotic.
Those who say criticism of the handling of the war is either patriotic or unpatriotic were asked why they feel this way. Several themes run through comments by people who see criticism as unpatriotic. Many mention the need to support the troops, or the idea that criticism undermines their efforts. A typical comment was that criticism is wrong "because it's a smack in the face to those boys over there." Mentions of George W. Bush and the need to support the president in time of war were also very common. "I just think you should stand by what your president does. He wouldn't send our boys to war to fight for our freedom for no reason," said one respondent.
Those who said criticism is patriotic tended to stress the principle of freedom of speech. "Patriotism is your ability to disagree," said one respondent. Another said that criticism is patriotic "because this country is founded on the idea that you can express opinions which are unpopular." Many people said we need to hear the criticism in order to avoid costly mistakes. One person remarked that "knowing the truth will prevent another Vietnam."
According to statistics compiled from World Health Organization data and a Harvard University study:While we are hell bent as a nation to stop abortions, we can't provide healthcare to all people and even if a woman takes a child to term, we still have the highest infant mortality rate of any developed nation. And God forbid you live to be old, you will get zapped unless of course you are among the wealthy or have good children who can take care of you.
The US ranks NUMBER ONE in COST of health care, but NUMBER 24 in disability-adjusted life expectancy, and NUMBER 37 in the overall performance of its medical system and NUMBER 40 in the level of satisfaction recipients express for their care.
Nearly half of all people in the US with below-average incomes report that it is "extremely, very, or somewhat difficult" to get medical care when they need it.
INFANT MORTALITY RATE per 100,000 births
Sweden: 382 Japan: 396 Norway: 413 France: 476 Austria: 492 Denmark: 551 Canada: 552 UK: 586 Israel: 662 US 772
ELDERLY CARE (From 2000 Harvard School of Public Health report)
More than 1 in 4 (29%) elderly Americans have a difficult time meeting their basic monthly expenses. Additionally, 32% of US elderly have no drug coverage, 20% of US elderly pay $50-$100 per month out-of -pocket for drugs, while 16% pay more than $100 per month. By contrast, under 5% of the elderly in four other developed countries pay more than $100 per month. Finally, 15% of elderly people have foregone filling prescriptions because they could not afford it, while 18% have problems paying medical bills.
The US also has the greatest disparity between the health of the poor and that of the wealthy of all industrialized nations. Black infants, for example, have a mortality rate that is more than twice that of white children (14 versus 6 per 100,000).
The US also has the highest rates in the world of the following cancers: colon cancer in males, cancer of lung, breast, oropharynx, larnynx and bladder in women; and for both sexes: pancreas, thyroid, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, multiple myeloma, myeloid leukemia. America's five-year cancer survival rates for all types of cancer for all races: 4% (whites 5%; blacks: 2%).More people over 30 are dying of cancer than ever before. Cancer research is a big waste of money. Drug companies are big business and corrupt and in cahoots with big government.
And now here's a crowning fact in the cancer department. Billions upon billions of dollars are donated each year to cancer research from private, local, state, and federal sources. But cancer research fundraising has become just another Enron-style cash cow and PR op for the elite. .... only 16% of the billions poured into cancer research goes to cancer research. The rest goes to high-profile, big-buck figurehead positions and schmoozing.
So what is the answer to this systematic abuse of Americans? For the Democrats it is to aggressively promote a universal healthcare system which guarantees that every American has an equal shot at healthcare. The misinformation about universal health care that is being spread by the insurance industry and their henchmen in the GOP is appalling. For example, promoting the lie that universal healthcare would bankrupt the government. Study after study has shown that the cost of administering a centralized single-payer program would be less per citizen than the current ridiculous HMO system. In addition, the reduced number of lost days due to sickness and disability would be greatly reduced, as would the cost to the taxpayer of taking care of people who have gone without healthcare so long that they are, ultimately, thrown onto welfare or SSI unnecessarily.Considering that most of us are not secure in our jobs anymore and benefits vary from company to company, why aren't more Americans alarmed about this? Most of us are just one paycheck away from no healthcare or we have no healthcare. Yet somehow we elect those who do everything in their power to hamper universal healthcare and buy the myth that it would bankrupt the country or cause us to wait on long lines which is simply not true. That is part of the propaganda. Once more, our government only has big business in mind and not you!
