A BlondeSense Commentary:
Why do they call it the "Defense of Marriage Act"? Supposedly the "Defense of Marriage Act" is to reaffirm traditional marriage: one man and one woman. It says so in the Bible so it must be true. The Marriage Nazi's say that allowing gay people to marry is very dangerous to "THE CHILDREN".
The president said:
"And the preservation of marriage rises to this level of national importance. The union of a man and woman is the most enduring human institution, honoring -- honored and encouraged in all cultures and by every religious faith. Ages of experience have taught humanity that the commitment of a husband and wife to love and to serve one another promotes the welfare of children and the stability of society. Marriage cannot be severed from its cultural, religious and natural roots without weakening the good influence of society. "-President Calls for Constitutional Amendment Protecting Marriage
Traditional marriage is also detrimental to "THE CHILDREN". It also reflects the INSTABILITY of society because you have so many people running around getting married, divorced and remarried. If you look at some statistics that I dug up earlier, it looks to me like the people who are pushing for this "Defense of Marriage Act" are likely to have been divorced, are looking to get divorced or really unhappy in their marriages and wish they were divorced.
Why do they want to deprive gay people of such bliss? she asked snarkily
I have posted the whole article complete with statistics on this page. It shows that the very same people who are pushing for this constitutional amendment statistically fall into the same category as those who are serial monogamists. These are people who get divorced and remarried the most. These folks just happen to be conservative Christians. According to their Lord and Savior, divorced and remarried people are committing adultery. Adultery as a sin falls into the same category as homosexuality in the Bible. Blondesense connects the dots.