Healthcare MUST be independent of job. Corporate indifference to employee well-being is notorious. Workers are routinely finding their providers changed, 'edited' (as in covering less for more $) or the cost jacked up. Then, when the company decides to throw its workers overboard so the overpaid CEOs can hoard the lifeboats, right in the midst of the stress of becoming jobless, workers are suddenly without access to healthcare.
- the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;These are the traditional elements enumerated in what is called the "just war" doctrine. The evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.
- all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;
- here must be serious prospects of success;
- the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated.
- The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.
U.S. corporate profits surged 87 percent from the third quarter of 2001 to the end of 2003, according to Commerce Department figures. Wages and salaries grew 4.5 percent. ....After inflation, real wage gains were 1.1 percent...So productivity is up and corporations don't need as many employees, profits are up, yet employees pay is virtually the same as it was 2 years ago.
...Executive pay hasn't been as restrained as that of workers. Salaries of chief executive officers rose 8.7 percent on average in 2003 at 70 companies studied by Bloomberg, while U.S. employees' average pay inched up 1.5 percent. In 1980 CEO pay was 40 times that of the average worker, now it is as much as 400 times to 550 times higher.
...Motorola Inc., Eastman Kodak Co. and Caterpillar Inc. all announced first-quarter profits last month that at least doubled from a year earlier... Like other U.S. corporations, all three have trimmed their payrolls since 2001.
...Wage gains have been curbed by a loss of 1.5 million jobs since January 2001 and productivity gains of more than 4 percent in each of the past two years, the first time that's happened since records were kept in 1947.
``They basically froze our pay scale,'' Green said. United Auto Workers Union members last month rejected Caterpillar's latest contract proposal to cut wages for new workers.Well there you go. Bush is only interested in corporate gains for their wealthy stockholders. Profits have not trickled down to the actual workers who made the corporation grow. The profits are staying in the corporations. How does that do anything for the economy? It doesn't.
...
The lack of real gain in wages may hurt President George W. Bush's re-election chances. ``There's a tension between what's good for the stock market and what's good for Bush in the election,'' said Tom Gallagher, a Washington political analyst for International Strategy and Investment Group Inc...
The contrast between stagnant wages and soaring profits "is a good part of the explanation for Bush's negative polling numbers on the economy,'' Gallagher said.
Some companies have begun to cut benefits. Motorola and Deere & Co. have stopped offering health-care coverage for future pensioners. Others, such as DuPont Co. and General Motors Corp., are charging them more.Bye bye middle class.
Some companies including Delphi Corp., the world's largest maker of auto parts, and Visteon Corp., the fourth-largest, plan to cut new workers' wages. Georgia-Pacific Corp., the biggest U.S. plywood maker, reported April 29 a first-quarter profit of $147 million....[union workers are] about to vote on a contract that calls for 2 percent-a-year pay increases in two of the next four years, with cash payments instead of wage boosts in the other two.
Dow Chemical Co., the largest U.S. chemical company, reported April 29 that its profit increased sixfold in the first quarter, to $469 million... wages increased by 4 percent in 2003 after pay boosts of 3 percent in each of the two previous years, some of it absorbed by higher medical insurance costs.
President Bush is resolved not to repeat what he thinks were the two fundamental blunders of his father's one-term presidency: abandoning Iraq and failing to vanquish the Democrats.I've said it here that this man has severe oedipus issues. This is also the man who said, "They want the federal government controlling Social Security like it's some kind of federal program."
...Mr. Bush said his father had "cut and run early" from Iraq in 1991.
... "Freedom will prevail, so long as the United States and allies don't give the people of Iraq mixed signals, so long as we don't cower in the face of suiciders, or do what many Iraqis still suspect might happen, and that is cut and run early, like what happened in '91," Mr. Bush said.
... Mr. Bush also said Mr. Kerry thinks "that the federal government will solve the medical issues facing small businesses and large businesses and the unemployed."
"I don't," he said. "I think that the federal government needs to pass policies that will enable private-sector solutions to emerge, such as medical-liability reform, associated health care plans, expansion of health-savings accounts."
...Mr. Bush acknowledges that he encourages such misjudgments by detractors.
"People tend to discount my ability to get things done, and that's exactly what I want," the president said in an interview. "I want people to underestimate.
"But this president came from West Texas," Mr. Card said of the younger Bush, contrasting the two resumes. "And West Texas was his home for a lot longer than it was for the former president.And I should be impressed why? What exactly does West Texas have to do with the rest of the world? I'm having a heart attack here, you know.
"He was the governor of Texas. He wasn't the first envoy to China or the U.N. ambassador or the CIA director. His training was dealing with problems on the streets of Laredo or Dallas or Houston or Midland or Austin. This president came with a kind of street smarts and recognition of the importance of the resolve of America."The 'resolve of America' is reflected in the streets of Laredo? Somebody pour me a drink.
"...And, you know, for one thing, I'm a little disappointed in Rumsfeld--he allows the greatest fighting force on the face of the globe to have girl generals--what are we doing with girl generals?""
"...our military was trained how to bury the dead so that their heads were facing Mecca. That's an incredibly honorable thing to do--and, by the way, it's something that doesn't occur to a woman because we are vicious. You don't want us in the military."
"...It's in our genes to protect the hearth and home. to respond viciously to the enemies, to intruders, whereas, just think of immediately after the 9/11 attack, I was huffing and puffing and fuming the very night of it that we weren't already dropping bombs in Afghanistan?-- "
"People are so angry. There’s no way to explain the reactions- even pro-occupation Iraqis find themselves silenced by this latest horror. I can’t explain how people feel- or even how I personally feel. Somehow, pictures of dead Iraqis are easier to bear than this grotesque show of American military technique. People would rather be dead than sexually abused and degraded by the animals running Abu Ghraib prison.And don't forget my fellow Americans that Bush gave a campaign speech just this past Monday saying that the torture and rape rooms were gone. Remember that at the voting booth this November.
"There was a time when people here felt sorry for the troops. No matter what one's attitude was towards the occupation, there were moments of pity towards the troops, regardless of their nationality. We would see them suffering the Iraqi sun, obviously wishing they were somewhere else and somehow, that vulnerability made them seem less monstrous and more human. That time has passed. People look at troops now and see the pictures of Abu Ghraib… and we burn with shame and anger and frustration at not being able to do something. Now that the world knows that the torture has been going on since the very beginning, do people finally understand what happened in Falloojeh?"
"...All I can think about is the universal outrage when the former government showed pictures of American POWs on television, looking frightened and unsure about their fate. I remember the outcries from American citizens, claiming that Iraqis were animals for showing 'America's finest' fully clothed and unharmed. So what does this make Americans now?
"...Today's lesson: don't rape, don't torture, don't kill and get out while you can- while it still looks like you have a choice... Chaos? Civil war? Bloodshed? We’ll take our chances- just take your Puppets, your tanks, your smart weapons, your dumb politicians, your lies, your empty promises, your rapists, your sadistic torturers and go."
We are at War With The Terrorists, said NaifMmmm. Sounds like fighting words to me. That should take Bush's mind off the Iraqi prison scandal.. oh wait, he doesn't read and will have to wait until this story is on 60 Minutes. WW3 anybody? Which side are we going to be on? Feeling a draft kiddies?
-JEDDAH, 8 May 2004 — Saudi Arabia is in a state of war with terrorism, Interior Minister Prince Naif declared yesterday. But he also said efforts at communicating with extremists had been effective in bringing a number of them back into the fold....................
...................Speaking to top military and civilian officials in Jeddah last Saturday when four terrorists went on a shooting spree in Yanbu killing five Westerners and a National Guard officer, the crown prince said he believed Zionists were behind most terrorist attacks in the Kingdom. But in a press statement after the attack, Prince Naif blamed Al-Qaeda.
“I don’t see any contradiction in the two statements, because Al-Qaeda is backed by Israel and Zionism,” he said.
"One thing is for certain: There won't be any more mass graves and torture rooms and rape rooms."
G W Bush, Monterrey, Mexico, 2/12/04

Home: Trailer park, West Virginia; Age: 21; Hopes: See the world and make money; Likes: hunting, smoking, drinking, gang bangs, homo-erotic role playing; Favorite Song: Theme from Deliverance; Pet Peeves: boys who don't do what they're told. Read more about me...
"The disclosures by the White House officials, under authorization from Bush, were an extraordinary display of finger-pointing in an administration led by a man who puts a high premium on order and loyalty. The officials said the president had expressed his displeasure to Rumsfeld during a meeting in the Oval Office because of Rumsfeld's failure to tell Bush about photographs of the abuse, which have enraged the Arab world.
The disclosure of the dressing-down of the combative Rumsfeld was the first time Bush has made public his anger with a senior member of his administration. It also exposed the fault lines in Bush's inner circle that have only deepened with the violence and political chaos in American-occupied Iraq.
Secretary of State Colin Powell, who is antagonistic to Rumsfeld, went so far Tuesday night as to talk about the prison-abuse scandal in the context of the My Lai massacre in the Vietnam War, a historical reference that was not in the White House talking points that sought to stem the damage from the scandal.
Powell, in an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live," brought up My Lai without prompting from King, saying he served in Vietnam "after My Lai happened" and that "in war, these sorts of horrible things happen every now and again, but they're still to be deplored." -LA Daily News
""The president met with Secretary Rumsfeld yesterday and they had a good discussion. I will leave it at that," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. "The president very much appreciates the job Secretary Rumsfeld is doing and the president has great confidence in his leadership."So we found out that Bush had -no idea about the atrocities going on in Iraqi prisons until it was aired on 60 Minutes II. He should be out of his freaking mind with rage at his chain of command if this is true. And it must be true. Why? Because he was happily trotting across the country for months raising money for his election campaign and explaining how we are winning the 'war on terror'. If he really knew about these atrocities, he would have done something to get this covered up or dealt with it over a year ago while the Army was investigating it.
"In the last 16 months, the Army has conducted more than 30 criminal investigations into misconduct by American captors in Iraq and Afghanistan, including 10 cases of suspicious death, 10 cases of abuse, and two deaths already determined to have been criminal homicides, the Army's vice chief of staff said Tuesday." -NY TImesOn the other hand, Bush must have known, someone must have told him, that war is hell and some soldiers and "Paid Contractors" might do stuff that is really bad and against the Geneva Convention because Bush made sure that the US couldn't be dragged before the International Criminal Court for war crimes back in 2002. It probably wasn't his idea to come up with that idea, but it should have raised some flags in his mind. (I am assuming that he actually has a couple of brain cells left to rub together)
"... the intentional abuse of detainees by military police personnel included the following acts:Well why wouldn't the President know about it? Apparently Rummy didn't even read and he admitted it in a press conference at the Pentagon. Can you imagine having a press conference and then not being familiar with the very report that the journalists had already read? Read the Pentagon News Briefing and be as embarrassed as I am.
Punching, slapping and kicking detainees; jumping on their naked feet.
Videotaping and photographing naked male and female detainees.
Forcibly arranging detainees in various sexually explicit positions for photographing.
Forcing groups of male detainees to masturbate themselves while being photographed and videotaped.
Arranging naked male detainees in a pile and then jumping on them.
Positioning a naked detainee on a box [of meals ready to eat], with a sandbag on his head, and attaching wires to his fingers, toes and penis to simulate electric torture.
Writing "I am a Rapest" (sic) on the leg of a detainee alleged to have forcibly raped a 15-year-old fellow detainee, and then photographing him naked.
Placing a dog chain or strap around a naked detainee's neck and having a female soldier pose for a picture.
A male MP [military police] guard having sex with a female detainee.
Using military working dogs (without muzzles) to intimidate and frighten detainees, and in at least one case biting and severely injuring a detainee.
Taking photographs of dead Iraqi detainees.
"There certainly are allegations of abuse in various other locations," Rumsfeld said. He called the images of hooded, naked Iraqi prisoners being made to stand or kneel in humiliating poses before smiling American guards "troubling ... disturbing ... (and) clearly unhelpful." [unhelpful? this man has such a -stupid way with words .- BlondeSense]Do you believe the arrogance of this man? He really doesn't even a shit and doesn't care if we know about it.
But Rumsfeld rejected criticism of how he handled the matter as per usual. He said the slow pace of reporting the allegations up the chain of command was "perfectly proper." Asked why he did not demand to see photographs of the alleged abuses that his top general was trying to keep off of a CBS broadcast, Rumsfeld said, "I think I inquired about the pictures and was told we didn't have copies." -Arizona Central
"The same day that Rumsfeld added his contribution to the history of Orwellian statements by high officials, the Senate armed services committee was briefed behind closed doors for the first time not only about Abu Ghraib, but about military and CIA prisons in Afghanistan. It learned of the deaths of 25 prisoners and two murders in Iraq; that private contractors were at the centre of these lethal incidents; and that no one had been charged. The senators were given no details about the private contractors. They might as well have been fitted with hoods.Are you getting nauseaus? I am. Didn't the Republican leaders take an oath to defend the constitution? They are defending their party, right or wrong. Now that is just plain despicable. The Guardian goes on to say:
Many of them, Democratic and Republican, were infuriated that there was no accountability and no punishment and demanded a special investigation, but the Republican leadership quashed it. The senators want Rumsfeld to testify in a public hearing, but he is resisting and the Republican leaders are blocking it. -The Guardian"
Bush has created what is in effect a gulag. It stretches from prisons in Afghanistan to Iraq, from Guantánamo to secret CIA prisons around the world. There are perhaps 10,000 people being held in Iraq, 1,000 in Afghanistan and almost 700 in Guantánamo, but no one knows the exact numbers. The law as it applies to them is whatever the executive deems necessary. There has been nothing like this system since the fall of the Soviet Union. The US military embraced the Geneva conventions after the second world war, because applying them to prisoners of war protects American soldiers. But the Bush administration, in an internal fight, trumped its argument by designating those at Guantánamo "enemy combatants". Rumsfeld extended this system - "a legal black hole", according to Human Rights Watch - to Afghanistan and then Iraq, openly rejecting the conventions.I heard from an insider last evening that private contractors are being paid $125,000/yr. The US is sending letters to former Marines to come back to Iraq. Big bucks. Killing spree with no laws, baby. The Democrats today are calling for Rumsfeld to be fired. Like that will ever happen.
Private contractors, according to the Toguba report, gave orders to US soldiers to torture prisoners. Their presence in Iraq is a result of the Bush military strategy of invading with a relatively light force. The gap has been filled by private contractors, who are not subject to Iraqi law or the US military code of justice. Now, there are an estimated 20,000 of them on the ground in Iraq, a larger force than the British army."
"But should I? Is it helpful? Is it essential to human dignity? Does it promote harmony and understanding? Or does it divide us so fundamentally that it threatens our ability to function as a pluralistic community?... When should I argue to make my religious value your morality"Cuomo argues that we must press on to make abortions a rare occurrence through proper health, education and welfare. From his speech:
"Are we asking government to make criminal what we believe to be sinful because we ourselves can’t stop committing the sin?Rock on Mario Cuomo. In April of this year, Mr Cuomo was interviewed by Religion and Ethics regarding the controversy over Kerry's pro-abortion stance by certain Bishops. Cuomo makes it clear that not many bishops are saying anything about the political role of Catholics. It's a very few. My opinion is that the loud mouths are getting all the press but there is a lot more to being a Catholic politician than the abortion issue. We are still a pluralistic society. Cuomo explains, and I believe I made the point many times, that if one were to try to legislate all Catholic dogma, we'd have to live in a Catholic Theocracy. I always thought we'd have to be like the Amish if we stuck to pure Catholic dogma in daily life. Cuomo, like myself, doesn't believe that Kerry will be denied communion except by that St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke. In all honesty, around here, you can go to one Catholic parish where they are very strict and dogma abiding, then pop over to the next town and find a very loving forgiving pastor who welcomes everyone to share in the Mass as Jesus would surely do.
"The failure here is not Caesar’s. This failure is our failure, the failure of the entire people of God.
..."That [Christian Responsibility] it doesn’t end with abortion. Because it involves life and death, abortion will always be a central concern of Catholics. But so will nuclear weapons. And hunger and homelessness and joblessness, all the forces diminishing human life and threatening to destroy it.
..."We should understand that whether abortion is outlawed or not, our work has barely begun: the work of creating a society where the right to life doesn’t end at the moment of birth, where an infant isn’t helped into a world that doesn’t care if it’s fed properly, housed decently, educated adequately, where the blind or retarded child isn’t condemned to exist rather than empowered to live."
They [Catholic Church] did not oppose slavery in 1865 and in the late nineteenth century, although the pope had spoken against it. They do not bring the same ardor to insisting on their position against the death penalty today. Nobody knows that better than I. I was badly mauled by people in New York State for being against the death penalty for 12 years. In all that period, the Church never spoke against it. Now they have spoken and said it's wrong except in very few emergent situations...Cuomo is asked if he feels the Church's stance against Kerry will hurt his chances in states with large Catholic populations?
"If it is a political issue, I suspect that it will not hurt John Kerry, but it may hurt the Church. And that troubles me....Mr Cuomo talks about what made him give his speech in 1984. He said then Cardinal O'Connor of NY said that Catholic politicians were on the verge of losing their [Catholic] rights to this or that if they didn't toe the line.
"One of the reasons the country was created was for me to be free to be a Catholic and you to be whatever you wish to be. In order to protect that freedom of religion, you must be careful not to intrude upon other people's freedom of religion. For me to be protected in my right to be against abortion and against contraceptives, I have to make sure not to tread upon your right not to believe in those things, because if I can impose my religion on you, you can impose your religion on me. And so the best way to preserve the freedom of religion in this country is for government to stay away from making rules that are basically religious in nature."
..."They [Catholics] will make a judgment as to whether they think it's correct for the Church to punish John Kerry for not taking the position they wish him to take on abortion, while at the same time they're not saying the same thing about the death penalty, they're not saying the same thing about the war in Iraq, which the bishops said was not a just war."
"It went through me like a blade. That's when I sat down and did something that no Catholic had done before. I said, "We have to discuss this, discuss the theology of it. And we have to do it in a place where there are Catholics who know. And we have to let people witness it and make a determination: is this theology, as I see it, correct or isn't it?" I said that in 1984. It was discussed by theologians. It was written [about] by theologians. If you look at the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CATHOLICISM that's put out by Notre Dame, it's referred to. It's referred to as a proper statement. So it's a very big, very important subject. "When I attended a Catholic seminary for my MA in Theology, we studied Cuomo's speech. I had to write a paper opposed to it or defending it with sound theology. I supported the speech and explained how a ban on abortion in this secular society would be unfeasible at this time. First you would have to change societal values. Catholic women have just as many abortions as any other women in this country. How can a politician argue for a principle that the rest of the Church doesn't live up to?
"Try to convince her, "Look, you don't need an abortion here if you think you're not ready for this child, if you think you're not in a position to do the child justice. Let's work toward an adoption." Let's make it easier to have an adoption. "And we'll pay for your going to term. We'll give you a good doctor. We'll deliver the child and we will arrange the adoption." I think if we worked aggressively at all those things, we could reduce significantly the number of abortions, without ever offending anybody, without ever denying a woman choice, and without ever breaking any religious rules."This is exactly where the Republican right wing Christians fail. They offer no alternatives. You can't force a woman to have a baby and then not help her. If you are against abortion based on Christian theology, you can't ignore the living from the womb to the grave.

"How is that they have you on the run?" asked Repps Hudson, a Vietnam veteran, according to an account by a pool reporter.Seriously Mr, Kerry. Most people don't read the papers. The TV News is brainwashed by your opposition. You'll never get your point across if you don't fight back!
Mr. Kerry appeared irritated and insisted the Republican attacks were not so effective. "Americans aren't listening to all that junk," he said.
But Mr. Black seemed unpersuaded.
"He [Bush] doesn't know where he serves or what time period it was," he said of Mr. Bush's Air National Guard stint. "It should be made an issue. Because if he can send someone else's son to go fight or die, where were you doing your service?"-NY Times
"We are not that kind of people. Never have been. Americans, who preach the equality of all races, creeds, and cultures, are, de facto, poor imperialists. When we attempt an imperial role as in the Philippines or Iraq, we invariably fall into squabbling over whether a republic should be imposing its ideology on another nation. A crusade for democracy is a contradiction in terms.The story is worth a read. Thank goddess all conservatives don't have their heads in the sand.
"While it would be nice if Brazil, Bangladesh, and Burundi all embraced democracy, why should we fight them if they don’t, and why should our soldiers die to restore democracy should they lose it? Why is that our problem, if they are not threatening us?"